Offender Profiling: top down approach Flashcards
who developed top down profiling?
Douglas in 1986, then edited it in 2006
what is offender Profiling?
- behavioural and analytical tool used when trying to find suspects
- predicts probable characteristics of the criminal using evidence from the scene
top down profiling process?
- conceptual categories of organised and disorganised criminals pre exist in profilers mind
- evidence and other details from scene used to fit categories and determine offender type
steps of TDA
- data assimilation
- crime scene classification
- crime reconstruction
- profile generation
- profiling input
data collected including the descriptions of the crime scene, background info of the victim, details of the crime
- decision profiling model
- profiler goes through data and organises it into meaningful patterns
- e.g. one off or part of a murder spree, time and location factors
2.organised offender
- crime in planned
- victim targeted specifically
- victim likely to be taken to a pre- chosen location
- offenders will be highly intelligent, and deemed socially and sexually competent
- will follow their crime report in media
- disorganised offender
- unplanned crime
- victims more likely to be random
- crime scene will have evidence left behind
- unskilled, unemployed, socially incompetent
3 & 4. criminal profile
- make hypothesis abt how crime took place and likely offender
- evidence used to help create a narrative of the crime
- profile given to police investigating to focus investigation
- use profile to target individuals who match
3 & 4.crime assessment
- new evidence added to profile (adjusted if needed)
- if no one identified, profile reviewed and changed
- profilers plan best way to catch criminals and how they should be interviewed
defining crime as a psychologist
crime: unlawful act that can be punished by the state causes harm to individuals, groups, or society
- must be aware of factors: culture plays a key part in what is deemed criminal, acts may be harmful but not criminal and vice versa
strengths of top-down approach
RESEARCH SUPPORT
- Copson: interviewed 184 us officers, 82% said useful, 90% would use again, offers diff perspective even if it doesn’t lead to the offender
- technique has many benefits, useful in investigations
REAL-LIFE APPLICATION
- meketa: applying TDA to non-violent crimes leads to an 85% rise in cases solved by adding 2 new categories (interpersonal and opportunistic)
- wider application to a variety of crimes, increases external validity
limitations of top-down approach
CAN MISLEAD INVESTIGATIONS
-Robert napper initially ruled out of Rachel Nickell’s murder for being inches taller than the profile
- delays/reduces the likelihood of offenders being caught
CATEGORIES TOO SIMPLISTIC
- canter et al: analysed 100 murders found evidence of distinct organised but not disorganised
- categorisation not the nest approach continuum more appropriate than distinct categories