OSFI.Stress Flashcards
Define the term stress-testing
a risk management technique
==> TO EVALUATE effects on financial condition..
==> due to SPECIFIED CHANGES in risk factors..
==> corresponding to exceptional but plausible events
Describe how stress-testing is a key risk management tool for coverage of overland flooding
Company won’t have historical data
==> identify flood risks using stress-testing models
==> estimate capital required to support flood risk in different scenarios
==> stress-testing could complement publicly available flood data
Identify the 3 responsibilities of the BoD regarding stress-testing program.
- ultimate responsibility for program
- ensures implementation of program by management
- should be aware of key findings
Identify the 3 responsibilities of the Senior Management regarding stress-testing program.
- implement & manage stress-testing program
- identify PAS (Plausible Adverse Scenario)
- develop& implement risk mitigation strategies
Identify 4 rudimentary considerations in stress-testing. (Hint = RUDI)
- Range of perspectives & techniques
- Update framework regularly
- Documentation of methodology should be available
- Infrastructure should be flexible if assumptions or methods change
Identify the 3 considerations in scenario selection.
- Comprehensive
Scenarios should cover all important BUSINESS & PRODUCT lines - NON-HISTORICAL scenarios
Events that haven’t happened but COULD happen - Severe & Sustained DOWNTURNS
Includes large losses, loss of reputation, legal problems
True or False?
It is appropriate to consider only 1 risk in stress-testing program.
NOT APPROPRIATE: stress-testing should consider ALL risks, not just 1 significant risk
CHANGE: consider operational risk also
Identify the 5 focus areas in response to financial market turmoil.
- Risk mitigation
- Securitization & Warehousing
- Reputational risk
- Credit risk & Counter-party risk
- Concentration risk
Identify the 4 OSFI’s considerations in assessing stress-test program
APPROPRIATENESS:
- are scenarios appropriate for institution’s risk profile
VIABILITY:
- are scenarios included compromising viability
FREQUENCY:
- is stress-testing frequent enough for timely management action
SEVERE SHOCKS:
- do scenarios include severe shocks & sustained downturns
Contrast scenario-testing with sensitivity testing
SCENARIO-TESTING:
- significant changes to risk factors
- observe future state including ripple effects & management actions over a longer time horizon
- more complex & comprehensive
SENSITIVITY-TESTING:
- incremental changes to risk factors
- shock is more immediate & time horizon shorter
- simpler fewer resources required