Other Crimes and Concepts Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Incoate Offenses

A

An act tending toward the commission of a crime that is considered serious enough in itself to justify punishment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Attempt

A

An overt act done with the intent to commit a crime that falls short of competing the crime.
An overt act done with the intent to commit a crime that falls short of completing the crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How to prove attempt

A

1) Must prove that the actor was trying to accomplish the outcome of the crime. (specific intent crime)
2) The overt act cannot be mere preparation
3) Examples of substantial step: lying in wait, reconnoitering, soliciting and innocent person, etc.
2) Colorado: Under Lyerla no such thing as attempted depraved heart murder.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Abandonment

A

Renunciation must be complete and voluntary. Renunciation is not voluntary if acted on by an outside force.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Solicitation

A

A person is guilty of solicitation to commit a crime when he commands, encourages, or requests another person to engage in specific conduct which consititutes such crime or and attempt to commit such crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

People v. Lubow

A

Solicitation, jewel/credit scam:

Actus Rea is satisfied by the communication, no crime is required.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

People v. Decker

A

Solicitation, a man hires an undercover cop to kill his sister:

1) The facts of the case may give rise to two different crimes; Attempted Murder and Solicitation.
1) Mens is satisfied if specific intent to kill his sister existed.
2) Actus is satisfied by an overt act, NOT by mere preparation. The payment of the assassin’s fee was overt.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

People v. Davis

A

Defendant hires someone to hire an assassin for him.
The lack of a murder victim means the last act committed by the defendant was only the crime of solicitation, not the crime of murder. “The Last Act Test.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

People v. Saephanh

A

Attempted Solicitation: a letter from an inmate soliciting a crime is intercepted by the prison, without being communicated to the inteded recipient.
1) Solicitation requires that actual communication must happen, not just attempted communication.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Impossibility

A

Booth v. State: a thief steals a jacket from a car to sell to an attorney.

1) Legal Impossibility: Act, if completed, would not be criminal in nature. (cannot be convicted).
2) Factual Impossibility: Conditions do not allow the act to be completed. (conviction possible)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Conspiracy

A

An agreement between two or more individuals to commit an illegal act at some point in the future and often requiring at least one overt act in furtherance of that agreement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

State v. Verive

A

Attempt is not a lesser included offense of conspiracy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Callanan v. US

A

Conspiracy:

The crime of conspiracy intends to punish the AGREEMENT to conspire, not whether the act itself occurs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Commonwealth v. Donahue

A

Conspiracy: Just because something is unlawful or civilly actionable, does not make it eligible for conspiracy. It must also be “sufficiently immoral” giving the example of someone who preys on groups of people.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Griffen v. State

A

Behaviors of the parties can be sufficient evidence of the existence of a conspiracy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

US v. Recio

A

Termination Doctrine:

A conspiracy terminates once the government intervenes, thus defeating the conspiracy’s objective.

17
Q

US v. Read

A

Withdrawal from a conspiracy must be communicated of reasonably calculated to at least one member of the former conspiracy.

18
Q

Robbery

A

The unlawful taking of personal property from the person or in the presence of another, against his will, by means of force, or violence, or fear of injury, immediate or future, to his person.