Obedience - Social psychology Flashcards

1
Q

What is obedience?

A

A type of social influence whereby someone acts in response to direct order from a perceived figure in authority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is destructive obedience?

A

Destructive obedience is compliance with orders that result in negative consequences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is autonomous and agentic state in the Agency theory?

A

Autonomous state is where we behave independently
Agentic state is where we carry out orders from a person we believe is an authoritative figure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is agentic shift in the Agency theory?

A

The transformation from autonomous state to agentic state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is moral strain?

A

Where people experience symptoms of anxiety when obeying orders to result in harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What supports the Agency theory?

A

The Agency Theory is supported by the 1963 study of obedience. However, Gina Perry said participants questioned the reality of the shocks.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are uses of the Agency theory?

A

It was applied in a variety of military strategies devised to ensure soldiers follow orders without question reducing moral strain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What evidence is against the Agency Theory?

A

Agentic shift isn’t inevitable
This is proven in a separate study with nurses who failed to obey orders of doctors for an overdose of the drug Valium

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the aim of Milgram’s baseline study of obedience?

A

To understand the behaviour of Germans who followed orders to kill 10,000,000 Jews during the Holocaust

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was the procedure for Milgram’s baseline study of obedience?

A

-40 men were recruited, aged 20-50, Americans
-Offered £4.50 for participation
-Students would be asked a question, if they answered wrong the participant would shock the student ; the student answered questions wrong on purpose
-The more questions wrong, the higher the intensity of the shock
-Shock between 15V - 450V
-Verbal prods were used such as “Please continue”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What were the findings of Milgram’s baseline study of obedience?

A

-65% administrated to pull the 450V shock
-100% administrated to pull the 300V shock
-Participants were sweating, trembling and dug their fingernails into their own flesh out of anxiety

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was the evaluation of Milgram’s baseline study of obedience?

A

-Standardised procedure made every participant have the same experience which makes it more reliable and replicable. However, Gina Perry argues sometimes 20 prods were given.
-a weakness is that people may have only obeyed because they didn’t think the shock was real / demand characteristics
-Milgram’s findings are used in pilot training. Tarnow describes how his first officers fail to monitor and challenge errors made by the captain which could prevent 20% of all plane crashes
-The study raised ethical issues ; Perry argued some participants left the lab believing the learner was killed. This is deception.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was the conclusion of Milgram’s baseline study of obedience?

A

-Ordinary Americans are obedient to legitimate authority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was experiment 7 of Milgram’s variational studies?

A

Telephonic instructions
-The experimenter gave orders to the teacher over the telephone. 22.5% of participants were fully obedient.
-Participants found it easier to resist authority in this passive way
-The physical presence of the authority figure is a situational factor that increases obedience

evaluation
-A strength is that subsequent research has replicated this finding. demonstrating external validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was experiment 10 of Milgram’s variational studies?

A

Rundown office block
-The study took place in a rundown office block instead of the prestigious Yale University. 47.5% of participants were obedient.
-This shows setting is a situational factor that affects obedience

evaluation
-A strength is Milgram collected qualitative and quantitative data between participants and experimenter. Modilgilani and Rochat conducted a re-analysis in which the earlier in the procedure the participant challenged the experimenter, the more likely they were to be fully defiant. This allowed Modigilani and Rochat to gain an insight into different types of resistance and used their findings to explain “Ordinariness of goodness”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What was experiment 13 of Milgram’s variational studies?

A

Ordinary man gives orders
-When the person giving the order was wearing ordinary clothes, 80% of participants refused to continue. This is a situational factor of dissent

evaluation
-a weakness is that it lacks internal validity, as the experiment was almost impossible to achieve. This suggests obedience may be lower in situations where the person giving orders is completely unrelated to any authority figure or context

15
Q

What does the social impact theory describe and who founded it?

A
16
Q

What is social force in the social impact theory?

A

Strength - How important the person is to you
Immediacy - How recent it is
Number - How many sources and targets present during the interaction

17
Q

What was the multiplication vs division of impact in the social impact theory?

A

Multiplication effect explains how increasing strength, immediacy and number can increase social impact
Division effect explains how social impact is reduced if strength, immediacy and number is decreased

18
Q

What is the law of diminishing returns in the social impact theory?

A

This means adding an extra person to a group of 52 people will have less impact than adding an extra person to a group of 2 people

19
Q

Evaluation of the social impact theory

A

Strength is that its supported by research evidence of Sedikides and Jackson 1990 conducting an experiment on a zoo, where visitors were asked not to touch railings. It was found if a confederate was dressed in zookeeper uniform, obedience would be high at 58% but when dressed casually obedience is at 35%
-Immediacy was also tested as there was 61% obedience when the zookeeper was in the same room but when in an adjacent room, obedience dropped to 7%
-x vs % impact was also tested as obedience was greater in smaller groups over large groups
-however this was a field experiment so researchers
couldn’t manipulate the number of people in each
group, reducing internal validity

Weakness is that immediacy isn’t important
-Hofling arranged for an unknown doctor to telephone 22 nurses and ask each of them to administer an overdose a drug that wasn’t on the ward list. 95% administered the drug
-this challenges social impact theory because the
source being absent should’ve reduced the effect

Used with political leaders to increase their influence by strong and persuasive style of communication with voters, aiming to reach voters by talking face-to-face and addressing smaller groups rather than crowds