Obedience Flashcards
Define obedience
Type of social influence which causes a person to act in response to an order given by another person (usually someone with power or authority)
When did Milgrams study into obedience take place
1963
What is the research method for Milgram’s study?
Lab experiment, non participant controlled observation
Describe procedure for Milgram’s study
- Ppts and a confederate took a rigged draw for their role - ppt would always be ‘teacher’ and confederate ‘learner’
- Another confederate in a white lab coat was the experimenter
- Learner was strapped to a chair wired with electrodes & teacher instructed to give the learner increasing shocks when they gave an incorrect answer
- Shocks were demonstrated to the teacher but afterwards not real
- The experimenter continually told the teacher to continue the experiment
Who were the participants for Milgram’s study ?
40 male participants between 20-50 yrs old
What were the findings and conclusion to Milgram’s study?
- No ppts stopped below 300 volts, 12.5% stopped at 300
- 65% continued to the highest level
- ppts showed signs of extreme tension, 3 even had seizures
- Concluded that people obey authority even when acting against own morality/judgement
How was obedience affected by variations in Milgram’s study?
Proximity - when experimenter issued instructions by telephone obédience dropped to 21%
Location - When the the experiment took place in a rundown office rather than Yale, obedience dropped to 47.5%
Uniform - when experimenter was played by an ordinary member of the public, obedience dropped to 20%
Give strengths of Milgram’s study into obedience
+ Support from other research —> Hofling et al (1966) gave nurses dangerous orders of unknown drugs above dosage; 21/22 obeyed
however it was found when a familiar drug was used only 2/18 obeyed
Give limitations of Milgram’s study into obedience
– Lab study - low ecological validity due to artificial setting; doesn’t reflect obedience in daily life
— Gender bias - only investigated men & underestimated individual differences = beta bias; Sheridan & King found 100% of females compared to 54% males gave shocks to puppies in a similar experiment
however another study found little difference in men and women
— Unethical - no protection from psychological or physical harm as 3 had seizures, didn’t get full informed consent