Obtains by deception - property Flashcards
Obtains by deception - property section
s240(1)(a) CA 1961
Obtains by deception elements
without claim of right
obtains
ownership OR possession of OR control over
any property OR any privilege, service, pecuniary advantage, or benefit, or valuable consideration
Definiton of deception
as per s240(20 CA 1961
Deception means:
a) a false representation whether oral, documentary, or by conduct where the person making the representation intends to deceive any other person and -
- knows that is false in material particular or
- is reckless as to whether it is false in material particular
b) an omission to disclose a material particular, with intent to deceive anyone
c) a fraudulent device, trick, or strategem
Representation
not defined.
examples include representations about a past or present fact, a future event, or about an existing intention, opinion, belief, knowledge, or other state of mind.
Simester and Brookbanks say that a representation must be what?
It must be capable of being false so it must contain a proposition of fact
False representation, what does the defendant need to believe
must be false
defendant must know or believe that it is false in material particular, or be reckless as to whether it was false
What must you prove for obtains by deception property
- there was intent to deceive
- there was a representation by the defendant
- the representation was false, and the defendant either;
a) knew it to be false in material particular OR
b) was reckless whether it was false in material particular
R v Morley intent to decieve
An intention to deceive requires that the deception is practised in order to deceive the affected party. Purposeful intent in necessary and must exist at the time of the deception
R v Morley representation by the defendant
Representations must relate to a statement of existing fact, rather than a statement of future intention.
Continuing effect
Representation by words or conduct may have a continuing effect (eg restaurant example)
Silence
As a general rule silence or non disclosure will not be regarded as a representation, but there are exceptions eg an incorrect understanding is implied form a course of dealing and defendant failed to negate or correct the understanding
Defendant knowledge
Prosecution must prove that the defendant knew the representation was false in material particular or was reckless to its falsity absolute certainty is not required.
R v Crooks defendant knowledge
Accused may also be liable if their conduct amounted to wilful blindness
Material particular definition
a matter will be a material particular if it is something important or something that matters
Device definiton
a plan, scheme, trick