Osseointegration Flashcards

1
Q

“A direct structural and functional connection between ordered,
living bone and the surface of a load-carrying implant”

A

Osseointegration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the 6 key factors for successful implant osseointegration?

A
  1. Biocompatibility of the Implant material
  2. Macroscopic and microscopic nature of the implant surface
  3. The status of the implant bed in both a health (non-infected)
    and a morphologic (bone quality) context
  4. The surgical technique
  5. The undisturbed healing phase
  6. The subsequent prosthetic design and long term loading phase
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q
  • Low weight high strength/weight ratio
  • Low modulus of elasticity,
  • Excellent corrosion resistance
  • Excellent biocompatibility
  • Easy shaping and finishing.
A

Titanium

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

____ (decreases the specific weight and improves the elastic
modulus)

A
  • 6% aluminum
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

______: (decreases thermal conductivity and increases the

hardness).

A
  • 4% vanadium
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

: tenacious oxides in air or oxygenated

solutions - Promotes adhesion of osteogenic cells

A

TITANIUM OXYDE LAYER

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Should smooth, rough, or moderately rough implant surfaces best for osseointegration?

A

Moderately rough

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

In order for osseointegration to occur, do you want the surface area to be increased or decreased?

A

Increased SA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

A _____ surface roughness
increases the potential for
biomechanical interlocking

A

greater

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

______ implants surfaces have an higher percentage
of bone implant contact and also an higher torque
removal than machined surfaces.

A

Rougher

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What percentage of bone is inorganic?

A

65-70%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What percentage of bone is organic?

A

30-35%

Type 1 collagen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

First, bone matrix is synthesized by only one cell: the ______.

A

osteoblast

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Second, as a result of the polarized synthetic (meaning the
synthesis of bone matrix) activity of osteoblasts, bone
grows only by _____.

A

apposition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Third, bone matrix _______ and has no inherent capacity

to “grow.”

A

mineralizes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

• de novo bone formation occurs on the surfaces of old
bone in the peri-implant site.
• The bone surfaces provide a population of osteogenic
cells that lay down a new matrix that encroaches on the
implant.
• New bone is not forming on the implant, but the latter
does become surrounded by bone.
• Results in bone approximating the implant

A

Distance osteogenesis

17
Q

No bone is present on the surface of the implant upon
implantation
New bone forms first on the implant surface Implant surface
has to become colonized by bone cells before bone matrix
formation can begin
Bone is formed for the first time at the appropriate site by
differentiating osteogenic cells.
surface.
• Results in bone apposition to the implant surface

A

Contact osteogenesis

18
Q

(Osseointegration timeline)
• Threads are in contact with bone - Mechanical anchorage
• Primary mechanical Stability
• The void between the pitch and the body of the implant: a well
defined wound chamber
• Blood clot characterized by : erythrocytes, neutrophils and
monocytes/macrophages in a network of fibrin + leukocytes
engaged in the wound cleaning process
• Blood cloth replaced with primitive granulation tissue 4 days
after : this tissue contained mesenchymal cells, matrix
components and newly formed vascular structures (i.e evidence
of angiogenesis)
• Provisional CT matrix had been established

A

2 HOURS AFTER IMPLANT INSTALLATION

19
Q

(Osseointegration timeline)
Rough : In the proximal region an early granulation
tissue has formed, whilst in the region close to the
device, large numbers of erythrocytes remain
MACHINED: In the area close to the parent bone the
clot has been penetrated by vascular structures
surrounded by fibroblast-like cells, whereas in the area
close to the surface of the device, large numbers of
erythrocytes, polymorphonuclear leukocytes and
macrophages remain.

A

4 days

20
Q

(Osseointegration timeline)
• Provisional CT in the wound chambers rich in vascular structures and mesenchymal cells.
• A relatively small number of inflammatory cells was still present.
• A cell-rich immature bone (i.e. woven bone) was seen in the provisional CT that surrounded the blood vessels.
• Woven bone formation occurred in the center of the chamber as well as in discrete locations that apparently were in direct contact with the surface of the titanium device : “Contact Osteogenesis”
• Contact osteogenesis was not observed on polished implant surfaces at this stage

A

1 week

21
Q

(Osseointegration timeline)
Woven bone formation was more pronounced in all compartment
• Woven bone were noticed in the bone marrow regions ‘apical’ of the implant. This osteogenesis took place at a distance from the implant surface and hence was termed ‘distant osteogenesis’.
• In many regions woven bone was bridging to the surface of the implant.
• At this time point of healing, most of the implant surface was occupied by newly formed bone, which formed a continuous coat on the implant surface (i.e. ‘osteocoating’).
• Osteoclast formation noticed on the pristine bone surfaces, resulting in bone resorption adjacent to the implant surface, especially in areas of pressure of the implant to the bony bed (i.e. pitches of the threads).
• After 2 weeks of healing: Mechanical stability replaced by Biological bonding and stability.

A

2 weekls

22
Q

(Osseointegration timeline)
Continuous cell-rich ‘osteocoating’ covered most of the titanium wall of the chamber.
• The central portion of the chamber was filled with a primary spongiosa, rich in vascular structures and contains a multitude of mesenchymal cells.

A

4 weeks

23
Q

(Osseointegration timeline)
Most of the wound chambers were now filled with mineralized bone.
• Bone tissue consisted of primary and secondary osteons
• Mature bone tissue contact with the implant surface to a very high extent.
• Bone marrow containing blood vessels, adipocytes and mesenchymal cells was observed to surround the trabeculae of mineralized bone.
• The bone trabeculae had become reinforced by lamellar or parallel-fiber bone deposition, thus providing a structure to cope with the bearing of load.

A

6-12 weeks

24
Q

_______ loading – prosthesis connected to the implant fixture within the first 48hrs.

A

Immediate loading

25
Q

______ loading – prosthesis is connected to the implant fixture ater the first 48hrs but prior to 3 months.

A

Early loading

26
Q

______ loading – prosthesis connected to the implant fixture ater the iniral 3 months.

A

Delayed loading

27
Q

Is immediate loading better for single crowns or larger restorations?

A

Larger restorations

28
Q

______ (surgical technique) leaves a cleaner cavity for implant placement, with very few osseous debris.

A

Piezosurgery

29
Q

The ________ can be defined as the measurement of the resistance that the
implant encounters during its advancement in the apical direction by means of a
rotating movement on its axis

A

insertion torque