Ontological Argument Flashcards

1
Q

What does the term Ontological mean?

A

The term Ontological stems from the Greek ‘ontologia’, meaning ‘study of being’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What type of argument is the Ontological argument?

A

The Ontological argument is analytic, a priori and deductive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Who was St Anselm of Canterbury and how did he define God?

A

St Anselm of Canterbury was an 11th century scholar and in his work ‘proslogion III’ defined God as ‘that than which nothing greater can be conceived’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What did Anselm believe that his definition proved?

A

Anselm believed that his definition of God proved that God must exist ‘de dicto’ (by definition).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Why did Anselm argue that God must exist?

A

Anselm argued that for God to be the greatest being conceivable, he must exist because something that exists is greater than something which does not.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Why did Anselm refer to atheists as fools?

A

Anselm argued that the atheist argument, by accepting his definition of God, was effectively like saying ‘God, who exists, does not exist’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How did 11th century monk St Gaunilo of Marmoutiers criticise the argument?

A

St Gaunilo criticised the logic of Anselm’s argument, stating that if God were replaced by another object, such as an island, then the logic is found to be flawed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How did Anselm respond to Gaunilo’s criticism?

A

Anselm stated that the Ontological argument only applies to non-contingent beings, it does not work for an island (a contingent being) but does for God ( necessary being).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What other argument does the ontological argument link to and why?

A

The ontological argument links to the Kalam (cosmological argument), which is based on the idea that an infinite chain of causation is impossible, and instead the universe must be finite, stemming from a necessary being which causes all others (God).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is a deductive argument?

A

an argument where if its premises are accepted then its conclusion must be accepted too

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was Renee Descartes’ contribution to the ontological argument?

A

God exists as a ‘supremely perfect’ being, and a supremely perfect being that does not exist is a logical impossibility.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How did Descartes respond to Gaunilo’s criticism of Anselm?

A

By emphasising the importance of God’s existence as a necessary being, and therefore as the only being to possess existence as a predicate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Why was Descartes in favour of the ontological argument?

A

As an enlightenment philosopher he rejected a posteriori, inductive arguments for their reliance on ‘unreliable’ empirical evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How does Gottfried Liebniz support Descartes?

A

Liebniz suggests that a supremely perfect being could exist, for perfections are non empirical, meaning that they cannot be argued to be contradictory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What development did modern scholar Alvin Plantinga put forward?

A

Plantinga used modal logic (a school of thought involving the consideration of possible eventualities) to argue that God must exist`

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Why did Plantinga argue God must exist?

A

It is possible to imagine a world in which God exists, and therefore he must exist in all possible worlds because ‘the greatest possible being must have maximal excellence in all possible worlds’

17
Q

What did Norman Malcolm argue?

A

If God’s existence were not necessary, he would not be God, meaning that either He has to exist or he cannot exist. The only way we could say that God cannot exist is if his existence was a logical impossibility, which Malcolm argues it is not, so he must exist.

18
Q

How did David Hume criticise the argument?

A

Hume argued for the impossibility of ‘defining something into existence’. Furthermore, Hume argued against the idea of a necessary existence, believing there to be no evidence for such a thing and calling the existence of the universe ‘brute fact’.

19
Q

Why does Aquinas reject the ontological argument?

A

God is transcendent, ‘only god can know his own essence so only he can understand the argument’

20
Q

What mistake does Aquinas believe Anselm to have made?

A

Aquinas argued Anselm made a ‘transitional error’ - moving from a definition to proof of existence.

21
Q

What did Immanuel Kant argue?

A

Kant argued that existence is not a predicate, because it does not describe anything meaningful about the subject.

22
Q

What did Kant believe God to be?

A

‘an object of pure thought’

23
Q

What did Gottlob Frege argue about predicates, and why is this relevant to the ontological argument?

A

Existence is a second order predicate and the ontological argument requires it to be a first order one, therefore meaning the argument doesn’t work.

24
Q

What are first and second order predicates?

A

First order predicates: Describe an object

Second order predicates: describe a predicate

25
Q

How did Richard Dawkins describe the argument?

A

‘infantile’, ‘a piece of logomachist trickery without a single piece of evidence from the real world’