OLA 57 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is OLA 57 an extension of?

A

Negligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is OLA 57?

A

A duty of care owed from an occupier to a lawful visitor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is occupiers’ liability?

A

A branch of negligence which states that you owe a duty of care to anybody on your property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What happens if the occupier breaches the DOC?

A

The claimant receives compensation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is an occupier?

A

Someone who may be the owner or tenant of a premises. They are in control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the definition of premises?

A

“any fixed or moveable structure, including any vessel, vehicle or aircraft”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Case for occupier definition

A

Wheat v Lacon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Case for premises definition

A

Wheeler v Copas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Briefly, what does S.2(2) define?

A

Adult visitor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Briefly, what does S.1(3)(a) define?

A

Premises

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Briefly, what does S.2(3) define?

A

DOC owed to child visitors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Briefly, what does S.2(3)(b) define?

A

Tradespeople

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Briefly, what does S.2(4) define?

A

Independent contractors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

S.2(2)

A

An occupier must “take such care
in all circumstances is reasonable
to see that the visitor will be reasonably safe in using the premises
for the purpose which he is invited to be there”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

S.1(3)(a)

A

“any fixed or moveable structure, including any vessel, vehicle or aircraft”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

S.2(3)

A

A special DOC is owed to child visitors. O “must be prepared for children to be less careful than adults [and as a result] the premises must be reasonably safe for a child of that age”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

S.2(3)(b)

A

A tradesman should “appreciate and guard against any special risks ordinarily incident to it so far as the occupier leaves him free to do so”

(AKA, the occupier is not liable for a risk a tradesman knew about and did not guard)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

S.2(4)

A

.”Where damage is caused to a visitor
.by danger due to the faulty execution of any work of construction, maintenance or repair
.by an independent contractor employed by the occupier t.he occupier is not to be treated as answerable for the danger if in all circumstances he had acted reasonably in entrusting the work to the independent contractor and .had taken steps he reasonably ought to in order to satisfy the work was properly done and the contractor was competent”

19
Q

How is an independent contractor different from a tradesperson?

A

Indep contractors specialise in one particular thing

20
Q

What cases define occupier? (3)

A

.Wheat v Lacon
.Harris v Birkenhead
.Bailey v Armes

21
Q

What case defines premises? (1)

A

Wheeler v Copas

22
Q

What cases define adult visitors? (3)

A

.Rochester cathedral v Debell
.Laverton v Kiapasha takeaway
.Cole v Davis

23
Q

What cases define child visitors? (3)

A

.Glasgow corporation v Taylor
.Phipps v Rochester
.Jolley v LB or Sutton

24
Q

What case defines Tradespeople?

A

Roles v Nathan

25
Q

What cases define Independent contractors? (3)

A

.Haseldine v Daw and son
.Bottomley v Tomorden cricket club
.Woodward v Mayor of Hastings

26
Q

What case defines warnings?

A

Rae v Marrs

27
Q

What case defines obvious danger?

A

Staples v West Dorset council

28
Q

What are the 4 defences?

A
  1. Contributory negligence
  2. Consent (volenti non fit injuria)
  3. Warning notices
  4. Exclusion clauses
29
Q

Define the defence of contributory negligence

A

C is partially responsible for the injuries they have suffered so shares the blame with D

30
Q

What happens if contributory negligence is successful?

A

The compensation amount is reduced by the percentage of C’s responsibility (eg. 50% to blame, compensation reduced by 50%)

31
Q

Is contributory negligence a complete or partial defence?

A

Partial

32
Q

Define the defence of consent (volenti non fit injuria)

A

C voluntarily accepts a risk of harm was foreseeable as no injury can be done to one who accepts the risks

33
Q

Is consent a complete or partial defence?

A

Complete

34
Q

What must D provide for proof of C’s consent?

A

A precise risk
An exercising of free will
A voluntary acceptance of the risk

35
Q

Where does consent fail?

A

Where C has no choice but to accept the risk or where a person has a DOC to act and is injured from D’s negligence

36
Q

Are warning notices a complete or partial defence?

A

Complete

37
Q

Where are warning signs defined?

A

S.2(4)

38
Q

Define the defence of warning signs

A

S.2(4)- The warning must “in all circumstances be enough to enable the visitor to be responsibly safe”

39
Q

How is it decided whether a warning sign is sufficient or not?

A

The judge will decide

40
Q

Define the defence of exclusion clauses

A

The occupier can limit or exclude liability for any injury caused to a visitor

41
Q

Are exclusion clauses a complete or partial defence?

A

Complete

42
Q

Where are exclusion clauses defined?

A

S.2(1)

43
Q

What are exclusion clauses used for?

A

Residential occupiers but may apply to child visitors depending on age and understanding

44
Q

Why can traders not use exclusion clauses under S.65 of the consumer rights act?

A

“a trader cannot by a consumer notice exclude liability for death or personal injury resulting from negligence”