defamation Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

what case has the definition of defamation

A

SIMS V STRETCH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is the definition of defamation made in sims v stretch

A

publication of material which refects on the plaintiff’s reputation so as to lower the plaintiffs in the estimtaion of right-thinking members of society generally

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what must the publication cause

A

publication must cause or be likely to cause serious harm to the reputation of the claimant (or if a financial body must cause serious financial loss)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what are the two types of defamation

A

libel and slander

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is libel

A

Defamatory material in permanent form such as written/printed statements/posters/pictures/TV or radio broadcasts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is slander

A

defamatory material in transient form - usually spoken in words, gestures or sign language

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what can libel where slander cannot

A

libel can be punished as a crime where slander is only tort

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what must there be for there to be libel and or slander

A

there must be actual serious harm caused or likely to be caused by the publication

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what was said in the case of spring v guardian

A

plaintiff will not be allowed to sue in negligence instead of defamation so as to deny a defendant his right to pleaad one of those defences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what are the three things the plaintiff must prove for defamation

A

the material he complains about was defamatory, was referred to him and was published to a third person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

how do you prove that something was defamatory

A

cause serious harm or likely to cause serious harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

case example of successful defamation claim

A

cassidy v daily mirror newspapers ltd

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

can there be defamation if the words may be innocent at first sight?

A

yes, words could be innocent at first sight, but may bear some secondary meaning if they are considered in the light of additional facts known to person to whom the statement is made or published

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is it called when words could be innocent at first sight, but bear secondary meaning

A

true/legal innuendo

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what is a case example of true/legal innuendo

A

Toley v fry

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what does it mean to be a false innuendo

A

where the plaintiff seeks to argue that the words themselves given an impression of, or mean something different from their ordinary and natural meaning

17
Q

how can defamation be referred to the plaintiff

A

directly or indirectly

18
Q

what happened in the case of Morgans v Odhams Press Ltd

A

direct defamation as the class of readers were likely to read the defamation

19
Q

what other cases are examples of reference to the plaintiff directly or indirectly

A

Hayward v thompson and hulton v jones

20
Q

what is a case example for defamation of a class of persons

A

Knuppfer v London express newspapers ltd

21
Q

what happened in the case of Knuppfer v london express

A

appeal was dismissed as defamation is only applicable to a plaintiff and not a group of people

22
Q

when would a person be liable when he statement is published to a third person

A

a person will be liable if he intends or ought reasonably to have foreseen that the statement would come to a third party’s attention

23
Q

what does the case of Huth v Huth say

A

letter was very lightly closed, it wasnt considered as half open and therefore defamation could not have occured as it would have been difficult to foresee that a third person would have been able to read the letter

24
Q

is it defamatory to re-publicate something

A

under the case of slipper v bbc, yes it would still be defamation if something was re-publicised because it could be argued that it was reasonably foreseeable that the defamation would occur

25
Q

what was held in the case of byrne v deane

A

words of verses could not constitute for defamation

26
Q

can consent be a defence of defamation

A

yes under the case of chapman v ellesmere

27
Q

What does absolute privilege mean

A

when there could be a complete defence

28
Q

when can there be a complete defence

A

Parliamentary proceedings, judicial proceedings, official communications, fair and accurate newspaper reports or broadcast reports by radio or television of judicial proceedings or reports of the parliamentary commissioner for administration and of the commissioners for local administration

29
Q

case example for parliamentary proceedings to be a complete defence

A

Hamilton v Al fayed

30
Q

case example of judicial proceeding to be a complete defence

A

addis v crocker

31
Q

case example for official communications to be a complete defence

A

chatterton v secretary state of india

32
Q

wht was held in the case of watt v longsdon

A

a speaker is privileged to make defamatory statements about another when the speaker had either a duty or an interest to publish the statements. privileged to make defamatory statements about another when the speaker had either a duty or an interest to publish the statements.

33
Q

when can a qualified privilege be lost

A

The privilege may be lost if: (1) they go beyond the limits of the duty of interest; or, (2) they may be published with express malice, so that the occasion is not being legitimately used, but abused.

34
Q

what does it say about defamation in parliament or judicial proceedings

A

A) fair and accurate reports of proceedings in parliament enjoy a qualified privilege;
b) fair and accurate reports of judicial proceedings also enjoy qualified privielege

35
Q

however, when what is proved by the claimant, will the qulified privilege be defeated

A

when Malice is on D’s part - horrocks v lowe

36
Q

can an apology be used as a defence for defamation

A

yse, but rarely used in practice - a genuine apology may,however, help mitigate the damages