Objection 1 - Reserving Flashcards

1
Q

Additional Considerations in Establishing Claim Reserves

A

(In Addition to ASOP #5)

D - incurral Dating Method
R - Reserve Basis - Statutory, GAAP, and Tax bases differ in their use of margin, interest rates, etc
I - Interest - Reserve for claims with long payouts may be discounted to reflect interest
C - Controls and reconciliation - the data used should be tested for accuracy
I - Insurance Characteristics - reserves vary depending on the type of risk covered
R - Reserve Cells - set up separate cells for each homogenous category of business
M - Managed Care Features - Such as discounts and provider risk sharing arrangements
T - Trends
A - Claim Administrative Expenses - Set up a reserve equal to a percentage of the claim reserve
M - Morbidity Assumptions - For long-term Claims, Morbidity is reflected in continuance tables
C - Use of the Case Reserves Method - very labor intensive, so only recommended for small blocks

CRM (Case Reserves Method) - TIMID CAR (small “Block”)

Skwire Chapters 37-38, Pages 645 and 669

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Advantages and Disadvantages of Stochastic Approaches for Reserving

A

Advantages

  1. Provides explicit guidance for establishing provision for adverse deviation in the reserves
  2. Provides guidance on potential variability in reported earnings and reserve levels
  3. Allows for quantification of variability in items such as seasonality and claim trend
  4. Allows for improved evaluation of reserve estimates (by knowing the variability of the estimate)

Disadvantages

  1. Some audiences that are unfamiliar with this approach may have a false sense of confidence in the approach because of its sophistication
  2. May be too complex to be used by all individuals who must perform related functions (like forecasting and pricing)
  3. Not every process can be modeled rigorously

Skwire Chapter 37, Page 654

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Stochastic Modeling Techniques for Reserving

A
  1. Fitting a parametric distribution to the data - this technique works best when the process being modeled is stationary over time
  2. Ordinary least squares regression - this allows for investigation of the effects of specific explanatory variables, such as trend or seasonality
  3. Generalized linear models - these models improve upon ordinary regression models because they allow for cases where the dependent variable being modeled is either bounded (e.g., must be greater than zero) or not normally distributed
  4. Stochastic time series models - these are useful for handling situations where values are correlated across time (e.g., seasonal or cyclical patterns)
  5. Monte Carlo simulation - this approach is of significant practical value when combining results from any of the other techniques

Skwire Chapter 37, Page 656

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Considerations when Developing a Stochastic Approach to Reserve Estimation

A
  1. Availability of data - historical data is needed to validate the model and assumptions
  2. Appropriateness of data - consider whether the processes reflected in the historical data are representative of the process being modeled going forward
  3. Access to statistical software - lack of access to or understanding of modeling software will limit the available choices for modeling techniques
  4. Appropriateness of the model - this can be validated through goodness-of-fit testing, residual analysis, and hold-out sample evaluation
  5. Covariances of modeling estimates -w hen reserve estimates are calculated through component estimates, the covariance between these components must be estimated

Skwire Chapter 37, Page 657

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Features (or aspects) of LTD and LTC contracts to consider when setting reserves

A
  1. Periodic benefits - benefits typically equal some specified monthly or daily amount
  2. Long-term benefit periods - these plans have maximum benefit periods that are much longer than benefit periods for other health benefits
  3. Elimination periods - LTD and LTC plans have a variety of elimination periods (often 90 days or more)
  4. Optional Benefits - these may affect the timing or amount of monthly payments (e.g., partial disability benefits and cost of living adjustments)
  5. Integration of benefits - these plans often coordinate benefits with Social Security and Medicare
  6. Limitations and Exclusions - some claims are excluded (such as intentionally self-inflected injuries) or subject to limited periods (such as mental and nervous claims)

Skwire Chapter 38, Page 661

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Types of long-term claims and reserves methods

A
  1. Open Claims - Claims currently being paid (uses tabular reserves)
    a) Reserve = V(n) = Sum(t=n to BP) [Benefit(t) * Continuance(t) * InterestDiscount(t)]
    i) Benefit = monthly benefit (may vary over time due to product provisions)
    ii) Continuance = probability of a claim continuing to receive payments in the future
    iii) Interest Discount = Factor to reflect time value of money
    iv) Summation runs from current time period (n) to end of benefit period (BP)
  2. Pending Claims - claims that have been reported but payments have not yet begun
    a) Reserve for claims that are still in the elimination period = pending factor * tabular reserve
    b) Reserve for claims that have completed the elimination period = pending factor * (tabular reserve + accumulated value of past payments not yet made)
  3. IBNR claims - claims that have been incurred but have not been reported to the company (Separate list for reserve methods)

Skwire Chapter 38, Page 662

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Methods for Calculating IBNR reserves for Long-Term Claims

A
  1. Percentage of premium method (Special case of the factor Method)
    a) For a historical year in which all claims have been reported, list all claims incurred prior to yearend that were reported after yearend. These are the IBNR claims
    b) Calculate a tabular reserve for each of these claims as of yearend of the historical year
    c) Sum these tabular reserves to get the IBNR reserve for the historical year
    d) Divide this reserve by earned premium for the historical year to get an IBNR reserve factor
    e) Multiply the IBNR reserve factor by earned premium from the current year to produce the IBNR reserve for the current year
  2. Lag Method - this is a simple case of the development method from GHFV-103-16
  3. Loss Ratio Method - Described in list from GHFV-103-16
  4. Combination Methods - for example, use the lag method for earlier incurral months and the loss ration method for recent incurral months where the completion factors are low

Skwire Chapter 38, Page 666

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Common Data Integrity Errors Related to Claim Reserving

A
  1. Missing (D)ata
  2. Misstated age/(G)ender
  3. Inaccurate (E)limination periods or benefit periods
  4. Incomplete or inaccurate information on benefit (I)ntegration
  5. Inaccurate or inconsistent determination of the (I)ncurral date
  6. Inaccurate information on (C)ause of disability
  7. Incorrect (C)oding of claim status (open, closed, or pending)

DIG ICE C (DIG for good data, but you are ICE Cold)

Skwire Chapter 38, Page 673

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Methods for Evaluating Claim Reserve Adequacy

A
  1. Runoff Studies (commonly done by incurral year) - pervious reserve balances are compared to subsequent claim payments and reserve balances, with adjustments for interest
  2. Actual-to-Expected Claim Termination Rate Studies (Commonly done by claim duration) - compares the actual claim termination rates to the expected claim terminations based on the table used for reserving. (See separate list for considerations when preparing this study)
  3. Experience studies - Typically involves a gross premium valuation (GPV) . The reserve is adequate if PV of future gross premiums + reserve > PV of future claim costs and expenses

Note - Point 3 from GHFV-103-16. Point 2 is a specific type of experience study (Point 3).

Skwire Chapter 38, Page 673

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Considerations When Preparing a Claim Termination Rate Study

A
  1. (C)redibility - Sufficient data is needed before conclusions can be drawn from the study
  2. Types of (T)erminations Included - only terminations due to recovery and death should be included (Terminations due to benefit limitations should not be counted)
  3. (E)xposure characteristics - if there is a disproportionate amount of one type of claim, adjustments may be needed
  4. Voluntary claim (S)ettlements - claims that are voluntarily settled are commonly excluded when performing this study

CTES - Claim Termination Experience Study!

Skwire Chapter 38, Page 674

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Types of Reserves and Liabilities (Leida, High Level)

A
  1. Premium Reserves (Separate List)
  2. Policy Reserves (Type of Premium Reserve)
  3. Claim Reserves (Separate list GHFV-103-16)
  4. Premium Deficiency Reserves
  5. Expense Reserves - To cover admin expenses
  6. Reserves related to government plans. Examples: Refund reserves for Medicare Supplement, risk-sharing reserves for Medicare Part D, and special reserves for state Medicaid Programs
  7. Reserves related to ACA-compliant plans, for risk adjustment, reinsurance, risk-corridors, MLR rebates, and reconciliations of various government subsidies
  8. Reserves for contracts with providers, such as for withholds, bonuses, or other risk-sharing mechanisms
  9. Reserves for Experience Rating Refunds (Skwire, Ch. 27)

Leida Chapter 6, Pages 214 and 256

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Definitions of Reserves and Liabilities (Leida)

A
  1. Liabilities are Obligations that are already incurred and accrued (such as the ongoing monthly payment of a known disability income claim)
  2. Reserves are for obligations which have not yet been incurred or are not yet accrued
  3. In practice (and in study notes in syllabus) reserves and liabilities are both referred to as “reserves.” Most reserve calculations focus almost entirely on calculating the combined value of the two.

Leida Chapter 6, Page 214

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Reserve Standards for the Different Types of Financial Statements (Leida)

A
  1. Statutory Statement - Focus is on ensuring solvency, so reserves tend to be conservative
  2. GAAP Statement - Focus is on matching profit streams with revenue streams, with a lesser degree of conservatism (through provisions for adverse deviation)
  3. Tax Statement - IRS standards make sure profits beyond a set level are recognized, and therefore taxed, immediately
  4. Embedded-Value Based Statement - May be needed for international companies. Standards are set by the IASB.

Leida Chapter 6, Page 216

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Types of Premium Reserves (Leida)

A
  1. Types of Active Life Reserves
    a) Unearned Premium Reserve (UPR) - Reserve for the premium that has been booked to cover the portion of the coverage period which hasn’t yet occurred.
    i) Is usually a pro-rata portion of the last gross premium received (gross UPR)
    ii) But when company holds policy reserves, the gross UPR is replaced by a net UPR that is based on the net premium used in calculating policy reserves
    b) Policy Reserves (Contract Reserves) - This is the portion of premium collected in early durations that is intentionally designed to help pay for anticipated higher claims in later durations. Is needed for products where the claim costs increase with age while the premium is level.
  2. Premium Paid in Advance - reserve for premiums paid in advance for future coverage periods
  3. Premium Due and Unpaid - an asset is created on the statement for the amount of premium that is expected to be received

(Some of this is from study note GHFV-103-16)

Leida Chapter 6, Page 217

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Formulas for Policy Reserves

A

Read Card

  1. Prospective Formula on a per Original Policy Basis:
    z,tVx = PV {Future Claims} - PV {Future net Premiums}
    z,tVx = Σi=t+1 to ω {ipx * v^(i-t) * z,iCx} - Σi=1 to ω {ipx * v^(i-t) * z,iPx}
  2. Prospective Formula on a Surviving Policy Basis:
    replace i with ipx with i-t,p,x+t

More on the Card

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Formula for Deferred Acquisition Cost (DAC) Reserves (Leida)

A
  1. DAC = AV {deferrable Expense} - AV {Net expense premiums)
  2. Notation:
    z,iEx = Deferrable expenses at age x, duration i, issue year z
    z,iPx,E = net expense premium at age x, duration i, issue year z
  3. Formula on a per surviving policy basis:
    z,tDACx,s = Σi=0 to t-1 { [ 1 / t-i,p,x+i ] * v^(i-t) * [z,iEx - z,iPx,E ] }

Leida Chapter 6, Page 229

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Types of Policies for Which Policy Reserves are Required (Leida)

A
  1. Contracts that use level premiums
  2. Contracts where the value of the future benefits at any time exceeds the value of future net premiums

Leida Chapter 6, Page 235

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Reasons Why Past Claims Patterns may not be Representative of Future Patterns (Leida)

A

(These would affect validity of using the development method for calculating reserves)

  1. Company starts using electronic submission of claims
  2. Change in work flow due to a change in claim administrative systems
  3. Slow-downs or speed-ups in the claim administration department
  4. Changes in Benefits
  5. Changes in the Level of Claim Backlog

Leida Chapter 6, Page 245

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Reasons why a deficiency reserve may be needed (Leida)

A
  1. A policy is noncancelable, so premium rates cannot be raised
  2. Regulators are unlikely to allow the premium rates to rise to self-sufficient levels
  3. Size of increases needed might trigger an antiselection spiral that makes it impossible to ever break even

Leida Chapter 6, Page 253

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Governing Documents for Setting of Reserves (Leida)

A

(Referred to as “guidelines and standards of practice for calculating long-term claim reserves” in Skwire ch. 38. Combined List)

  1. U.S. Statutory Governing Documents
    a) NAIC Accounting Practices and Procedures Manual
    b) NAIC Model Laws: Standard Valuation Law, Actuarial Opinion and Memorandum Regulation, and Health Insurance Reserves Model Regulation
    c) NAIC Health Reserves Guidance Manual
  2. Canadian Governing Documents
    a) International Financial Reporting Standards for annual statements
    b) Publications and papers from the Canadian Office of the Superintendent of Financial Insurance and the Canadian Institute of Actuaries
  3. US GAAP Governing Documents
    a) Financial Accounting Standards Board: Statements and Interpretations, and Technical Bulletins
    b) Accounting Principles Board Opinions, Statements, and interpretations
    c) American Institute of Certified Public Accountants: Statements of Opinion, and Industry Audit and Accounting Guides
  4. Tax Governing Documents
    a) In the US: IRS Code
    b) In Canada: Canadian Income Tax Act, which requires some adjustments to be made to statutory numbers
  5. Actuarial Governing Documents
    a) Various ASOPs, including 5, 7, 10, 11, 12, 18, 21, 22, 23, 28, 41, and 42
    b) American Academy of Actuaries’ series of Practice Notes
    c) Guides to the Professional Conduct of the American Academy of Actuaries
    d) Literature published in textbooks and by the actuarial profession

Leida Chapter 6, Page 258

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Duties of the Actuary Regarding Quality of Data

A

(From ASOP #23)

  1. Seek out and use (A)ppropriate data and communicate any imperfections
  2. Review data for (R)easonableness and consistency (not necessarily an audit)
  3. Disclose (R)eliance upon others for a review, reconciliation, or audit of the data
  4. Disclose situations where it is impossible or (I)mpractical to perform a sufficient review of the data
  5. Consider whether the use of inappropriate data might create a material (B)ias in the work product
  6. Maintain adequate (D)ocumentation to support the use of specific data
  7. Address reconciliation of paid claims to check registers or general (L)edgers

DIRections BAR Lying (DIR BAR L)

GHFV-103-16 Page 12

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Types of Reserve Reporting

A
  1. Regulatory Reporting - Concerned with solvency and policyholder protection, so conservative
  2. GAAP Reporting - emphasis on realistic earnings. Assumptions include provision for adverse deviation (PfAD)
  3. Experience Reporting for Employers and Providers - typically less sophisticated except for financial settlement and pricing review. For settlements, allow a 3-month run-out period to minimize the size of the estimated reserve.
  4. Valuations for Acquisitions - reserves are material to profitability, so they are often a focal point of negotiations. There is often a final settlement after several months to revisit the purchase price and asses the impact of claim reserves.

GHFV-103-16 Page 16

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Types of Claim Liabilities and Reserves

A
  1. (D)ue and Unpaid Liabilities - Liabilities that have been reported, adjudicated, and processed, but no paid. Is usually small. Itemize or base on historical averages.
  2. (I)n Course of Settlement (ICOS) - Liabilities for claims reporting and received but not yet adjudicated and paid. System may record receipt and run report. Otherwise, use simple method such as average claim times number of claims.
  3. (I)BNR - liabilities for claims that are anticipated but have not been reported. Project by using existing payment data to develop average expected claims payment patterns.
  4. (L)oss Adjustment Expenses - Liabilities for administrative costs of adjudicating unpaid claims. Usually a percentage of unpaid claims liability.
  5. Present value of amounts not yet due (“(U)naccrued in Skwire 37) - An estimate of future amounts due on known open claims
  6. (R)esisted Claims - includes claims for which a known litigation situation exists. Usually reserved seriatim assuming full benefits and possibly amounts for damages.
  7. Outstanding accounting (F)eed (may overlap with due and unpaid liability) - amounts which have been acknowledged as payments, but for which no check has been cut. Reserves are often based on accounts payable and billing notices.
  8. (D)iffered Maternity or other Extended Benefits - the loss is triggered before the valuation date, but benefits are deferred contractual provisions
  9. Other (S)pecial Reserves - Such as for waiver of premium (WoP) due to disability

U FIDDL SIR (yoU FIDDLe SIR! - with reserves of course)

GHFV-103-16, Page 19 (#8 and #9 from Skwire Chapter 37)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Methods of Estimation for Claims Reserves

A

Some methods have different names in other sources, so this list includes multiple names for those methods

  1. Case Reserves - Direct Enumeration on claim-by-claim basis. Typically used only when there are very few claims. Can’t use for IBNR.
    a) Examiner’s Method - Estimate ultimate payment and deduct what’s already been paid
    b) Average Size Claim Method - the number of reported claims times an average claim amount minus the amount already paid
  2. Projection Method - Develop a historical incurred claim rate as a function of some measure of exposure. Then apply this rate to projected exposure to get current incurred claims, and subtract claims already paid. The most common approach is:
    a) Projected PMPM Claim Costs * MbrMnths - Claims Already Paid
  3. Loss Ratio Method (aka Claim Cost Method) - This Method and the Projected Method can be used when the volume of data is small or to validate other methods.
    a) Loss Ratio * Earned Premium - Claims already Paid
  4. Tabular Method - Apply a factor to open claims to calculate reserve. Typically used for LTC or disability. Can’t use for IBNR.
  5. Development Method (aka lag, completion, or triangulation method) - projects historical claim lag pattern into the future to estimate the reserve based on experience data
  6. Factor Method (aka formula method) - historical studies are done of reserves paid after the valuation date for claims incurred before that date. These past reserves are stated as a percentage of some unit of exposure in the past time period (such as annual premium in force) to develop a factor. Current reserves equal to factor multiplied by the current amount of exposure.
  7. Stochastic Approaches - methods where a probabilistic statement can be made about the level and adequacy of the reserve amount. Any of the methods discussed previously can be given a stochastic treatment.

GHFV-103-16, Page 22 (#6 and #7 from Skwire Ch. 37)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Types of Coverages for Which the Development Method Works Well

A
  1. Ability to record incurral and payment (D)ates for each claim
  2. Fairly consistent (L)ag patterns
  3. (S)hort incurral periods relative to the ultimate run out (monthly is preferred for medical)
  4. A sufficient (V)olume of business in each cell, in order to obtain reasonably stable results
  5. Availability of either (E)arned premium or exposure data (For volume adjustments and smoothing)

got all that? dev method is ‘SoLVED’

GHFV-103-16, Page 26

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Steps of the Development Method

A
  1. Summarize the data by incurral month vs Paid month to get a claims triangle
  2. Sum the cells of the first claims triangle to get cumulative paid claims by incurral month
  3. Calculate age-to-age development factors as the ratios of month to month cumulative claims
  4. Smooth the month-to-month variations in age-to-age development factors. Various methods are used to do this (Separate list)
  5. Calculate age-to-ultimate development factors (called completion factors) from the smoothed age-to-age factors
  6. Divide each incurral month’s cumulative paid claims by its completion factor to get fully incurred claims
  7. Subtract cumulative paid claims from the fully incurred claims to get the unpaid claims liability

GHFV-103-16, Page 27

27
Q

Smoothing Methods to Apply to Development Factors

A
  1. Simple Averaging - Average development factors for each lag month (3 month average is more current; 12 month average is smoother but may bury trends in payment patterns)
  2. Removing Bumps - Throw out the high and low factors and average the rest . May also remove large “shock” claims from the claim triangle and analyze them separately.
  3. Weighted Averaging - give more credibility to most recent results. Approaches include sum of digits, squared sum of digits, and constant declining percentage.
  4. Other types of means - Harmonic (use the reciprocal of the “mean of reciprocals”) or Geometric (the nth root of the “product of n observations”)
  5. Dollar-weighted methods (prior methods have been ratio weighted) - average cumulative payments for consecutive lag months and then compute age-to-age factors as the ratio of those averages
  6. Per member age-to-age ratios j- divide payments per lag by exposure to create PMPM payments, and then apply the dollar-weighted approach as before

GHFV-103-16, Page 32

28
Q

Methods for Adjusting Development Method Reserve Estimates for Recent Incurral Months

A

Completion Factors for the most recent months are typically too small to be credible and should be replaced using one of the following methods:

  1. Loss Ratio Method
  2. Projection Method
  3. Credibility-Weighted Average of completion estimates with estimates based on the projection or loss ratio method. Weights are usually assigned based on how close the completion factor is to 1.0, with the most recent month often receiving zero completion credibility.

GHFV-103-16, Page 36

29
Q

Process for Building in Conservatism in Claim Reserves

A
  1. Development Method - can incorporate conservatism in the completion and projection factors. But usually use most likely factors and add an explicit margin to the reserve
  2. Tabular Reserves - Margins are typically included in the assumptions made to calculate the tabular factors
  3. Projection method -add margins to the trend assumptions that are used to project costs per unit
  4. Loss Ratio Method - margins can be explicit or implicit, depending on the choice of loss ratio

GHFV-103-16, Page 44

30
Q

Assumptions Needed to Estimate Premium Deficiency Reserves

A

PDR = PV of future claim costs and expenses less PV of Future premiums and current reserves (all types of reserves: contract, claim, and premium)

(Use assumptions that are realistic rather than conservative)

  1. (R)ate Increases - Must be reasonable and likely to be implemented and approved
  2. (E)nrollment - cannot project that new entrants will improve morbidity unless there is historical experience to justify this assumption
  3. (L)apses - should reflect any potential antiselection, particularly if induced by rating actions
  4. (E)xpenses - operating costs must be reflected. If other policies can be expected to cover overhead, then zero overhead costs may be assumed.

5 Claims (T)rend - reflect reasonable increases in claim costs

  1. (I)nterest Rates - Reasonable interest rate assumptions should be used to discount deficiencies
  2. (T)axes - reserves should be calculated on an after-tax basis
  3. (P)rovider Arrangements
    a) Provider settlements under risk sharing arrangements should not be used to offset claims unless they have been specifically determined and billed to the providers
    b) Include capitations as claim costs at the level currently negotiated. Recognize that if the provider goes insolvent, the discounts are lost and costs will rise.
  4. (R)einsurance - the calculation of the reserve is usually net of reinsurance

deficiency? send feds a RIPE LETTR

GHFV-103-16, Page 53 (Last point from PDR Discussion Paper)

31
Q

Types of Outcome-Based Contractual Reserves

A
  1. Employer-Based (C)ontractual Liabilities - Need to recognize liabilities for contracts where the employer shares the risk of emerging claims experience. The most common is the contractual claims stabilization reserve (CSR) = Prior Period CSR + Premiums Earned + Interest Credits - Claims Incurred - Risk and Retention Charge.
  2. (A)ccruals for refunds needed to achieve minimum loss ratios, such as the ACA medical loss ratio requirement
  3. (P)rovider liabilities - for example, capitation payments owed, bonuses and incentives, stop loss settlements, and anticipated insolvency of capitated providers.

CAP (as in capitation, a provider liabilities that might be owed)

GHFV-103-16, Page 55

32
Q

Steps for Using the Authorization Method to Project Claims

A
  1. Gather data on the number of authorized services as of the valuation date
  2. Adjust Authorized Services - adjust for differences between initial authorizations and actual services rendered. Differences arise due to appeals, poor data, and issues with coordination of benefits and enforceability of rules.
  3. Calculate an average cost per service rendered - this average cost is frequently a blend of provider contractual amounts and actual payments made
  4. Estimate incurred claims - multiply the number of services by the cost per service
  5. Calculate the estimated IBNR - equals the estimated incurred claims minus the amount of paid claims to date

GHFV-103-16, Page 63

33
Q

Methods for Calculating Provider Liabilities

A
  1. Risk-based payments - liabilities are based on projected contractual pay out, which is commonly based on the difference between experienced an targeted costs. Settlements are often done several months after the period ends, so reserves play a minimal role. Reserves should consider any applicable stop-loss or carve-out provisions.
  2. Bonus or incentive contracts - estimates are normally based on utilization studies

GHFV-103-16, Page 66

34
Q

Alternative Approaches for Estimating Liabilities with the Development Method

A
  1. Multiple Triangles - This technique looks at claim triangles in both the traditional way (claims paid by service date) and in a new way (claims reported by service date)
  2. Other kinds of lag triangles - some actuaries bucket payments into weekly cells and then apply the traditional development method
  3. Time series and other statistical Projections (referred to as “regression methods” in Leida chapter 6) - these techniques used advanced statistical and computer tools to help in projecting claims. Uses included:
    a) Project payment patterns for partially complete incurral months (using statistical or time series techniques - instead of development factors - to complete the claims)
    b) Project PMPM costs that can be applied in projection method techniques

GHFV-103-16, Page 70

35
Q

Challenges in Valuations for Group Life and Health Business (CIA Educational Note)

A
  1. Group Insurance Encompasses different lines of business with different features
  2. There is a wide variety of benefits and financial arrangements
  3. For groups beyond a certain size, contacts are usually customized and contain side agreements
  4. Record keeping and administrators do not always meet the actuary’s needs
  5. Statutory experience refund reserves may not equal the group’s surplus due to a difference in valuation bases
  6. There is a wide variety of benefit types, contract provisions, and rating practices
  7. Group contracts are traditionally short term, but some liabilities may be long term
  8. There are often data issues

CIA Ed Note: Valuation of Group Life and Health Policy Liabilities, Page 14

36
Q

Considerations in Assessing trends in disability termination rates (CIA Educational Note)

A
  1. Changes in the mix of disabilities by cause, by severity, or by geographical region
  2. Changes in the level of benefits provided
  3. Changes in claim administration practices
  4. Economic Cycles
  5. Material change in inflation or benefit indexation
  6. Changes in government plan definition of disability (this will impact benefit offsets)

What’s changing?

Mix/BenefitLvl/ClmAdmin/Economy/Inflation/GovtDefofDisability

CIA Ed Note: Valuation of Group Life and Health Policy Liabilities, Page 20

37
Q

Experience Rating Formula used to determine accrued experience rated refund (ERR) Liabilities

A
1. Accrued ERR Liability = 
Policyholder (PH) valuation claims 
- Claims 
\+ Interest Credited 
- Interest required on existing PH Liabilities 
\+ PH Valuation Expenses 
- Claim Admin Charges 
\+ Premium 
- Expense Premium 
- Profit Charges
- PH Liabilities on New Claims 
\+ Increase in Deficits 
- Risk Charges
2. Watch the signs carefully. A deficit is a negative surplus.

CIA Ed Note: Valuation of Group Life and Health Policy Liabilities, Page 54

38
Q

Formula for Future ERR Liabilities

A
  1. To the extent the claim cash flows assumed in the policyholder basis exceed the GAAP basis, it creates future ERR cash flow
  2. PV(ERRs) =
    PH Margin on Existing Claim Liabilities
    + PH Margin on New Claim Liabilities
    + PV (Int Credited - Int Req on Existing PH Liabilities)
    + PV (PH Valuation Expense - Claims Admin Charges)
    + Premium
    - Expense Premium
    - Profit Charges
    - Liabilities on New Claims
    a) Where: PH Margin on Existing Claim Liabilities =
    PV (PH Valuation Claims - GAAP Valuation Claims)
    b) A similar situation will exist for the PH Margin on new claim liabilities

CIA Ed Note: Valuation of Group Life and Health Policy Liabilities, Page 54

39
Q

Principles for Determining Premium Deficiency Reserves

A

According to the AAA PDR Work Group:

  1. Situations that result in a PDR being established include:
    a) Block of business expected to have near-term losses
    b) Block of business expected to be profitable in the near term, but long-term guarantees will cause it to be unprofitable over the projection period
  2. Should minimize false positives - no PDR should be required unless there is a meaningful potential for loss
  3. Should minimize false negatives - a PDR should be required when there is an expectation for loss

Premium Deficiency Reserves Discussion Paper, Page 7

40
Q

Contract Groupings for PDR Calculations

A
  1. Process of grouping contracts consists of two levels;
    a) Testing level is the minimum level at which financial projections are performed. The focus is on how to group contracts so that projections will provide meaningful and credible results
    b) The reporting level is based on how management combines the testing level results for external reporting purposes. Contracts should be grouped ina manner consistent with how policies are marketed, serviced, and measured.
  2. Deficiencies on a product can be offset by profits on other products within its group, but not by profits in other contract groupings
  3. The recommended groupings from the Health Reserves Guidance Manual are:
    a) Comprehensive Major Medical
    b) LTC
    c) Income Protection (disability income)
    d) Limited Benefits Plan

Premium Deficiency Reserves Discussion Paper, 18

41
Q

Factors that Affect how contracts are grouped at the testing level for Determining a PDR

A
  1. (M)ateriality of a group relative to size of the whole reporting entity
  2. Similarity of (P)roduct types
  3. Differences in (M)arketing methods
  4. Potential (R)ate restrictions
  5. (G)eographical rating areas
  6. (L)ength of rate guarantee periods
  7. (R)egulatory Requirements
  8. (L)ine of business (Individual vs Group)
  9. (C)ase Size within group business
  10. Expected (F)uture growth or decline of a possible grouping

GRP FRM CLM L (GRouP FRoM CLaiM “Largeness”)

Premium Deficiency Reserves Discussion Paper, page 19

42
Q

Statements the Actuary must make in the Statement of Actuarial Opinion for Health Annual Statement

A
  1. The Liabilities are in accordance with Accepted Actuarial Standards
  2. The Liabilities are based on appropriate actuarial assumptions
  3. The Liabilities meet the requirements of the laws of the state of domicile
  4. The Liabilities make good and sufficient provision for all unpaid claims and other actuarial liabilities
  5. Liabilities are computed based on assumptions that are consistent with the prior year’s assumptions
  6. Liabilities include appropriate provision for all actuarial items that ought to be established

Read/Think/Right - SoAO for Health Annual Statement, Page 14

43
Q

Approaches for Signing the Statement of Actuarial Opinion when Reserves are Too Low or Too High

A
  1. Issue a qualified opinion - be straightforward in laying out the concerns, and then state the actuarial opinion with those exceptions noted
  2. Convince management to changes the reserves to an appropriate level
  3. If other options fail, notify management that you must sign an opinion stating that reserves are inadequate - this decision cannot be taken lightly, since you will probably lose your job as a result.

Read/Think/Right - SoAO for Health Annual Statement,, Page 16

44
Q

Uses of Health insurance Financial Models

A

Pricing - Financial and Sales models are used to determine premiums

Reserve calculations and reserve basis evaluation - some reserves (such as GPR) are calculated by forecasting models

Monitoring of results - To validate assumptions, to warn of deviations from expected values, and for resource planning

Solvency Testing - May indicate a need for gross premium reserves

Financial forecasting - Corporations forecast results for various reasons

Actuarial appraisals - these are studies of the value of a block of business, typically used when transferring ownership

Leida Chapter 8, Page 293

45
Q

Essential Characteristics of a Good Model

A

Reliable (A)ccuracy - A model must be good at predicting the future. It must also be robust.

(S)uitability for Use - the model should produce the results it is designed for, without adding unnecessary complications

Appropriate (P)recision - this relates to how many decimal places should be kept in the values

(S)ensibility - the model should reflect a logical construction of what is being modeled. It should also be theoretically sound

Effectively (C)ommunicated - This includes communicating everything necessary to understand and use the model’s results

Accurate SPeCS (A SPCS)

Leida Chapter 8, Page 297

46
Q

Steps in Building A Forecast Model

A
  1. Choosing the Basic Structure of the Model
    a) Tools used include spreadsheets, database models, and sequential programs
    b) Model types include asset share models, reserve development models, and agent-based models
  2. Choosing the information to be carried - the information needed will depend on the purpose of the model
  3. Choosing Assumptions and Building a Prototype Projection
    a) Starting Values and Assumptions must be built into the model
    b) A prototype cell is defined, and then projected to the end of the forecast period
  4. Extending the Prototype - After the prototype cell is built, the model must be extended to other cells which represent the different subsets of the business being modeled
  5. Validating the model (separate list)
  6. Documenting the Model - This allows the model to be evaluated by other professionals, and makes it easier to make modifications
  7. Designing Output and Communicating Results - The model output can be useless unless it is put into the context of the question being asked

Leida Chapter 8, Page 298

47
Q

Methods for Validating Forecast Models

A
  1. Starting Values are compared (D)irectly to the Actual values for that Year
  2. Year to Year (C)hanges in the model are compared to the actual past historical results
  3. Model results are checked for reasonableness by people (F)amiliar with the business
  4. (S)tress Testing - Analyze how the modeled results behave when some of the underlying assumptions are changed (includes sensitivity testing)

D F C S (Didn’t Fucking Check Shit)

Leida Chapter 8, Page 310

48
Q

Assumptions Needed for Forecasting

A
  1. Lapse Assumptions - Lapse Rates Vary widely by product, duration, company, and member or policy
  2. Mortality - Some models treat mortality as a separate decrement, but most models combine mortality and lapses (because mortality is a minor assumptions for health insurance)
  3. Claim Costs - it is best to use actual experience when possible. Trend assumptions are needed for determining future claim costs
  4. Expense Assumptions - expenses are usually expressed on a per unit basis (such as per policy or a % of prem / claims)
  5. Profit Assumptions - Profits can be measured as an ROI, an ROE, or a percentage of premium
  6. Model office assumptions - these assumptions define the proportion of the block of business that is represented by each model cell

Leida Chapter 8, Page 313

49
Q

ASOP Considerations for Estimating Incurred Claims (ASOP #5)

A
  1. (H)ealth Benefit Plan provisions and business practices - reflect provisions and practices that materially affect the cost, frequency, or severity of claims
  2. (E)conomic and other external influences - such as unemployment levels, cost shifting, and catastrophic events
  3. (B)ehavior of claimants - consider pent-up demand for new Benefits
  4. Organizational claims (A)dministration - considerations, including staffing levels, computer system changes, or seasonal backlogs
  5. Claim (S)easonality - Adjustments should be made for the impact of seasonality on claims
  6. (C)redibility - consider how the credibility of the data affects the incurred claim
  7. (R)isk Characteristics and Organizational Practices by Block of Business - consider the effects of marketing and underwriting on the types of risks accepted
  8. (L)egislative requirements - consider how regulations can affect incurred claims, such as by mandating benefits or influencing rating, reserving, and underwriting practices
  9. (C)arve Outs - consider the effect of carved-out benefits on incurred claim levels
  10. (S)pecial considerations for long-term products - such as cost of living adjustments, inflation protection, and integration with social insurance

HBC SCALERS (Health Benefit Claim SCALERS)

ASOP #5, Page 4

50
Q

ASOP Procedures for Analyzing Incurred Claims (ASOP #5)

A
  1. Unpaid Claims Liability - Use Incurral and processing dates to estimate the liability for claims incurred as fo the valuation date. In doing this, consider:
    a) The intended purpose or use of the estimate
    b) Plan provisions
    c) The claim dating method used
    d) Provision for Adverse Deviation
    e) Time Value of Money
    f) The assumptions and methodology used - these should be typically consistent with those used for estimating related liabilities
  2. Categories of incurred claims - consider separate estimation of claims for each category exhibiting different lag petterns, costs, or trends
  3. Reinsurance Arrangements - consider their effect on estimated claims
  4. Large Claims - Consider the effect of large claims, which includes distortions in payment patterns
  5. Coordination of benefits, subrogation, and government programs - understand these items and how they are reflected in the data
  6. Provider Contractual Arrangements - Consider how these affect trends, claim cost levels, and claims processing, and consider any changes in these arrangements

ASOP #5, Page 5

51
Q

Items to Include in an Actuarial Communication subject to ASOP #5

A
  1. Important (D)ates used in the analysis, such as the incurral, processing, and valuation dates
  2. Significant (L)imitations that constrained the actuary’s analysis
  3. Specific significant risks and (U)ncertainties that could cause actual results to vary from the incurred claim estimate
  4. Any explicit (P)rovision for adverse deviation
  5. The risk that provider (I)nsolvency may have a material effect on the liability
  6. Any follow-up (S)tudies the actuary may have utilized in developing the incurred claim estimate
  7. When updating a previous estimate, (C)hanges in assumptions, procedures, methods, or models that the actuary believes to have a material impact on the incurred claim estimate, as well as the reasons for such changes

U DISCL P (yoU DISCLose Pfad)

ASOP #5, Page 10

52
Q

Purposes of Cash Flow Analysis (ASOP #7)

A
  1. Determination of (R)eserve Adequacy
  2. Determination of (C)apital Solvency
  3. Product Development or (R)atemaking Studies
  4. Evaluations of (I)nvestment strategy
  5. Financial projections or (F)orecasts
  6. Actuarial (A)ppraisals
  7. Testing of future benefits that may vary at the (D)iscretion of the insurer (such as dividend scales)

CAR DRIFt - If your car drifts, you may need some cash flow to fix it

ASOP #7, Page 1

53
Q

When to do cash flow testing (ASOP #7)

A
  1. Situations where cash flow testing is needed:
    a) Where there are (M)aterial asset risks
    b) Where there are liabilities that have cash flows (F)ar out into the future
    c) Where a company has a new or (R)apidly growing line of business
    d) Where policyholder options are likely to result in (A)ntiselection
  2. Situations where cash flow testing is not needed:
    a) Products with (S)hort-term liabilities supported by short-term assets
    b) (B)usiness that is not sensitive to changes in economic conditions or interest rates
    c) If the risk being evaluated is (U)nanticipated sources of significant claims (past examples include AIDS and asbestos)

FARM SUB (farm subsidies are cash flows)

ASOP #7, Page 4

54
Q

Cash Flow Analysis Documentation Required by Actuarial Standards (ASOP #7)

A
  1. Whether any prior analyses were relied on
  2. The purpose of the analysis and the risks analyzed
  3. The type of analysis performed (such as cash flow testing)
  4. The results of the analysis
  5. The actuary’s conclusions and recommendations
  6. Any conclusions or recommendations related to sensitivity testing
  7. The data, assumptions, and methods used

PPT RCS MAD (Made a PowerPoint with recommendations)

ASOP #7, Page 11

55
Q

Methods Used for Asset Adequacy Analysis (ASOP #22)

A
  1. Cash Flow Testing - Is appropriate where cash flows of existing assets and liabilities may vary under different economic or interest-rate scenarios
  2. Gross Premium Reserve Test - May be appropriate where the policy and other liability cash flows are sensitive to moderately adverse deviations in actuarial assumptions
  3. Demonstration of extreme conservatism - when the degree of conservatism in the liabilities is so great that moderately adverse deviations are covered, then a demonstration of this conservatism is sufficient.
  4. Demonstration that risks are not subject to material variation - for products that have risks that are not subject to material variation, it is sufficient to demonstrate this fact and show that moderately adverse deviations are covered
  5. Risk Theory Techniques - for products with short-term liabilities supported by short-term assets, it may be more appropriate to measure moderately adverse deviations using risk theory techniques
  6. Loss Ratio Methods - These may be appropriate when the cash flows are of short duration

ASOP #22, Page 5

56
Q

Considerations when forming an Opinion with Respect to Asset Adequacy (ASOP #22)

A
  1. (R)easonableness of Results
  2. (A)dequacy of reserves and other liabilities under moderately adverse conditions. Reserves do not need to be so great as to withstand any conceivable adverse circumstance
  3. Analysis of (s)cenario results - inadequacy in only a small % of scenarios does not indicate the need for additional reserves
  4. (A)ggregation during testing - separate blocks of business should not be combined for reserve testing if their assets cannot be shared for satisfying the liabilities
  5. Aggregation of (r)esults - results from separate blocks can generally be combined so that deficiencies in one business segment can be offset by sufficiencies in another segment
  6. (T)rends - The actuary should reconcile results from prior years
  7. (M)anagement actions - consider anticipated actions by management to address adequacy concerns
  8. (S)ubsequent events - consider all material subsequent events that are likely to affect the analysis

R AS SMART (aRe ASsets SMART enough to be adequate?)

ASOP #22, Page 7

57
Q

Actuarial Standards for Use of Data (ASOP #23)

A
  1. Data that is completely accurate, appropriate, and comprehensive is frequently not available, so the actuary should use available data that allows the actuary to perform the analysis
  2. Considerations in selecting data (separate list)
  3. Review of Data - The actuary should review the data for reasonableness, unless such a review is not necessary or practical
  4. The actuary should use appropriate data (separate list)
  5. Reliance on data and other information supplied by others - the accuracy of this information is the responsibility of those who supply it. The actuary may rely on this information, but should disclose this reliance.
  6. Confidentiality - the actuary should handle data containing confidential information consistent with Precept 9 of the Code of Professional Conduct
  7. Limitation of the Actuary’s Responsibility - The actuary is not required to audit the data or determine whether data supplied by others is intentionally misleading

ASOP #23, Page k2

58
Q

Considerations in selecting data to use in actuarial analysis (ASOP #23)

A

D - The (D)esired data elements
A - Consdier (A)lternative data elements
A - Whether the data is (A)ppropriate for intended purpose
C - Sufficiently (C)urrent
C - Whether the data is internally/Externally (C)onsistent
R - Whether the data is (R)easonable and comprehensive
L - Any known significant (L)imitations of the data
F - Cost and Feasibility of Alternative data and time required
B - Benefits to be gained from alternative data
S - Sampling methods that were used to collect the data

FR BAD CALCS (FoR preventing BAD CALCS, focus on data -> need good data)

ASOP #23, Page 2

59
Q

Categories of Appropriateness of data used in An Actuarial Analysis (ASOP #23)

A
  1. Data is of acceptable quality to perform the analysis
  2. Data requires enhancements before the analysis can be performed, and it is practical to obtain additional or corrected data
  3. Judgmental adjustments or assumptions can be applied to the data, or the analysis results, to allow the actuary to perform the analysis
  4. Data is likely to have significant defects
  5. Data is so inadequate that it cannot be used to satisfy the purpose of the assignment

ASOP #23, Page 4

60
Q

Required Documentation Related to Data Quality (ASOP #23)

A

S - The (S)ource of the data
L - Any (L)imitations on the sue of the actuarial work product due to uncertainty about data quality
R - Whether the actuary (R)eviewed the data, and any limitations due to data that was not reviewed
C - A summary of unresolved (C)oncerned the actuary may have about questionable data values
A - A summary of significant judgmental (A)djustments or assumptions
U - The existence of results that are highly (U)ncertain or potentially biased due to the quality of the data
R - The extent of the actuary’s (R)eliance on data and other information supplied by others
C - Conflicts with complying with (L)aws and regulations

SUR CALL R (SURe CALL it Reasonable)

ASOP #23, Page 6

61
Q

Disclosures Required in an Actuarial Report (ASOP #41)

A
  1. Intended (U)sers of Report
  2. (S)cope and Intended Purpose of the Assignment
  3. Acknowledgement of (Q)ualification as specified in the Qualification Standards
  4. Any cautions about (R)isk and Uncertainty
  5. Any (L)imitations or constraints on the use or applicability of the findings
  6. Any (C)onflict of interest
  7. Any information on which the actuary (R)elied that has a material impact on the findings and for which the actuary does not assume responsibility
  8. The (I)nformation date (date through which data and other information has been considered)
  9. (S)ubsequent events (may have a material effect on the actuarial findings)
  10. If appropriate, the (D)ocuments comprising the actuarial report

RQ DSCLOSUR (ReQuired DISCLoSURe items)

ASOP #41, Page 7

62
Q

Disclosure Requirements for Assumptions and Methods used in an Actuarial Report (ASOP #41)

A
  1. The communication should identify the party responsible for each material assumption and method
  2. If the assumption or method is prescribed by law, disclose the applicable law, the assumptions or methods affected, and that the report was prepared in accordance with the law
  3. If a material assumption or method is selected by another party, the actuary has 3 choices:
    a) If it does not conflict with the actuary’s professional judgment, no disclosure is needed
    b) If it significantly conflicts with the actuary’s professional judgment, then disclose this fact
    c) If the actuary is unable or not qualified to judge its reasonableness, then disclose this fact

In the case of either b or c, also disclose the affected assumption or method, the party who set it, and the reason it was set by this party, rather than by the actuary.

ASOP #41, Pages 5 and 8

63
Q

Considerations for Determining Contract Reserves (ASOP #42)

A
  1. Interest Rates - rates should be reasonable and consistent with the purpose of the reserve
  2. Morbidity - this assumption should reflect he underlying risk, including factors such as age, gender, durational effects, and adverse selection
  3. Persistency - This assumption should include both involuntary and voluntary terminations
  4. Expenses - consider whether maintenance, acquisition, or claim expenses should be included
  5. Trend - inflation, utilization, morbidity, and expense rates should reflect the appropriate trend
  6. Premium rate changes - assumptions for future rate changes should reflect market conditions, regulatory restrictions, and rate guarantees
  7. Valuation method - when the valuation method is not prescribed, the actuary should choose an appropriate method

ASOP #42, Page 6

64
Q

Considerations for Determining Provider-Related Liabilities (ASOP #42)

A
  1. Risk-sharing and capitation arrangements - the nature of the arrangement should be considered when determining whether to establish a liability
  2. Provider financial condition - consider whether the provider will be able to meet its obligation
  3. Provider incentive payments - If an agreement with a provider calls for incentive payments, consider whether a liability should be held for those payments

ASOP #42, Page 9