Observation Flashcards

1
Q

Inductive reasoning

A

when you make true statements based on observation which logically support a conclusion but this conclusion can be proved false, however the state,ents themselves may still be true

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Deductive reasoning

A

when you start with a true starting conclusion and seek evidence through observation to make statements to support the final conclusion, the statements are intended to logically guarantee that the conclusion is true

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is Aquinas’ fifth way?

A

the argument from harmony-
the world is generally harmonious working towards a purpose, there must be something that exists by which all things are directed towards as their end goal/purpose - God

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What analogy can be used for Aquinas’ fifth way?

A

a bow and arrow

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What was Aquinas influenced by?

A

Aristotles four cause telos

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Is Aquinas’ fifth way inductive or deductive?

A

inductive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Strengths of Aquinas’ fifth way

A
  • anyone can observe order in the world
  • it is relatively easy to observe the natural world working to a purpose
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Weaknesses of Aquinas’ fifth way

A
  • Aquinas doesn’t directly say what the purpose of the world is other than God
  • there is evidence that humans, animals and plants adapt over time to pass on the most successful traits for survival, therefore giving the illusion of design when there is none
  • Aquinas ignores cases where the purpose of the natural world is not good
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is Paley’s design argument?

A

the watch analogy & the eye analogy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are Hume’s three criticisms of Paley’s argument?

A
  • aptness of analogy
  • the epicurean thesis
  • argument from effect to cause
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What does Humes aptness of analogy mean?

A

analogies are not ‘apt’ (appropriate or sufficient) because they move from a situation we know or have evidence about to one we simply do not

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What does Hume’s epicurean thesis mean?

A

in order for the world to exist at all it would need to world together - without the world working together at some point we would not be here to observe the world that did not seem designed or did not seen to be working together. the universe was made simply by chance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What does Hume’s argument from efficient to cause mean?

A

we cannot go from looking at the effects of something to proposing a cause without evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are Mill’s criticisms of the design argument?

A

argues that the premises of the arguments by Aquinas and Paley while may be true to an extent and not the only observations we can make

he argued that natural evil can lead us to conclude that…
* the creatorof our universe is flawed in some way as they are unable to design a perfect universe
* there is simpy no designer at all

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is Darwin’s argument?

A
  • design arguments are flawed because they approach nature as if it was created all at once but actually it evolved iver time, weaking the argument for a designer
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Strengths of the design argument

A
  • his argument is simple
  • he makes the conclusion that the designer of the universe is transcendent - people are likely to agree that someone at the same level as humans would not have the ability to create the universe
  • recognises the complexity of the world and say that things cannot be this complex without a design
16
Q

Weaknesses of the design argument

A
  • the designer of the world is not necessarily God - some may argue that it could be another higher being or a group of higher beings
  • how can there be evil in the world if the designer is all-loving and all-powerful
  • jumps from observation to cause withour evidence
17
Q

What is the theory of natural selection?

A

the most succesful species stay alive as they can adapt to their surroundings. these species pass on their mutations to their offspring

18
Q

What does Tennant argue about natural selection and its link to God?

A
  • natural selection and evolution show us that there is a God as evolution is evidence of a desiger; God
  • the world has evolved in such a way that it is the perfect habitat for human life to flourish which shows that it must have been designed for the purpose of humans
19
Q

What is the principle of Ockham’s Razor and who uses it?

A
  • the theory with the smallest amount of assumptions is the one mostly likely to be correct (essentially the simplist idea)
  • used by Swinburne
20
Q

For Swinburne, which argument is the most possible solution for the creation of the world and why?

A

evidence of design (Paley) and evidence of universal rules (Aquinas) because they are the simplist arguments (Ockham’s Razor)

21
Q

What is Aquinas’ cosmological argument made up of?

A

three ways:
1. prime mover
2. first cause
3. necessity and contingency

22
Q

What is Aquinas’ first way?

A

Prime Mover:
* everthing has to be moved by something
* it cannot be endless or go to infinity (infinite regress)
* there has to be a first mover that itself is unmoved; God

23
Q

What is Aquinas’ second way?

A

First Cause:
* everything must be caused by something
* everything has a cause that is different from itself
* it is impossible for something to cause itself
* there must be a first cause which is itself uncaused; God

24
What is Aquinas' third way?
Necessity and Contingency: * things which exist have the possiblity to not exist * something has had to always exist to allow everything else to exist and that must be God
25
What is Leibniz's principle of sufficient reason?
* everything is part of a chain of cause and effect * there is a reason for the existence of all things, and this reason must be sufficient
26
Strengths of Aquinas' first way (Prime Mover)
* uses empirical evidence * inductive argument * science has been unable to identify a specific and certain cause of the universe, therefore it is possible to suggest it is God * other philosophers have also observed motion in the world (e.g. Plato)
27
Weaknesses of Aquinas' first way (Prime Mover)
* we have not observed everything in the universe * does the prime mover have to be God? * doesn't explain how the unmoved mover is itself unmoved
28
Strengths of Aquinas' second way (First Cause)
* empirical evidence * inductive * can experiecne this directly
29
Weaknesses of Aquinas' second way (First Cause)
* Hume argued that inductive arguments only predict what will happen next but they cannot be certain * correlation doesn't mean causation * Hume argued that what we identify as cause and effect are simply correlations
30
Strengths of Aquinas' third way (Necessity and Contingency)
* it is possible to concieve of things which do not actually exist * Aquinas is attempting to answer why there is a universe not just how * it is logial to suggest there must be at least one first and necessary thing
31
Weaknesses of Aquinas' third way (Necessity and Contingency)
* it would be difficult to conceive of some things not existing * does not explain why God is necessary * why does the necessary being have to be God? * how did the necessary thing come into existence?