Language Acquisition 2 Flashcards
Learning words is ______?
Difficult
There are arguably infinite possible meanings for new words (Quine, 1960)
How Do You Know They Know What a Word Means?
context, repetition, feedback, associating words (patterns), non-verbal cues
Fast Mapping (Carey, 1978)
What is it?
Ability to quickly link (map) a novel name to a novel object, typically by applying known information.
Fast Mapping (Carey, 1978)
Task and results
Task:
Kids in daycare setting
“Bring me the chromium tray, not the blue one, the chromium one.”
Result:
13 out of 14 children brought the olive green tray
Task:
One week later… “which one is the chromium one?”
Result:
9 out of 13 children chose green or olive green (the original study does not specify which)
This suggests, after short exposure, kids can link a word to what it means
Word learning as a Dynamic system:
What is word learning a product of (nested timescales)?
- what the child is seeing/doing now
- what the child just did
- and the child’s developmental history
Examples of Word Learning: Now
What are children being asked to do on the test?
It’s easier to point to something than to
say a new word (Gordon & McGregor, 2014)
It’s harder to choose a known object in an unfamiliar colour (Perry & Saffran, 2017)
It’s easier to choose the correct object if nothing
else was named (Axelsson & Horst, 2013)
Examples of Word Learning: Recent Past
What were children just exposed to?
It’s harder to learn words from books with more illustrations (Flack & Horst, 2018)
(when you’re seeing less at once- it helps you narrow you’re focus)
It’s easier to remember object names if you were
exposed to several examples from the
category (Twomey, Ranson & Horst, 2014)
It’s harder to do well if the experimenter changes
(Goldenberg & Sandhofer (2013)
Example of Past Impacting Word Learning
List two options impacting whether children learn better + method
Encountering the same words across different stories
or
Encountering the words in the same story repeatedly?
- Read 3.5yr children storybooks 3x in 1 week
- Tested immediate recall for novel words
- Tested retention for novel words
Horst, Parsons & Bryan (2011)
Method
- We created 9 children’s books
- Each book depicted 2 novel objects(unusual), named 4x in each book
- story order counterbalanced across children
- half of the kids were shown 3 different stories on each day
- same stories condition- heard 1 story on the first day, a different on the second and a different on the third
- All children tested on immediate recall
- And on retention for words from Days 1 & 2
- Give kids 4 pictures and ask them to point to the object
Horst, Parsons & Bryan (2011)
Recall and retention results
Children who heard the same stories learned words significantly better than children in the different stories condition
Children who heard the same stories also retained words significantly better
dotted line- what kids behaviour would be like if it was random/ they were behaving by chance
Why does repetition help? + example
Know what to expect: focus on finer details on repeated readings
Eg.
Meet mum, meet Sophie, meet the tiger, they sit together, they have cake for tea details like yellow table or new words
Examples of word learning: Dev. history
Trauma, neglect, socio-economic differences, environment you grow up in
Example of Past Impacting Word Learning
- Do children learn words better from Naptime stories?
- Read 3.5yr children storybooks 3x in 1 week
- Tested immediate recall for novel words
- Tested retention for novel words
Williams & Horst (2014)
Method
1- read kids either the same stories 3x or different stories 3x
2- tested them immediately
3- in each condition, some kids had a nap and some kids had no nap
4- about 2 and a half hours later, they had a retention test
5- 24 hours later they had another retention test
6- 7 days later they had another retention test
Williams & Horst (2014)
Recall and retention results
Both story repetition and sleep facilitated word learning
At the beginning, all kids from the same stories condition were performing better. The kids which napped in this condition did better.
The kids who had the different stories and didn’t nap never caught up to the other kids.
Therefore, we can see Matthew effect- depending on where you’re starting, you’re path will diverge