Homicide Flashcards
3 Traditional Homicide Offenses
1) murder
2) voluntary manslaughter
3) involuntary manslaughter
Homicide Analysis
- Did D “cause” death of victim?
- If #1 answered “yes,” did D act with “malice aforethought?” [if so, murder unless –]
- If #1 and # 2 answered “yes,” was there also adequate provocation? [if so, voluntary manslaughter]
- If # 1 answered “yes” and # 2 answered “no,” did D either
- act with criminal negligence? [involuntary manslaughter]
- cause death while committing misdemeanor? [involuntary manslaughter]
Three Causation Issues
- “Factual” causation:
- “But for” acts of D, victim would not have died as and when he actually did die.
- Year-and-one-day rule
- Victim must die within a year and one day from the infliction of the injury.
- Proximate causation
- If no causation, D is often guilty of attempted murder.
Proximate Causation Rule
- Proximate causation exists if the victim’s death naturally results from the defendant’s actions,
- even if this occurs in an unexpected manner,
- unless the events are extremely unusual.
Superceding Event
Proximate causation is lacking if a “superseding” factor is interjected into the chain of causation.
Such a factor must be:
- independent of the defendant’s actions;
- unforeseeable; and
- the sole immediate cause of the victim’s death.
Causation of Already Dying Victim
- A defendant who simply speeds up death of dying victim does factually cause the victim’s death
Intended Death that Occurs in an Unexpected Way
(e.g. woman poisons her husband, he is about to die, when woman’s lover shoots him)
- If an intended death occurs in an unexpected way, there may be a lack of proximate causation.
- e.g. woman here would be guilty only of attempted murder because her lover’s actions were a superceding factor
Intervening event that only becomes a contributing cause of death
- Does not break the chain of proximate causation.
Murder
A killing is with “malice aforethought” and therefore murder if the defendant acted with:
- intent to kill; or
- intent to cause serious bodily injury; or
- awareness of extremely high risk that death will result (“abandoned and malignant heart” doctrine or “depraved mind” murder); or
- intent to commit a felony.
Intent to Kill for Murder
- If D acted with one of other malice mental states, intent to kill is not necessary for murder.
- Knowingly engaging in high risk activity can be malice.
Felony murder general rule
General Rule: Accidental deaths caused during commission of a felony are murder.
Felony Murder
Effect of D’s defense to underlying (predicate) felony
If the defendant has a defense to the underlying (predicate) felony, the accidental death cannot be felony murder.
Felony murder foreseeability requirement
- The death must have been foreseeable OR
- some courts instead require the felony to have been “dangerous” as committed.
Felony murder
Cofelon liability
All cofelons are guilty of a felony murder, if the death was foreseeable to them.
Felony Murder Merger Rule
- Felony murder cannot be based on felony assault (or battery) causing death of victim (“merges” into death of victim).