Occupiers liability Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

what is essentially occupiers liability

A

the liability of an occupier of premises for any injury or damage done to another person whilst on their premises

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what are the two acts that governs occupiers liability

A

occupiers liability act 1957 and 1984

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what case defines who an occupier is and why

A

Wheat v Lacon - it says an occupier has sufficient degree of control over premises such as to make him under a duty of care to those who come lawfully on this premises

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what does AMF International v Magnets Bowling Co say

A

Two or more persons could be in occupation of premises depending on the purpose of the act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what section tells you the definition of premises

A

s1(3)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what does the case of copas v wheeler say

A

d negligent for failing to provide adequate ladder - ladder considered as premises

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what sections of the act tells you what a vistor is

A

s1(2), 2(6) + s5(1)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what case proves the persons using a public right of way is not a visitor and why

A

Greenhalgh v british railway board

Was not a visitor because they used to commodation bridge that was for the convenience of the public

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what was held in the case of holden v white

A

the milkman was exercising a right of way on private premises but still not a visitor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Why is someone’s permission a question of fact

A

permission is a question of fact whether a persons entry has been impliedly permitted or not

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what happened in the case of robson v hallett

A

Occupiers gives out implied liability to members of public whom are on lawful business

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what was proven in the case of edward v railway executive

A

mere knowledge of occupier not sufficient to be permission

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what was said in the case of lowery v white

A

both knowledge + adequate steps to keep visitors out must be shown

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what case proves that visitors could be visotrs if they had honest belief they had been invited

A

Ferguson v welsh

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what was said in the calgrath

A

permission could only be limited in terms of time, space and purpose

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what was said in the case of Glasgow corp v taylor?

A

what may not be a danger to an adult may be a danger to a child

17
Q

what can the damage be when it comes to occupiers liability?

A

personal injury/damage to property

18
Q

what was said in the case of awain v natui ram puri

A

the phrase ‘reasonable grounds’ requires proof of actual awareness in the defndants of facts from which it might be inferred that they had reasonable grounds to believe the plaintiff mgith come into the vicinity…