Offences Against the Person Flashcards

1
Q

Where can the offences against the person be found?

A

Offences Against the Person Act 1861

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the offences against the person?

A

From worst to least worst:

  • s18
  • s20
  • s47
  • Assault and Battery (common law)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Assault:

A

Lord Hope in R v Ireland :
“any act by which a person intentionally or recklessly causes another to apprehend immediate and unlawful violence”
AR: D causing V to apprehend or believe that V is about to suffer some personal violence
MR: Intend or be reckless as to causing the result

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

R v Constanza

A

Facts: D harassed V over a period of 20 months
V suffered clinical depression as a result
D claimed V suffered no immediate threat

Judgment: Guilty of assault

L.P: D caused V to apprehend violence at some point, not excluding the immediate future
- wide definition of imminence should be employed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Battery:

A

Collins v Wilcock
AR: Any unlawful contact with another
MR: Intention or recklessness as to the application of unlawful force to V

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

R v Thomas

A

Confirmed that touching can include touching a persons clothes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Defences to assault and battery

A

Lawful chastisement of children: Codified in s58 of the Children’s Act 2004

Consent to assault and battery: E.g shaking a hand
A.) V’s consent must be expressed or implied to D in a legally recognised manner
B.) V’s consent must be effective: V must have the capacity, freedom and information required to make a choice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

R v Ireland

A

Facts: D made a series of silent calls to V
Convicted of s47
Appealed contending silence cannot amount to assault and psychiatric injury is not bodily harm

Judgment: Conviction upheld

L.P: Silence CAN amount to assault and Psychiatric harm can amount to bodily harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Tuberville v Savage

A

Facts: D put hand on his sword and stated “if it were not assize time I would not take such language from you

Judgment: No assault

L.P: It was assize time so words negated the assault

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

R v Light

A

Husband held a shovel over wife’s head and said “if there wasn’t a copper outside I’d have your head in”
-> Threat suspended for only a short amount of time so still assault

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

DPP v K

A

Put acid into a hand dryer and left it
next person who used it got burned

Battery was found

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

s47 Assualt occasioning actual bodily harm

A

AR and MR of assault or battery + V suffers ABH, as a result = s47 liability
occasioning = causing
ABH includes: scratches, bruising, cutting hair, psychiatric injury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is ABH?

A

DPP v Smith: “term requires no explanation”

R v Miller: “any hurt or injury that is calculated to interfere with the health or comfort of V”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

R v Roberts

A

Facts:- D made unwanted sexual advances towards V and tried to take off the coat of V who jumped out fo a moving car suffering grazes and concussion (ABH)
-D claimed he did not foresee the risk V would jump out

Judgment: Guilty of s47

L.P: -Does not require D to foresee that his acts will cause ABH
(confirmed in Savage and Parmenter)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

R v Chan-Fook

A

Fear cannot amount to ABH it has to be a recognised psychiatric injury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

DPP v Smith

A

Cutting off of ex-girlfriends ponytail

-> Amounts to ABH

17
Q

s20: Wounding or inflicting grievous bodily harm

A

AR: D unlawfully wounds V OR D unlawfully inflicts GBH
MR: D intends or foresees some harm (reckless)
= s20 liability

18
Q

s18: Wounding or causing grievous bodily harm with intent

A

AR: D unlawfully wound OR D unlawfully causes GBH
MR: with intent to do GBH or resist apprehension
= s18 liability

19
Q

Eisenhower

A

Unlawfully wounds: Was causing vessels in the eye to bleed a wound?
Courts said no -> all layers of the flesh need to be broken

20
Q

R v Barnes

A

Concerning a late sliding tackle during sports:
Courts held only if conduct was so serious it required criminal intervention
-> not a late tackle

21
Q

Defences:

A
  • Self-defence - if so, force is not unlawful
  • Every day contact
  • Necessity
22
Q

DPP v Parmenter

A

Adds on to the test for recklessness:

Doesn’t matter if they foresee the magnitude of harm as long as some harm is foreseen