OLA ACT 1957 Flashcards

1
Q

what does OLA act 1957 deal with

A

visitors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

define occupier and premises under OLA 1957

A
  • O, must have a sufficient degree of control over promises that he ought to realise that lack of care may result in injury
  • P, fixed or moveable structure including vechiles, vessels or aircraft
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

cases that go under occupier and premises

A

Harris v Birkenhead- occupier doesn’t have to be present on premises

Wheat v Lacon- can have more than one occupier

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

define visitor with relevant cases

A
  • someone who has express or implied permission
  • can be implied through conduct (Lawery v Walker- can be land, ladder or lift ) or allurement which is usually for children (Glasgow Corp v Taylor)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

common duty of care and case

A

occupier owes a visitor a common duty of care, so that they will be reasonably safe using the premises for the purposes of their visit (The Calgarth)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

breach with one cases for warnings

A

(don’t write a lot for this)

  • take into account of risk factors
  • warnings should be clear and explain danger, Rae v Mars (where danger is extreme or unusual, it is not enough for just a warning to be placed)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

SPECIAL CASES (2)- CHILDREN

A
  • Perry v Butlins, children are less careful than adults

- Phipps v Rochester Corp, can assume young children will be accompanied by their parent/ guardian

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

SPECIAL CASE- TRADESPERSON

A

Roles v Nathan, occupier not liable when tradesmen fail to guard against risks they should know about

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

SPECIAL CASE- INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS

A
  • Haseldine v Daw

- occupier not usually liable for faulty work from outside contractor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

for independent contractors, what are the three ways the occupier must show to avoid liability

A
  1. it was reasonable for occupier to employ a contractor
  2. independent contractor is competent
  3. if nature of work allows and isn’t too complex, occupier just make sure it’s done properly
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

defences to 57 act

A

contributory negligence

-consent, occupier has no duty for risks willingly accepted by visitor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

structure for 57 act

A
  1. define occupier and apply
  2. define premises and apply
  3. define visitor and apply
  4. common duty of care
  5. breach factors
  6. has it been breached?
  7. damages
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

tradesperson definition

A

an occupier may expect that a person would appreciate and guard against any special risks ordinarily incident to it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

difference between contractor and tradesperson

A

WHOS INJURED

  • tradesperson= the person doing the job is injured when doing their job
  • contractor= third party/ later visitor is injured due to faulty workmanship
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly