Obedience: Dispositional explanations Flashcards

1
Q

What is the dispositional explanation

A

Authoritarian personality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Who conducted research into authoritarian personality

A

Ardono

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What did ardono initially believe

A

That a high level of obedience was a psychological disorder and tried to locate the causes of it in the personality of the individual

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Who did ardono study

A

More than 2 000 middle class, white Americans and their unconscious attitudes towards other racial groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What did the f-scale measure

A

Tendency towards fascism, one characteristic of authoritarianism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What type of people scored highly on the f-scale

A

Identified with strong people and were contemptuous of the weak. Conscious of their own and others status, showing excessive respect to those of a higher status

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How many authoritarian characteristics were identified by Adorno

A

6

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

6 authoritarian characteristic identified by Adorno

A
  • extreme respect for authority
  • contempt for people theur believe to have inferior
  • highly conventional attitudes towards sex, race and gender
  • enforce traditional values eg country, religion and family
  • inflexible in their outlook, everything is right or wrong
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

5 characteristics of parenting leading to authoritarian personality

A
  • strict discipline
  • exception of absolute royalty
  • impossibly high standards
  • severe criticism and perceived failings
  • conditional love
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

4 evaluation points of authoritarian personality

A

Strength - supportive evidence
Weakness - can’t establish cause and effect
Weakness - limited explanation
Weakness - issues with methodology of f-scale

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Elaboration of strength - supportive evidence

A
  • Elms conducted interviews with a small sample of ps who had been obedient in milgrams study
  • they found higher levels of authoritarianism compared to those who didn’t obey
  • they saw Milgram as more obedient than the leader, which did not happen with those who didn’t obey
  • suggesting those who obeyed in milgrams study were higher than authoritarianism traits
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Elaboration weakness - can’t establish cause and effect

A
  • can’t establish cause and effect with obedience and authoritarianism wirh ardonos research
  • the f scale questionnaire found siffnificant correlation between variables
  • eg authoritarianism is strongly correlated with prejudice against minority groups
  • however, ardono couldn’t claim that authoritarianism is the cause of obedience as you cannot establish cause and effect with correlation
  • this underestimates the validity of the explanation as there could be other factors mediating between obedience and personality
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Elaboration of weakness - limited explanation

A
  • limited explanation as can’t explain obedience in majority of countries population
  • in pre war Germany millions of people demonstrated racist and anti-semantic views despite the fact there were a multiple different personalities
  • extremely unlikely they would all possess the same personality
  • better explain by social identity and an alternative explanation is more realistic
  • the majority of German people would identify wirh rhe anti-Semitic nazi state
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Elaboration of weakness - issues regarding methodology

A
  • green stein describes the f scale as comedy of methodology errors
  • eg scale criticised as they were all written in the same direction meaning you could get a higher score from just ticking the same line of boxes
  • meaning people who agree with the items on the scale are not necessarily authoritarianism
  • it’s measuring people’s tendancy to agree with things
  • this lowers internal validity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly