Occupiers Liability Act 1957 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What case defines what an occupier is?

A

Wheat v Lacon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

Wheat v Lacon

A

The defendant owned a pub run by a manager. The manager took in paying guests, who stayed in rooms on the first floor of the property. One of the paying guests fell down the staircase and was killed. It was held that both the defendant and the manager were occupiers as they had control over the premises.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What case is used as an example of the extent of the occupiers duty?

A

Lewis v Six Continents

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Lewis v Six Continents

A

A hotel owner failed to ensure that an upstairs window had restricted openings did not breach his duty when the claimant who was an adult man fell out the window.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What cases are examples of standard of care?

A

Cunningham v Reading Football Club
Murphy v Bradford Metropolitan Council
Clare v Perry

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Cunningham v Reading Football Club

A

The claimant police officers were working during a football match. They were injured when members of a crowd threw lumps of loose masonry at them. It was discovered that the stands were in poor condition which led to loose lumps of masonry being easily used as missiles. It was held that the club was in breach of its duty. It was reasonably foreseeable that the crowd would be violent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Murphy v Bradford Metropolitan Council

A

A school caretaker had cleared snow twice from a notoriously slippery path before 8:30am. The claimant was injured when they fell. It was held that the school should’ve taken more care. The nature of the path, the numbers of people using it and the severity of the weather demanded more care should’ve been taken.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Clare v Perry

A

A guest at a defendant’s hotel, chose to exit the hotel one evening by climbing over a perimeter wall instead of using the official exit. She had not realised there was a six-foot drop and fell suffering serious injuries. She sued and it was held that the defendant was not liable as the claimant had behaved in a foolish way that was not reasonable foreseeable for the defendant to guard against.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What case is an example of risk assessment and compliance?

A

Bowen v National Trust

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Bowen v National Trust

A

A tree branch fell, without warning, on a group of school children. Three were injured and one died. It was held that the National Trust were not liable as the tree inspectors took reasonable care when assessing safety in the park and the injury was not reasonably foreseeable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What cases are used as examples of occupiers owing a higher duty of care to children?

A

Glasgow Corporation v Taylor
B v JJB Sports

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Glasgow Corporation v Taylor

A

Where a child died after eating some berries in the botanical gardens in Glasgow. The corporation were liable for not fencing off or placing warning signs near the shrub.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

B v JJB Sports

A

Where the claimant, a boy aged 10, slipped on a wet floor between indoor football pitches and sustained head injuries. The premises were owned by the defendant. It was held that the defendant was liable under the act as it was foreseeable that the floor might be damp after cleaning and failed to allow children being less careful than adults. Signs were insufficient to guard against enthusiastic children.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What cases are examples of it being reasonable to assume that very small children will be supervised by adults?

A

Phipps v Rochester Corporation
Bourne Leisure Ltd v Marsden

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Phipps v Rochester Corporation

A

A 5 year old boy was injured when he fell into a trench on the defendant’s land. He was not being supervised by an adult. The Corporation was not liable as an occupier is entitled to assume that prudent parents would not allow their children to go unaccompanied to unsafe places.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Bourne Leisure Ltd v Marsden

A

The Marsden family were staying at a caravan park owned by Bourne Leisure. While Mrs Marsden was talking to another camper, her 2 year old son wandered off, fell into a nearby pond and drowned. It was held that Bourne Leisure was not liable. They did not have duty to fence the pond or give a precise location of it. All visitors had been given a map showing ponds, river, and beach. It would have been clear to any parent that it was dangerous to let small children wander off.

16
Q

What case is an example of liability for contractors?

A

Roles v Nathan

17
Q

What case is an example of warnings not being required for obvious risks?

A

Trustees of Portsmouth Youth Activities v Poppleton