Obedience Flashcards

1
Q

Who conducted research into obedience?

A

Milgram

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the aim of
Milgram’s obedience study?

A

Are Germans more obedient than Americans?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What was the procedure in the experiment?

A
  • Learner strapped into a chair in another room and wired up with electrodes
  • Teacher required to administer electric shocks each time a learner made a mistake
    (learning word pairs)
  • Real shock demonstrated on teacher (after this, shocks weren’t real)
  • Shocks began at 15 (slight shock)
  • Up to level 30: 450 volts (danger-severe shock)
  • teacher at 300 volts, learner pounded on wall and didnt respond to question
  • At 315 volts, learner pounded on the wall and no further response for the rest of the experiment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was the procedure leading up to the experiment?

A
  • 40 males recruited through newspapers
    > asked for volunteers for a study into memory
  • All aged between 20 and 50
  • Jobs ranged from unskilled to professional
  • Offered $4.50 to take part (decent in 60s) and paid upon arrival
  • A rigged election decided their role
  • Confederate: Mr. Wallace always ended up as the learner and the participant always ended up as the teacher
  • Experimenter present in a lab coat
  • Participants told they can leave at any time
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are participant prods?

A

Words of encouragement used in the obedience study to persuade teachers to continue when they turned to experimenters for guidance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What would the experimenter say as guidance?

A

“An absence of response should be treated as a wrong answer”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the 4 participant prods if teachers are unsure?

A

“Please continue”
“The experiment requires that you continue”
“It is absolute essential that you continue”
“You have no choice, you must go on”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What were the findings of the obedience study?

A

No participant stopped below 300 volts
- 12.5% stopped at 300 volts
- 65% continued to highest level of 450 volts
- Qualitative data (observations) collected revealed participants showed signs of tension
- 3 participants had ‘full blown, uncontrollable seizures’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What were the signs of tension?

A

Sweating, trembling, stuttering, lip biting and groaning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What were the estimated findings before the study?

A
  • 14 psych students predicted no more than 3% would continue to 450 volts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How did Milgram combat ethical issues?

A
  • Right to withdraw
    > Milgram informed them of this before the start of the study
  • Fully informed consent
    > volunteering through newspapers, adverts and flyers as consent for participation
  • The use of deception
    > fully debriefed at the end of the study and justified participants behavior
  • Importance of protecting participants from the risk of psych and physical harm
    > fake shocks used throughout he experiment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What studies strengthened obedience research?

A

Sheridan and King
Hofling et al
Documentary about reality TV in France

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was Sheridan and King’s study?

A

Conducted a similar study with puppies
- Puppies issued real electric shocks
- 54% of male participants delivered what they believe was a fatal shock
- 100% of female participants delivered what they believe was a fatal shock
- Effects of Milgram’s study was genuine

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was Hofling et al’s study?

A

Studied nurses on a ward
- Found levels of obedience to unjustified demands were very high
- 21 out of 22 nurses obeyed
- Milgram’s findings can be generalized to other settings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What study was conducted on the documentary about reality TV in France?

A
  • Participants thought they were contestants in a new game show
  • Paid to give (fake) electric shocks to other participants when ordered to do so
  • 80% of participants delivered the maximum shock of 460 volts to an ‘unconscious’ man
  • Participant displayed the same tension as those in Milgram’s study
    = demonstrates that the findings were not a one off
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What did Orne and Holland say?

A

Argued that participants only behave the way hey did as they didn’t believe shocks were real
> Means Milgram wasn’t testing what he thought he was
> Means the study lacks internal validity

14
Q

What’s another strength of Milgram’s study?

A
  • May lack external validity due to being conducted in a lab
  • Central feature was about the relationship between ‘experimenter’ and participant
  • Lab reflected wider authority relationships in real life
15
Q

Who critiques milgrams study?

A

Orne and Hollard
Perry
Baumind

16
Q

What did Perry do?

A

Listened to the recordings from the study and heard participants expressing doubts about the shocks

17
Q

What did Baumind say?

A

Criticized Milgram’s deception
- led participants to believe their role was selected at random and to believe they was electrocuting people
- Could be viewed as a betrayal of trust
- Could damage the reputation of psycholoists
- Could damage reputation of the research
- Could prevent participants from volunteering to another experiment again

18
Q
A
19
Q
A
20
Q
A