ORG exam 1b Flashcards

assessment

1
Q

motor speech disorders

A

Dysarthria(s)–group of spch production disorders resulting from CNS or PNS impairment leading to spch difficulty due to weakness, discoordination, poor tone, poor prosodic control – disorder of spch execution
Anarthria–complete loss of spch due to severe loss of neuromuscular control
Apraxia of Spch – Aphemia–impairment of spch production resulting from lesion in left cerebral hemisphere causing impairment of planning, programming and sequencing of movements for segmental and suprasegmental aspects of spch production; not due to weakness, slowness, or language dysfunction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

SLP assessment goals

A

1) describe characteristics of spch disorder
2) propose differential diagnosis- most likely from list, at times can describe, but difficult to classify Many are mixed dysarthria
3) contribute to medical diagnosis- What neurologic system/disease implicated? If given neuro diagnosis, note what is atypical and suggest alternatives.
4) determine course of management
Neurological etiology, salient Characteristics, Severity of impairment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

SLP assessment: case history ACDSDMIP- all children drink sweet dripping milk in pails.

A

1) age at onset- developmental versus acquired
2) course- kind of onset: chronic/acute
progressive/improving/exacerbating-remitting
3) neurologic diagnosis/pertinent medical history
4) site of lesion/ diagnostic info
5) associated deficits: sensorimotor, cognitive/linguistic, awareness
6) Medications & side effects, med schedule vs tx schedule
7) impact of the spch disorder- target our services, prove to insurance company
8) prior level of functioning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

SLP assessment: oral mech

A

examination of spch structures during nonspch activities- same as swallowing
visual and tactile observation
Universal precautions- gloves etc
fewer auditory judgments
remember: no direct relationship between nonspch findings and spch findings
Are abnormalities sufficient to affect spch?
Think about how this task impacts on spch and on swallowing- The answer may be different for the two (ex no impact on spch, but yes impact on swallowing) because swallow requires strength, spch requires speed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

SLP assessment: oral mech

A

Feature-Motor spch abnormality
CONTROL
*Strength- Reduced, usually consistently but sometimes progressively
*Tone-Increased, decreased, or variable
*Timing
*Steadiness-Unsteady, either rhythmic or arrythmic
MOVEMENT
*Speed-Reduced or variable- increased only in hypokinetic dysarthria
*Range-Reduced or variable (predominantly excessive only in hyperkinetic dysarthria)
*Accuracy-Inaccurate, either consistently or inconsistently
*Symmetry-Asymmetrical movements, appearance
Other
Size-Increased size, atrophy, usually asymmetrical

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

nerve tests: V trigeminal, VII facial, IX glossopharyngeal, X vagus, XII hypoglossal, OTHER

A

Velopharyngeal: CN V & X
impound air, Repeated glottal stops (5/sec) uh-uh: visualize movement
Jaw: CN V open/close mouth bite
Lips: CN VII- Pucker, Smile, puff cheeks
gag reflex: IX & X– may not have gag reflex
Laryngeal: CN X Vagus- cough & coup both bad: laryn prob; cough weak, coup okay: exhalation prob; s/z ratio (Z>S)- integrity of larynx, less air for z bc exhalation is restricted in fricative
Lingual XII: Symmetry Speed Range
Back-Body-Tip
Movements
Lateralize-Elevate-Extend-Retract
IOPI iowa oral perf inst
OTHER- reflexes: aberrent oral motor
Nonverbal oral movement sequences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

perceptual analysis of speech: problems

A
  • -perceptual judgments as to adequacy across spch dimensions: Intelligibility, naturalness
  • -visual & tactile info needed to improve judgments, but most movements still not visible
  • -Primary means for analyzing spch
  • -Exact protocol may vary depending on patient needs
  • -Not a simple process, because must distinguish several dimensions of impairment that are occurring simultaneously
  • -Therefore interjudge agreement might vary
  • -Important to determine both strengths and weaknesses in spch components
  • -Validity and reliability of motor spch assessment tools not well established
  • darley aronson brown rating scale for deviant spch*
  • CAPE-V consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice*
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

voice measures

A

a. vowel prolongation: maximum phonation time
comfortable loudness, pitch level, (> 7-8 s; most adults 20 s); whisper vs non-whispered; note voice quality: laryngeal efficiency; Steadiness/Duration: Respiratory capacity; Affected by age; Tests laryngeal and respiratory systems
b. Pitch range for prolonged vowels /a/
c. Maximum frication time: Prolong voiceless fricative /s/; Prolong voiced fricative: /z/; compute /s/ - /z/ ratio: should be slightly <1.0 if healthy system
d. Loudness range for prolonged vowels
be careful with medically fragile patients for whom these max. effort tasks can be very taxing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

alternating motion rates AMR

A

diadochokinetics: speed, regularity, precision
normal values in table 3-3: 5-7 sylls/sec
Count by time - continue reps as long as possible
Time by count – for 5 secs
Looking for consistency
Syllables/Sec Pa 6.4 Ta 6.2 Ka 5.8
Affected by age: younger = slower
“buttercup” “pattycake”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

citation tasks

A

motor spch programming
imitate words of increasing length
automatic spch activities– forwards and backwards: count 1-20, days of week (easier forward than backward)
apraxia better at forward than backward

singing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

contextual speech

A

language formulation: conversation, narrative samples, picture descriptions, reading
Key sentences: nose occluded vs unoccluded
Make me a Hong Kong cookie (more nasals= more affected)
Buy Bobby a puppy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

stress testing

A

prolonged spch attempts
e.g. count or read for longer period
Note any deterioration over time- speed, resonance, intelligibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Formal assessments: artic

A

Articulatory inventory: fisher logermann more age appropriate than GFTA, *also look at phonemes across contexts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

formal assessments: motor speech

A
  1. Frenchay Dysarthria Assessment (Enderby)
  2. Assessment of Intelligibility of Dysarthric Spch
    (Yorkston & Beukelman, 1981): single words, sentences, % correctly understood, rate - number of words/total speaking time
  3. Apraxia Battery for Adults (Dabul)
  4. Screening Test for Developmental Apraxia of Spch (Blakeley)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Acoustic & Physiologic Analyses of speech

A

requires instrumentation
more available in clinical settings with computer technology and software
electropalatography
videofluoroscopy
aerodynamic measures - respiratory system: volumes/ capacities
subglottal air pressure
requires: pneumotachometer, spirometer, manometer
videonasendoscopy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Acoustic & Physiologic Analyses software

A

CASPER computer assisted speech eval & rehab
- phonation:
jitter- consistency of vibrations over time, measurement of VF length of cycle- pitch
shimmer- measure of consistency of amplitude of opening and closing cycle- volume
signal/noise ratio

Speechmaster 
pitch, volume, harmonics, formants, quality measures
EZ Voice Voice Analysis Software
pitch measures, jitter, shimmer
Spectrograms
17
Q

Quantifying dysphonia

A

Reading or spontaneous Voice sample transcribed (100+)
Note which are nondysphonic
Calculate percentage of ^
Sensitive outcome measure to detect change following treatment
2010, studied in phonotrauma not yet neuro
BUT takes time to transcribe

18
Q

interpretation of speech testing

A
  1. identify deviant spch characteristics (Darley et al)- patterns will suggest dysarthria syndrome
  2. determine spch components involved
    Point-Place System – Pressures/ Valves
    (Rosenbek & LaPointe’s adaptation of Netsell’s model)
    1 - respiration- lungs/diaphragm
    2- phonation (prosody)- vocal folds
    3- resonation- nasal
    4-6 - articulation- tongue teeth etc
    7 - prosody - simultaneous activity at all points
    3) judgment of intelligibility, naturalness, and severity- how understandable is the produced spch?
19
Q

WHO model

A

Disease
Body structure/function–>impairment
Activities/Participation–>restrictions

Contextual factors:
Personal- family
Environmental
-barriers
-facilitators
20
Q

surveys

A
  • communicative effectiveness survey*
  • voice related QOL measure*
  • Voice Activity and Participation Profile -Ma & Yiu*
21
Q

breath support assessments

A

Abdomen/thoracic/Diaphragm/Rib cage
Can it expand? Is there volume for speaking?
Breathing pattern: at rest vs speaking
5 for 5 rule (Kent 1987; Hixon et al 1982)
blow for 5 seconds into 5 cm of water- muscles of inhalation and exhalation are in balance to control Hixon & Hoit Diaphragm Exam