Other Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

How to get quasi self defence?

A

V’s behaviour constitutes an

1) immediate threat of death to others
2) encroached on their autonomy (by restricting their movement).

1) threat to D’s security of person
2) encroachment on her autonomy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Kelly and Lindsay

A

There is no property in Corpses, but an exception applied where it has undergone treatment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Assault requirement

A

The apprehension of imminent unlawful violent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Constanza

A

written threats by letter could be an assault. As word presumably text messages.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Is hostility needed in battery?

A

Brown - technically yes, hostility is needed. However, in this case the word was interpreted in such a way as to deprive it of any meaning.

Therefore, from brown was can infer that conduct intentionally causing that degree of harm for the purpose not judicially recognised will be hostile.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What constituted bodily harm?

A

Any hurt or injury calculated to interfere with the health or comfort of D, provided it was more than transient and triffling
- Donovan.

However, CPS charging standards will only prosecute where really significant medical intervention is required, such as stiches.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

GBH wounding

A

A wound requires all the laywers of the skin to be pierced

  • Moriarty v Brooks
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Metherham

A

GBH means “Really serious harm”.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Grundy

A

GBH the totallity of the injuries suffered by V should be taken into accound; look at the circumstances.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Bollom

A

Harm to a child will be more serious than harm to an adult. Grundy applied.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Dica

Konzani

A

Infection of HIV virus is be GBH.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What does inflicting in s20, s18 mean?

A

It means causing = Burstow

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Konzani

A

Where D is aware he might be HIV positive and did not disclose this to V, V’s consent to unprotected sexual intercourse would not be assumed to be informed consent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the mens rea for sexual?

A

D just has to be aware that the circumstances exist.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the requirements for any sex offence?

A

1) act is sexual

2) Lack of consent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

sex s76

A

it is to be conclusively presumed that V did not consent and D did not reasonably believe V consented.

17
Q

What does nature of the act mean?

A

Provided that V understands the essence of the act, V’s consent to that act will not be undermined even if V is mistaken.

18
Q

dica,

Konzani

A

D did not disclose that he may pass on an STI to V, this does not vitiate V’s consent to the sexual act

19
Q

Jheeta

A

V agreed to have sex with D in the mistaken belief, induced by D, that he was suicidal and likely to kill himself unless she agreed. D was nevertheless convicted using the general definition of consent (s74).

20
Q

Bingham

A

Devonald has been limited, D (V’s boyfriend) created a fake online persona (X). X persuaded V to take photos and send it to him, he then threatened to sent the photos on unless she took more. D was behind all of this, D explained he was doign it to make her stand up for herself, but partly also for sexual gratification. Held: distinguishing Devonald, V thought it was for sexual gratification as did D, in part.

Devonald - scope limited to where V fails entirely to apprciate D;s ourpose.

21
Q

Stripp

A

D, because he is drunk, sustains concussion. ca THOUGHT, OBITER THAT D should be acuitted on ground of automatism

22
Q

Can you rely on automatism if you drink yourself into a state?

A

Coley - held that automatism is not available where D has induced an acute state of involvuntary behaviour by his own prior fault.

23
Q

Beard

A

Insanity, even though only temporary, whether produced by drunkenness or otherwise, is a defence to the crime charged. The law takes no note of the cause of insanity.