Other Flashcards
Directive vs Rule
Directive: Frame for national legislation
Rule: Direct Application=Law
Direct Effect
EU citizens have a legal right to expect their governments to adhere to EU obligations
Supremacy of EU Law
If a domestic law contradicts a EU obligation, EU law prevails
Principle of Mutual Recognition
product made and sold in one MS must be allowed to be sold in another
Why do the inst. matter?
Experimentation and Change: Can change Informal powers within institutions instead of making treaty changes
Power-sharing and consensus: EU can switch between Intergovernmental solutions and supranational solutions
Scope and Capacity: EU can avoid decision-making gridlock and can expand policy cooperation without expanding powers of institutions
How Enlargements Effects Institutional Power
Parliament: deals with difficult legislation, and their power is growing
Commission: Was once more cooperative and one whole body, and now resembles Intergovernmental Body (more individual)
Council: bigger the EU, the harder it is for decisions to be made, especially when unanimity is required
Neo-Functionalism:
accumulation of power at supranational level by applying spillover
(More integrated a policy created at supranational level is, more people will ask for integration)
SUPRANATIONAL> MS
GOOD FOR ANALYSIS OF TRANSLATIONAL INTEREST AND SUPRANATIONAL INSTITUTIONS
Functional Spillover
Functional Spillover: Economic Interdependencies
Example: Move from ECSC to EEC and Euratom (coal and steel made them realize an economic community might be a good idea)
Political Spillover
olitical Spillover: Create and strengthen supranational institutions, promotes further integration
Example: Pressure to set up common market from industrialists
Cultivated Spillover:
Supranational actors promote integration beyond what would naturally occur
Intergovernmentalism
Intergovernmentalism: MS are the center of the bargaining. The EU is seen as cooperation amongst states, which are the rational actors. Pooled sovereignty doesn’t diminish the role of the state.
MS> SUPRANATIONAL
GOOD FOR ANALYSIS OF NEGOTIATIONS
Problems: neglects domestic policies
Rational Choice Institutionalism:
Rational Choice Institutionalism: supranational institutions are agents created by MS; MS want to be part of supranational institutions because of the benefits and because of their own agency (similar to intergovernmentalism)
Sociological Institutionalism
Sociological Institutionalism: if you are part of the EU, you must have shared values with the others
Historical Institutionalism:
Historical Institutionalism: Focuses on the role of time, policies are seen as path dependent, and can’t be predicted
Governance Approach:
Governance Approach: governing is interactions of many actors with no clear divide between private and public sectors
EU can be seen as a governance model because EU politics are influenced by the institutions, regions, and interest groups
Private spheres can be even more powerful in policymaking