OLA 84 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Definition of trespasser

A

Someone who goes on land without any sort of permission and whose presence is unknown to O or, if known, is objected to

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Who does OLA 84 concern?

A

trespassers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Briefly, what does S.1(1)(a) cover?

A

Compensation for personal injury only

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Briefly, what does S.1(3)(a) cover?

A

Being aware of the danger

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Briefly, what does S.1(3)(b) cover?

A

Someone is near the danger

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Briefly, what does S.1(3)(c) cover?

A

O needs to offer protection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Briefly, what does S.1(4) cover?

A

Standard of care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

S.1(1)(a)

A

Compensation will be awarded for “injury on the premises by reason of any danger due to the state of the premises or things done/omitted to be done to them”, but not for damage to property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

S.1(3)(a)

A

He/she is aware of the danger or has reasonable grounds to believe it exists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

S.1(3)(b)

A

He/she knows or has reasonable grounds to believe the trespasser is in the vicinity of the danger concerned or that he/she may come into the vicinity of the danger

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

S.1(3)(c)

A

The risk is one against which
in all circumstances
he/she may be expected to offer the trespasser some protection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

S.1(4)

A

Take such care as is reasonable
in the circumstances
to see that the trespasser is not injured
by reason of the danger

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How does a lawful visitor become a trespasser?

A

By exceeding permission

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Under what sections do occupiers only owe a duty of care?

A

S.1(3)(a), S.1(3)(b), S.1(3)(c)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Is the standard of care subjective or objective?

A

Objective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Name the three defences for OLA 84

A

.Contributory negligence
.Consent (Volenti non fit injuria)
.Warnings

17
Q

How does contributory negligence work as a defence?

A

Reduces the damages payable to C by such proportions as the judge deems appropriate to reflect C’s responsibility for their injuries

18
Q

How does consent (volenti non fit injuria) work as a defence?

A

Applies if a trespasser appreciates the nature and degree of the risk, more than just it’s existence. They have somewhat consented to voluntary injury

19
Q

Where is the defence of consent defined?

A

S.1(6)

20
Q

How do warnings work as a defence?

A

A warning sign is an effective defence if it warns of the danger in clear terms for the adult visitor

21
Q

How do warnings apply to children?

A

It depends on the age and understanding of the child as to whether they can interpret the sign or not

22
Q

What case demonstrates warnings as a defence?

A

Westwood v Post office

23
Q

Westwood v Post office

A

Facts: An employee was injured after entering a room labelled “only the authorised attendant is permitted to enter”. The door was unlocked
Ratio: The notice is sufficient warning for an adult
Area: Warnings

24
Q

What case defines a trespasser?

A

Addie v Dumbreck

25
Q

what case overruled Addie v Dumbrek?

A

Herrington v BRB

26
Q

what is the ratio of Addie v Dumbreck?

A

No duty of care is owed to trespassers

27
Q

what is the ratio of Herrington v BRB?

A

A duty of care is owed to trespassers

28
Q

Does the occupier need to warn adult trespassers if the danger is obvious?

A

No

29
Q

Which case says the occupier doesn’t need to warn adult trespassers if the danger is obvious?

A

Rattcliff v McConnell

30
Q

What case says that the occupier must take into account the practicality of taking precautions?

A

Tomlinson v Congleton

31
Q

What does Donoghue v Folkstone define?

A

That an occupier is entitled to expect a trespasser not to engage in particularly foolhardy pursuits or ones which the claimant’s expertise or training should make them aware of