Organizational Design & Leadership Flashcards
Functions of Organizational Structures (I)
Functions of Organizational Structures
Organizations exist to enable a group of people to effectively coordinate their activities and transaction efforts and to achieve organizational objectives.
Organizational structures serve the following three functions:
- Enableorganizationalmembersundertakeseveralactivities
according to a division of labor that defines
- Specialization ▶️ of tasks and functions
- Standardization ▶️ of tasks and functions
- Departmentalization ▶️ of tasks and functions
- Enable organizational members to coordinate their activities through integrating mechanisms, e.g.:
* Hierarchical supervision
* Formal rules
* Procedures - Define boundaries of the organization and its interactions with the environment.
▶️ Focal question: What drives organizational designs?
We will focus on factors that shape organizational designs:
- Environment
Society
policy
Customer
Competition
- Technology
- Motivation
Environment
Environment Dynamics Drive Organizational Design
Environmental factors influence organizational design (and vice versa):
- New modes of working (temporary employment, labor leasing, etc.) * Technological changes
- Changing / advanced education of employees
- Changing traditions and value-systems
- Competition
▶️ How can organizations cope with environmental changes?
Theoretical Background: System Theory Dynamics (I)
- Organizations exist in the form of systems because this enables the reduction of complexity between organizations and environment.
- The boundary between systems and environment is called difference.
- The environment of systems varies (depending on their boundaries).
- Because each system is part of an environment consisting of other dynamic systems (competition, policy, etc.), that collection of systems (= environment) is never static!
- Accordingly, changes in the environment always affect the focal systems (= the organization).
▶️ Therefore, as a collection of dynamic systems, environment is considered as a source of uncertainty for organizations.
Environment
Classification of Environment
- According to System Theory, everything that‘s not part of a focal system by definition is considered to be part of the environment.
- Environment can be described along two classifications:
- Formal Environment
- Content Environment
- Formal Classification of Environment (I)
Principle: Describe the environment along formal dimensions:
Dimension 1: Complexity
* Captures the degree of complexity of the environment
* Includes the number and variety of elements relevant to the environment
Dimension 2: Dynamics
* Captures changes of the environment over time (evolution)
* Dimensions of environmental dynamics:
Stability of Elements, intensity and predictability of changes
Dimension 3: Illiberality
* Captures pressure for organizations to cope with environmental
changes
* Includes intensity of competition, scarce resources, and regulations.
- Content Classification of Environment
Principle: Organizations should only focus on particularly relevant environmental forces
How can organizations identify relevant environmental forces that affect organizations directly?
Checklists of particularly relevant environmental forces include:
- Technological * Ecological
- Regulatory * Macroeconomic
- Socio-cultural
Goal: Reduction of complexity
Formal vs. Content Classification of the Environment (I)
- What can organizations learn from these perspectives?
- Research reveals two conflicting perspectives describing the
relationship between the environment and organizational designs:
Congruence Perspective ↔️ Interactional Perspective
- Congruence Perspective:
Organizational environment is dominating organizational structures. Organizations have to adapt to changes induced by the environment. - Interactional Perspective:
Organizational environment and organizational structures are interacting with each other.
Environment
Mechanic vs. Organic Organizational Structures
Model of Differentiation and Integration
Mechanic vs. Organic Organizational Structures (I)
Mechanic structures
- Strict hierarchy
- Vertical Interaction
- Downward trend of
communication - Final Authority is centralized
- Strong formalization
- Loyalty and obedience
Organic structures
- Functional authority
- Lateral interaction
- Net structure of
communication - Many decision-making centers
- Redefining tasks continuously
- Task dedication
S17 F05
Model of Differentiation and Integration
- Many approaches build upon „Mechanic vs. Organic Organizational Structures“ model from Bruns and Stalker (1961).
*Lawrence and Lorsch (1967) develop the well-known „Model of Differentiation and Integration“
Model of Differentiation and Integration (II)
- Organizations are regarded as „open systems“.
- With increasing size, organizations differentiate itself into separate
sub-systems (differentiation). - The system integrates all these sub-systems and ensures that all sub-
departments work together seamlessly (integration). - The system has to absorb organizational changes induced by the environment.
Model of Differentiation and Integration (III)
Organizations have to cope with different environmental forces…
…and organizational sub-systems have to deal with corresponding environmental elements.
S20 F05
Environment
- Organization
- Market Segment (Customers, Competitors) ( Marketing)
- Science Segment (Production)
- Techno- Economical Segment R&D
Model of Differentiation and Integration (IV)
S 21 F05
Environment and Organizational Design (I)
The characteristics of the environmental segments determine organizational structures of the corresponding (sub-) systems:
S22 F05
Environmental setting:
- Safe and stable
- Complex and dynamic
▶️
Organizational structures of (sub-) systems
- Mechanic
- Formalized
- Centralized
- Flexible
- Organic
- Easy-to-adapt
Environment
Imperative Thesis of Organizational Design
Imperative thesis: The success of organizational design depends on the congruence between the organizational design and its (given) environment.
Issues:
* Environment is not necessarily always imperative.
* Organizations have different options to react to environmental conditions and changes.
* Environment may be influenced by organizational activities (e.g. marketing, lobbying) (Interdependency).
▶️This critic leads to the interactional perspective describing the relationship between organizations and their environment.
a. Functional Organization
- Based on the integration of similar functions into departments. * The departments are responsible for all activities of the
corresponding function. - Each department has its own
- Internal structure * Management
- Objectives
- Plans
- Budget
Manager
- R&D
- Marketing
- Production
- Finance
a. Functional Organizations: Advantages
Environment
a. Functional Organization: Advantages and Disadvantages
a. Functional Organization: Advantages
High levels of interaction within the functions:
* Individual knowledge
* Common functional-specific knowledge
This leads to:
* higher productivity
* feasibility of complex tasks
Peer-supervision and peer-support is feasible for small business units and
employees at the same level
Function-specific norms and values influence commitment and therefore motivation and performance.
a. Functional Organizations: Disadvantages
Functional orientation is suboptimal for (very) big companies
Many reasons may overstress functions:
* Heterogeneous customer needs
* Diversity of the product portfolio
* Geographical diversification
Performance assessment of separate functions is hardly assessable
Managers are highly involved in daily coordination procedures between functions
Therefore, managers may neglect long-term planning (strategy)
Communication and coordination problems between functions Source: Jones/Bouncken (2008)
Environment
Divisional Organizations: Overview
Divisional Organizations: Evaluating Divisional Organizations (I)
S27 F05
Management
⬇️
Product A
R&D
Marketing
Production
Finance
Divisional Organizations: Evaluating Divisional Organizations (I)
Advantages:
* Divisions are closer to the market
* Single divisions can better respond to uncertainty
* Fast reaction to environmental changes
* Accountability is clearly defined
Disadvantages:
* Economies of scale and scope can be lost
* Divisions may end up competing against each other
* Divisions may develop similar products for similar types of customers
* Divisional organization may lead to duplication of internal services
(such as accountin
Customer-Oriented Organization
S30 F05
Technology
Organizational Structure and Production System (I)
- Woodward (1950) investigates the organizational structure of 100
industrial companies in England. - His results reveal a large variety of organizational structures of
exceptionally successful companies (same holds true for less
successful companies).
➡️ Which factors could explain the broad scope?
- Woodward includes the technological structure of the production
system into his investigation: - Single-item and small-batch serial production
- Large-scale and mass production
- Process production
➡️ Production systems determine organizational designs
Organizational Structure and Production System (III)
S34 F05
Organizational Structure and Production System (IV)
- Organizations with either simple or very complex production systems
employed organic organizational structures. - Organizations with medium complex production systems employed
mechanical organizational structures.
➡️ Production system determines the relationship between
technological settings and organizational / managerial structures.
Technology
Technology and Knowledge (I)
This early perspective (Woodward 1950) considers the complexity of the production systems as technology.
Today, this understanding of technology may be obsolete:
* Technology is more than just the production system
* Technology is often considered an intangible asset
Technology
Technology and People
Linking Technology and the Market: Transformative Business Models
- Keeping the understanding of technology from Perrow (1967, 1973) in
mind:
In the transformation process, not organizations but individual people
transform input to output. - Individual people act as intervening factor between technology and
organizational design. - Question: How do they intervene?
Example:
Suppose a hospital purchases a new CAT-scanner. For the proper
operation of the new technological device, specialized personnel is
necessary. Because the established staff is not trained in using the CATscanner, the organization may implement job rotation to train their
employees on the job.
Linking Technology and the Market: Transformative Business Models
- Industry‘s transformation is usually associated with the adoption of a
new technology - But although new technologies are often major factors, they have
never transformed an industry on their own
➡️ No new technology can transform an industry unless a business
model can link it to an emerging market need!
Technology
Linking Technology and the Market: Six Keys to Success
Linking Technology and the Market: Six Keys to Success (I)
- Research selects 40 new business models that seem to have a
potential to transform industries - Looking for recurring features in the models: 6 emerge
- No company displays all of them but a higher number of these
features usually correlate with a higher chance of success at
transformation. - Trends and needs were identified by an analysis of regularly published
industry reports from think tanks and consulting companies such as
the McKinsey Global Institute, PwC, and the Economist Intelligence
Unit.
Linking Technology and the Market: Six Keys to Success (II)
- Personalization: They are better tailored than the dominant models to customers’ individual and immediate needs.
- Closed Loop: Replace a linear consumption process with a closed loop, in which used products are recycled.
- Asset Sharing: Some innovations succeed because they enable the sharing of costly assets. For example, Airbnb allows home owners to share them wit
Linking Technology and the Market: Six Keys to Success (III)
- Usage-based Pricing: Some models charge customers when they use the product or service, rather than requiring them to buy something outright
- Collaborative Ecosystem: Technology improves collaboration with supply chain partners and helps allocate business risks more appropriately
- Agility: Move away from traditional hierarchical models of decision making in order to make decisions that better reflect market needs and allow real-time
adaptation to changes in those needs.
Linking Technology and the Market: Six Keys to Success (IV)
Linking Technology and the Market: Six Keys to Success (V)
Linking Technology and the Market: Six Keys to Success (VI)
S43 to S45 F05
Linking Technology and the Market: Six Keys to Success (VI)
UBER can claim five of the six key features:
- Personalization: Rating of drivers via mobile device.
- Asset Sharing: Drivers use their own cars.
- Usage-based Pricing: Mobile device directs drivers to locations where the
probability of finding a fare is high. - Collaborative Ecosystem: Drivers assume the risk of winning rides, while the
platform helps minimizing that risk through
application of big data. - Agility: Internal decision-making system responds to
market changes in real time.
Technology
Technology
Technology and Management Methods: Agile Working
Technology and Management Methods: Agile Working (I)
- Agile Innovation methods have revolutionized information technology
- They are a radical alternative to command-and-control-style
management - Agile methods such as scrum, kanban, and lean development are
spreading beyond IT to other functions
Technology and Management Methods: Agile Working (II)
Compared with traditional management approaches, agile working offers a number of major benefits, all of which have been studied and documented:
- increases team productivity and employee satisfaction
- minimizes the waste inherent in redundant meetings, repetitive planning, excessive documentation
- brings the most valuable products and features to market faster and more predictably, and reduces risk
Technology and Management Methods: Agile Working (II)
- By engaging team members from multiple disciplines as collaborative peers, it broadens organizational experience and builds mutual trust and respect
- By reducing the time squandered on micromanaging, it allows to devote themselves more fully to higher-value work and improves motivation
Technology
Technology and Management Methods: Agile Manifest
- People over processes and tools
- Working prototypes over excessive documentation
- Respond to change rather than follow a plan
- Customer collaboration over rigid contracts
Technology
Technology and Management Methods: Agile Conditions (I)
Technology and Management Methods: Agile Scrum Framework
S53 F05
Conditions:
- Market environment
Favorable:
- Customer preferences and solution
options change frequently
Unfavorable:
- Market conditions are stable and
predictable
Conditions:
- Customer involvement
Favorable:
* Close collaboration and rapid
feedback are feasible
* Customers know better what they
want as the process progresses
Unfavorable
- Requirements are clear from the
outset and will remain stable
- Customers are unavailable for
constant collaboration
Conditions
- Modularity of
work
Favorable
* Incremental developments have
value, and customers can use them
* Work can be broken into parts and
conducted in rapid, iterative cycles
* Late changes are manageable
Unfavorable
* Customers cannot start testing
parts of the product until
everything is complete
* Late changes are expensive or
impossible
Conditions
- Innovative type
Favorable
* Problems are complex, solutions are
unknown, and the scope isn‘t
clearly defined
* Product specifications may change
* Creative breakthroughs and time to
market are importan
Unfavorable
* Similar work has been done before,
and innovators believe the solutions
are obvious
* Detailed specifications and work
plans can be forecast with
confidence and should be adhered
to
* Problems can be solved sequentially
in functional silos
Conditions:
- Impact of interim
markets
Favorable
* They provide valuable learning
Unfavorable
* They may be catastrophic