Overview/ research Flashcards

1
Q

What are the themes in developmental psychology?

A

1.Nature and nurture

2.Individual differences

3.The active child- development isn’t just something that happens to the child- researchers try to pull apart reasons

4.(Dis)continuity of development and critical periods (Piaget and Vygotsky)

5.Socio-cultural context- what is around the child and how that affects development (bronth and breener)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the 3 ways to measure development?

A

1) Cross-sectional design
2) Longitudinal design
3) Microgenetic design

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is a cross-sectional design and list pros/ cons

A

Compare children of different ages at a single time.

By doing this you could see whether they have developed a Theory of Mind. What you typically see is that at around age 4 most of them are now beginning to understand that they have developed it.

PROS:
- Faster to collect data (and cheaper!)
- Can identify differences between age groups

CONS:
- Uninformative about continuity/ discontinuity of development over age (e.g. stability of wellbeing)- we just know that across 2 age groups say there are differences. (doesn’t tell us about how or why)

  • Uninformative about individual differences (within a cohort)- it averages children out at different ages and helps reveal similarities and differences between older and younger children, but doesn’t tell you how wellbeing changes for an individual child over time or at different rates.

Explains the what but not how

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is a longitudinal design and list pros/ cons

A
  • Compare children to themselves.
  • Children are examined repeatedly over a prolonged period (over months or years).
  • Following the same children over a substantial period of time and measuring changes and continuities in these children’s development at regular intervals (big cohort studies do this).

PROS:
- Watch development unfold!
- Can examine the stability of individual differences over time and individual patterns of change

CONS:
- Practice effects
- Attrition (drop out) rates and bias (population bias)
- Takes a long time and a lot of resources- is it worth doing?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Longitudinal design:
1) what can you assess (design and theme)
2) when are they primarily used?

A

1) You can assess within-person changes with age and between-person differences in age changes; can also allow you to explore the theme of the ‘active child’ – bidirectional effects (e.g. temperament and parenting)

2) Due to cost and time they are used primarily when the research questions are related to stability and change in individual children over time. When the main focus is age-related changes in typical performance, cross-sectional studies are usually chosen.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is a microgenetic design and list pros/ cons

A
  • Children are observed intensively over a relatively short period.
  • A change occurs within this short period.
  • It’s like a focused and intense longitudinal design

PROS:
- Very detailed
- Intensive observation can clarify process of change as it occurs

CONS:
- Must know when change will occur
- No long term data about change patterns
- Narrow in focus

Usually applied to learn more about changes of cognitive functioning (e.g. theory of mind or arithmetic). Gives some precise information on the process of change but narrow in focus.
Basically there are no best methods. They all have issues. Has the researcher picked the best method to investigate whatever they are trying to investigate?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Genetically Informative Designs:
- what do they allow us to estimate?
- list some examples

A

Allow us to estimate (and in some cases locate) genetic contributions to development (eg. heritability)

  • Twin studies e.g. identical vs non-identical twin comparisons
  • Adoption
  • Adopted twins
  • DNA sequencing
  • Molecular-genetic
  • Genomewide scan
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are genetically informative designs useful for?

A

Useful for answering questions about Nature and Nurture.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

List 3 common data contexts

A
  1. Interview/ questionnaire
  2. Naturalistic observation
  3. Structured observation/ tasks
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Outline pros and cons of interviews/ questionnaires

A

Pros:
- Inexpensive way to gather self-reports.
- Clinical interviews allow for flexibility to respond to unexpected answers.

Cons:
- Often extract biased or ingenuine responses.
- They are also poor at predicting future behaviour.
- Relies on the child understanding the question etc.; often reliant on parent completion; shared method variance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Outline pros and cons of naturalistic observations

A

Pros:
Useful for describing behaviour and exploring social interaction.

Cons:
Lack control; naturally occurring contexts vary on many dimension. It can be hard to know which element of the situation is influential. Limited ability to explore infrequent behaviours.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Outline pros and cons of structured observation/ tasks

A

Pros:
- Allows controlled comparisons.
- Overcome some of the limitations of natural observations. Researchers design a situation to elicit a certain behaviour and repeat this for all participants. Allows direct comparison and for less common behaviours to be elicited

Cons:
- lack external validity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are some participatory techniques?

A
  • timelines and social network maps
  • NSPCC research with children in care
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are some practical problems (Fargas-Malet et al, 2010)?

A
  • Gaining access and seeking consent
  • Context/location
  • Data collection
  • Confidentiality and child protection issues
  • Debriefing and rewards

(harder to apply when critiquing studies in essays- How can we be sure that we are gathering representative information on all cohorts for example. Problematic children often not included in studies (e.g. victims of bullying not at school)).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Reliability:
- what is it?
- types?

A

The degree to which independent measurements of a behaviour are consistent

Inter-rater reliability: the amount of agreement in the observations of different raters who witnesses the same behaviour

Test-retest reliability: the degree of similarity of a pp’s performance on two or more occasions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Validity definition

A

The degree to which a test or experiment is measuring what it is intended to measure

17
Q

Construct validity:
What is a big question

A

Whether what we’re measuring actually exists in children – or are we taking an adult construct that we just assumed that children have – and there’s lots of things we don’t have direct access to e.g. empathy; wellbeing.

Examples:
We need to make sure that children express themselves in a way that is coherent to them. For example, to measure materialism, we can ask children to identify what is important to them (material possessions or family) from a series of pictures. But even then, are they really demonstrating materialism, or are we inferring an adult concept onto children who do not have the capacity to be materialistic?

How about something that we know is meaningful to children – bullying. How can we measure bullying? Bullying needs to be distinguished from aggression and can take many forms. Can those that understand the definition – teacher and parent reports - make valid judgements about those that can’t? How do we distinguish paranoids or deniers from valid cases when using self-report?

18
Q

Material things

A

From: Chaplin & John (2007) ‘Growing up in a material world: Age differences in materialism in children and adolescents’.

Relatively little research on links between materialism and well-being in children.

Examined link between materialism and self-esteem in three age groups (8-9, 12-13, and 16-18-years).

This picture shows the items on the Material Things board. Other boards were ‘Hobbies’, ‘People’ and ‘Achievements’.

Children are asked to consider whether these things make them happy. They also consider whether family members and friends make them happy and post their answers on a board (next slide).

19
Q

How was materialism measured?

A

Materialism was measured by asking ppts to construct a collage to answer the question ‘What makes me happy?’ Choosing more material goods such as ‘money’ and ‘popular brand names’ over non-materialistic sentiments such as ‘being with friends’ or ‘no homework’ indicated higher levels of materialism.