Other Defenses to a Contract Flashcards
What are the three elements of the duress defense to contract?
- A threat
- That is wrongful in nature, AND
- No reasonable choice but to succumb to the threat
Under which three circumstances would a threat be wrongful in nature?
- What is threatened is a crime or tort.
- What is threatened is a criminal prosecution or bad faith civil process.
- What is threatened is a bad faith breach of K (aka economic duress).
o NOTE: Economic duress is the most common circumstance tested.
o EXAMPLE: Sailors on a fishing voyage cease their work midway through the voyage and refuse to resume their duties unless the captain agrees to give them a raise.
When would it be unreasonable to succumb to a threatened crime, tort, or bad faith prosecution?
- Succumbing to a threat is seldom an issue when what is threatened is a crime or a tort, a criminal prosecution, or a bad faith civil suit, for risking the eventuality of any of those is scarcely a “reasonable” choice.
What are three common situations in which it would be reasonable to succumb to economic duress?
- Situation #1: No adequate and reasonably priced substitutes for the services/goods that are threatened to be withheld.
o EXAMPLE: The ship’s captain is not in a position to find replacement sailors when already at sea, so no adequate substitutes would be available. - Situation #2: The threatened breach would cause aggrieved party to break his own K’s (i.e. a threatened breach of a subcontractor that may force the general contractor to breach his own Ks).
o EXAMPLE: A purchaser of upsidasium bearings used in the manufacture of turbo-jet engines would, on account of the breach, be forced to breach its contract with an aircraft manufacturer. - Situation #3: When the alternative of acquiescing to the threat and then suing for damages is inadequate to address the harm caused.
o EXAMPLE: Where the threatened breach would cause the aggrieved party to renege on its own commitments and thus harm its reputation and opportunities for future business, damages would be inadequate as a remedy.
What are the two elements of undue influence as a defense to contract?
- Element #1: Unfair persuasion used
- Element #2: Other party was vulnerable to such persuasion
What is the test for determining whether unfair persuasion was used?
- Multi-factor test:
o Discussion of the transaction at an unusual or inappropriate time;
o Consummation of the transaction at an unusual place;
o Insistent demands that the transaction or business be finished immediately;
o Extreme emphasis on the untoward consequences of delaying the transaction;
o The use of multiple persuaders against the target of persuasion;
o Absence of third-party advisors to the target of persuasion;
o Statements that there is no time to consult financial advisors or attorneys.
When would a party be considered vulnerable to undue influence?
- Circumstance #1: Mental infirmity is due to age or illness.
- Circumstance #2: Vulnerability is due to recent trauma or event.
- Circumstance #3: There is a relationship of trust or confidence.
What two elements are needed to prove unconscionability?
- Element #1: Procedural unconscionability
- Element #2: Substantive Unconscionability
When has procedural unconscionability taken place?
- Bargaining process created an absence of meaningful choice for aggrieved party.
When has substantive unconscionability taken place?
- K terms are unreasonably favorable to one party to the K (ex: excessive price, extreme consequences for breach, or grossly unfair provisions).
o EXAMPLE: Where a pay-over-time plan requires the consumer to pay a total sum that is many times the value of the purchased goods; or where a bank charges an overdraft fee that is many times the bank’s actual processing costs.
o EXAMPLE: An add-on clause, pursuant to which a merchant is entitled to repossess multiple household items, including furniture, bedding, and a stereo, when a consumer missed a payment, despite the fact that the consumer had already paid nearly 80% of the monies owed for the various purchases.
What may the court do upon a finding of unconscionability?
- refuse to enforce K;
- excise the offending clause and enforce remainder; or
- limit application of offending clause to avoid unconscionable result.
Under which three contexts may public policy be raised as a defense against a contract?
- Context #1: Subject of K itself is specifically prohibited by law.
o EXAMPLE: In most jurisdictions, a contract for prostitution, gambling, or bribery is illegal under the law and accordingly unenforceable in court. - Context #2: K formed for purpose of committing a crime or tort.
o EXAMPLE: A contract between an employer and a hired assassin would be a contract for the commission of a crime. - Context #3: K performance would violate certain values/freedoms designated by the state.
o EXAMPLE: A contract that prohibits one party from marrying for an extended period of time would violate the public policy of promoting free and consent-based marriages.