Homicide Flashcards
What is Murder?
- ) Causing the death of a living human being through an act or omission
- ) The killing is unlawful - meaning no legal defence is present
- ) Accused has the intention to kill OR to cause GBH
- ) Under the Queen’s peace
Voluntary manslaughter
Via defences to murder:
- ) Diminished responsibility
- ) Loss of control
- ) Killing in pursuance of suicide pact
Involuntary manslaughter
- ) Constructive manslaughter
- ) Gross Negligence
- ) Subjective recklessness
Defence of Diminished Responsibility
s2 Homicide Act 1957:
- ) An abnormality of mental functioning caused by a recognised mental conditioning
- ) which provides an explanation for the defendant’s acts or omissions in being party to the killing
- ) which substantially impaired his/her mental ability to either:
a. ) Understand the nature of their conduct or
b. ) Form a rational judgment or
c. ) Exercise self- control
Defence of Loss of Control
s54 Coroners and Justice Act 2009:
- ) The D must show his/her acts or omissions resulted from a loss of self-control and
- ) The loss of self-control must result from a qualifying trigger and
- ) A person with the defendant’s age and sex with normal powers of tolerance and self-control and placed in the D’s circumstances would have responded to the trigger in the same or similar way
Qualifying triggers under s54:
- ) Fear of serious violence
- ) Something said or done which constituted circumstances of an extremely grave character and caused D to have a justifiable sense of being seriously wronged
- ) A combination of the above two
Can sexual infidelity qualify?
Sexual infidelity is not something said or done that can amount to this trigger - s55(6)
what is Unlawful Act Manslaughter?
- ) An act (not an omission) that causes the death of a living human being
- ) The act is unlawful
- ) The act intentional or reckless
- ) The reasonable person would consider the act as liable to cause some physical injury
For UAM can an omission suffice?
NO - per Lowe
R v Adomako
Facts: -D failed to notice a tube supplying oxygen was no longer supplying to V and as a result, they died
Judgment: Guilty of GNM
L.P: -Clarifies the test for GNM
- ) The offender had a duty of care over the victim
- ) The offender breached this duty through act or omission
- ) The breach caused the death of the victim
- ) The breach of the duty was gross in nature, in the opinion of the jury
R v Wacker
Facts: -D was smuggling illegal immigrants into the country in a lorry but accidentally shut the air vents leading to some dying
Judgment: Guilty
L.P: - In civil law, no duty would be found because of a joint criminal enterprise, however one was found under criminal law meaning criminal law has a wider understanding of duty of care
Andrews v DPP
What is gross?
“simple lack of care as will constitute civil liability is insufficient”
R v Willoughby
Facts: -D burned down his own pub to claim insurance money, V died in the fire
-D claimed no DOC for GNM
Judgment: Appeal dismissed
L.P: -Once judge has decided a DoC is capable of being raised -> up to jury to decide if one exists
R v Church
Fatcs: -D knocked a woman unconscious but thought he’d killed so to dispose of the body threw her in the river
Judgment: Guilty UAM
L.P: -Case that shows UAM
R v Dietschmann
Was no requirement for abnormality to be sole cause of killing as long as it was one cause