Observational techniques and design Self-report techniques and design Correlational analysis Flashcards
What is assocation
association is the illustrates the strength and direction of an association between two co-variables
what is a scattergram
correlations are plotted on a scattergram. one co variable is on the x axis the other on the y axis.
what are the types of correlation
positive correlation
negative correlation
zero correlation
what is positive correlation
co variables rise or fall together
what is negative correlation
one co variable rises and the other fall
what is zero correlation
no relationship between the two variables
/ - what type of correlation
positive
- what type of correlation
negative
-/-/ what type of correlation
zero
What are the differences between correlations and experiments?
- in an experiment the researcher manipulates the IV and records the effect on the DV. In a correlation there is no manipulation of variables and so cause and effect cannot be demonstrated like in experiments.
- in a correlation the influence of the EVs is not controlled, so it may be a third untested variable causing the relationship between co variables- called an intervening variable
What are the positives of correlation
- useful starting point for research: by assessing the strength and direction of a relationship, correlations provide a precise measure of how two variables are relates, if variables are strongly related it may suggest hypotheses for future research
- relatively economical: unlike a lab study, there is no need for a controlled environment and no manipulation of variables is required, correlations are less time-consuming than experiments
negatives of correlations
- no cause and effect: correlations are often presented as causal, there may be intervening variables that explain the relationship
- method used to measure variables may be flawed, for example the method used to work out an aggression score might be low in reliability, this would reduce the validity of the correlational study.
What is a correlation
the analysis of the relationship betweej co variables
what is an observational technique
a way of seeing or listening to what people do without having to ask them. observations are often used within an experiment as a way of assessing the DV.
positives of an observation
can capture unexpected behaviour: people often act differently from how they day they will in self-report methods, observations are useful as they five insight into spontaneous behaviour
negatives of observations
risk of observer bias: researcher’s interpretation of the situation may be affected by expectations, bias may be reduced by using more then one observer.
What are the types of observational techniques
naturalistic controlled covert overt participant non-participant
What is a naturalistic observation
takes place where the target behaviour would normally occure
What is a controlled observation
some control/manipulation of variables including control of EVs
What is a covert observation
participants are unaware they are being studied
What is a overt observation
participants are aware of being studied
What is a participant observation
when the researcher becomes part of the group they are studying
What is a non-participant observation
when the researcher remains separate from the group they are studying
Advantages of a naturalistic observation
high external validity- in a natural context, behaviour is likely to be more spontaneous, more generalisable to everyday life
Advantages of a controlled observation
can be replicated - more easily repeated due to standardised procedures, findings can be checked to see if they occur again
Advantages of a covert observation
demand characteristics reduced- participants do not know they are being watched so their behaviour will be more natural, this increases the validity of their findings
Advantages of a overt observation
more ethically acceptable- participants have given their consent to be studied, they have the right to withdraw if they wish
Advantages of a participant observation
can lead to greater insight- researcher experiences the situation as the participants do, this enhances the validity of the findings
Advantages of a non-participant observation
more objective- researcher maintains an objective distance so less chance of bias