Miscellaneous Questions Flashcards
Roberts car is in the local garage having been repaired. Robert could not afford to pay for the repair before getting the car back. Knowing that he does have funds in his account to cover the cost of the repairs, he hands over a cheque to the repairer and received the car in return. He drives home:
Robert has stolen the vehicle, as someone else has a special property or interest in it
To prove a charge of theft by a person in a special relationship under section 220(1), it is necessary to prove that the person knew they had to:
Account to any other person for the property, or for any proceeds arising from the property
The case R v Morley (2009) NZCA 618 discussed the matter of loss in relation to s240(1)(d) Crimes Act 1961 (causing loss by deception). Which statement best describes what was held in this matter:
The prosecution must prove that the loss alleged by the victim must have been induced by, or caused in reliance, upon the deception
Brown booked into a motel and on checking in he offered to pay in advance. He was told that he could pay the account in the morning. He left early without checking out or paying. What is Brown’s liability?
No offence is committed
For a charge under section 240(1) (b) of the Crimes Act 1961 (obtaining credit by deception), the obligation to repay means:
The obligation to repay must be a legally enforceable one
A fraudulent device, trick or stratagem used with intent to deceive any person must be:
Fraudulent and morally wrong
False document includes a document of which the whole or any material part purports to be made:
a) By a person who did not authorise its making
b) By a fictitious person
c) Both of the above are correct
C is correct
The serious fraud office investigates serious or complex fraud complaints. An investigator from that office may only make an arrest of a fraud suspect:
Under no circumstances as the investigator does not have powers of arrest
Where a person has been induced to part with goods by deception, what are two steps he can take to avoid the deceiver’s title
- Take all other possible steps to bring it to the Offender’s notice, e.g. by writing a letter
- Advise the police that the goods were obtained by deception.
To successfully prosecute a person on a charge of (using altered or reproduced documents with intent to deceive) under section 259 of the Crimes Act 1961, name three mental elements you must prove:
Firstly, the defendant must know that the document had been altered with intent to deceive.
Secondly, the defendant must have intended by the employment of the document, or by causing another to use or rely on it, to obtain by deception any property, privilege, service, pecuniary advantage, benefit or valuable consideration or to cause loss to any other person.
Thirdly, there must be an intention to acquire or retain the property etc, or to cause loss, “by deception”.
How is the term (representation) interpreted (not defined) by the courts. State the relevant case law in your answer
This is not defined. Examples have included representations about a past or present fact, about a future event, or about an existing intention, opinion, belief, knowledge or other state of mind. It must be capable of being false so it must contain a proposition of fact: Simester & Brookbanks, Principles of Criminal Law, 2007, p702.
R v Morley
Representations must relate to a statement of existing fact, rather than a statement of future intention.
An offender knowingly presents to the retailer an item with two price tags for different amounts, aware that the higher amount is the correct price, he shows the lower price to the checkout operator and obtains the item for the lower price. He is apprehended by Police some two days later for this offence
a) What offence has the offender committed
b) Who has title to the item obtained by the offender
a) Obtains by Deception
b) Title would belong to the Offender which has been obtained by deception.
The prosecution must establish either that the defendant knows or believes his representation is false in a material particular, or is reckless as to whether it is false. State your understanding in relation to the term (false in a material particular)
The prosecution must establish either that the defendant knows or believes his representation is false in a material particular, or is reckless as to whether it is false. A minor detail may amount to a “material particular” if it is of consequence to the facts of the case. The question of materiality will be assessed objectively.
Material particular is not defined in the Crimes Act and can be given its usual meaning of an important, essential or relevant detail or item.
R v Mallett
Investigations into company fraud complaints will usually involve enquiries with the Ministry of Commerce. State four possible sources available there:
Registrar of Companies.
Companies Office.
Official assignee.
Insolvency Services.
a) What ‘knowledge’ must an accused person have to be liable for making a false representation
b) How can ‘knowledge’ be established?
a) The Accused must know or believe that it is false in a material particular, or be reckless whether it is false. Absolute certainty is not required and wilful blindness as to falsity of the statement will suffice.
b) Knowledge can be established by: * An admission * Implication from the circumstances surrounding the event * Propensity evidence (see page 39).