Overall Test-Tort - Negligence-occupiers' Liability Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Which OLA act says that the owner of a property owes a duty to keep safe lawful visitors?

A

Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Which OLA act says that the owner of a property may also owe a duty to unlawful visitors (trespassers)?

A

Occupiers’ Liability Act 1984

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define lawful visitors

A

A visitor may have express or implied consent to enter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the four categories of lawful visitors?

A
  1. Repeated visit
  2. The doctrine of allurement
  3. Entry in order to communicate
  4. Statutory powers of entry
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How is a visitor lawful if he has made repeated visits?

A

If the occupier knows people regularly visit and he does nothing to stop it, consent is implied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What case, under the repeated visits factors demonstrates consent being implied?

A

Lowery v Walker (1911)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Under what circumstance will there not be liability for repeated visits?

A

If the implied consent is exceeded

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What case is used to demonstrate implied consent being exceeded?

A

Harvey v Plymouth County Council (2010)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the doctrine of allurement?

A

A child will not be considered a trespasser if he wanders onto land to investigate something dangerous and attractive to children.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What case is used to demonstrate the doctrine of allurement?

A

Jolly v Sutton London Borough Council (2000)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is meant by the factor “entry in order to communicate”?

A

There is implied consent to walk up to someone’s front door.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What case is used to demonstrate entry in order to communicate?

A

Robson v Hallet (1967)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Give some examples of statutory powers of entry.

A

An electricity meter reader
A postman
A fireman
A police officer with a warrant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Define the term trespassers

A

Someone who enters without permission and whose presence is either:
Unknown to the occupier, or
Known to the occupier who has objected to it in a practical fashion (e.g. a sign, verbal warning etc)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What kind of offence is trespassing?

A

Strict Liability-both a burglar and someone who is lost on private land are trespassers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

In what three circumstances can a lawful visitor become an unlawful visitor/trespasser?

A

Limits as to area
Limits as to time
Limits as to purpose

17
Q

Give an example of Limits as to area circumstance

A

A student can’t go in a staff room
A visitor to a museum should not enter a door marked private

18
Q

What is an exception for the limits as to area circumstances and what case demonstrates this?

A

Benefit of the doubt goes to the C
Pearson v Coleman Bros (1948)

19
Q

Give an example of a limit as to time circumstance

A

It would be trespassing to stay in a museum after closing time

20
Q

Give an example for a limits as to purpose circumstance and what case demonstrates this?

A

If you are there for one purpose but pursue another you may become a trespasser.
Tomlinson v Congleton Borough Council (2003)
Allowed in Council Park but not lake with signs forbidding swimming

21
Q

Facts of Lowery V Walker (1911)

A

Villagers habitually used D’s field as a shortcut to train station.
He put dangerous horse in it which attacks someone.
Liable as implied consent.

22
Q

Facts of Harvey v Plymouth County Council (2010).

A

To avoid paying for a taxi C ran across some open council land in the dark, fell and was injured. Land regularly used by teenagers and others; however, there was no implied consent to carry out dangerous activities like running in the dark.

23
Q

Fact of Jolley v Sutton London Borough Council (2000).

A

The attraction was an abandoned boat

24
Q

Facts of Pearson v Coleman Bros (1948).

A

a young girl wandered into the lion enclosure at a zoo and there were no clear signs to indicate where she was

25
Q

Facts of Tomlinson v Congleton Borough Council (2003).

A

C entered council park but became a trespasser when he jumped into lake despite sign forbidding swimming.