Offenses Against the Property and Habitation Flashcards
General Summary of Property Crimes
- Traditional analysis: larceny, embezzlement, false pretenses, receiving stolen property
- Modern statutes: single “consolidated” crime of theft
Larceny Elements
- taking (exercise of control);
- asportation (some movement);
- corporal personal property of another;
- from possession of another;
- wrongfully—either:
- without permission; or
- with permission obtained by deception (larceny by trick); and
- with intent to permanently deprive.
“Taking” and “Asportation” of the Property of Another
- Usually, if D asports the property, there is also a completed taking.
- Sometimes there is no taking because despite asportation D has not exercised real control
- e.g. store clerk moving merchandise across the store to steal is asportation but not taking. But, placing merchandise in your pocket is both.
Asportation
only some movement of the property
Taking
some control adverse to owner
Premises Requirement for a Taking
To complete the taking for larceny, D need not remove the property from the premises.
Possession Rights and Taking
- Larceny is about possession, not title.
- D need only take property from someone with a greater right to possession than D.
- e.g. taking from mechanic with lien is larceny even if the car title is in your name
Intent to Permanently Deprive
At the time of the “taking,” the defendant must have intended to either:
- permanently keep the property himself; or
- do something with the property that would create at least a high risk that the owner would never get the property back.
Taking with intent to return
Taking with intent to return cannot be larceny.
Timing of Taking
- What controls is what the defendant intended to do with the property at the time of the taking, not what actually happened to it.
Risk of Permanent Loss
- WIth larceny, the critical issue is whether the intended use of the property involved a high enough risk of permanent loss to the owner.
“Coincidence” Between Act and Intent
- General Rule: When a crime requires both a particular act and an intent, the defendant must have the required intent when he does the act constituting the crime.
“Coincidence” Between Act and Intent
the Larceny Exception
Exception for Some Larceny Cases: “Continuing Trespass” Rule
- If you take something without permission with the intent to borrow it, but instead keep it, you’re guilty of larceny.
Elements:
- Forming the intent after the taking and during the possession is sufficient only if the original taking was wrongful:
- without consent, or
- with consent obtained by deception
Elements of embezzlement
- Possession of property under trust arrangement;
- Conversion of that property (use of it contrary to the terms of the trust arrangement); and
- with intent to defraud.
Embezzlement intent requirement
Intent to return or replace converted property does not show the lack of the intent to defraud required for embezzlement
Custody/Possession and Larceny/Embezzlement
- A person who has “possession” of the property of another can commit embezzlement but not larceny of that property.
- A person who has only “custody” of the property of another does not have possession and can commit larceny of that property.
- “Possession” requires extensive and discretionary control.
Employee/Employer Embezzlement
- Usually, an employee has only custody of employer’s property and thus commits larceny by taking it.
Elements of false pretenses
- obtaining title to property from another;
- by means of a misrepresentation of:
- a present fact; or
- past fact; and
- with intent to defraud.