Obediance Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is the autonomous state?

A

Where we are free to take responsibility for our actions and are free thinking.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is Milgram’s agency theory of obedience?

A

People born to obey are born to obey and obedience is need for stable society

Autonomous state- free will take responsibility for actions

Agentic state: controlled by authority figure, no responsibility for actions.

Agentic shift when we move between autonomous and agentic state

Moral strain: feeling of discomfort when we need to obey authority but feel it is wrong to do so

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are 2 supporting evidence of the agency theory?

A

Milgrams 1965 study showed 65% of participants shocked a man at 450 volts when told to by an authority figure, showing in agentic state we will obey authority.

Hofling found 21/22 nurses obeyed authority figure over phone to administer lethal overdose of drugs to patient.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are 2 critising evidence agaisnt agency theory?

A

Seddikes and Jackson’s zoo study found 58% of people obeyed zoo keeper in uniform than 38% in non uniform suggesting the strength of the authority figure matters in obeying

Individual differences- doesn’t take into account factors like authoritarian personality and assume everyone acts in same way

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What were Milgrams motivations for his study of obedience?

A

Wanted to test the theory that Germans were more likely to follow authority by using average American males.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was Milgrams study sample for the study of Obedience?

A

40 Males from New Haven USA aged 20-50.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How was Milgram’s study standardised?

A

Used standardised probs like “please continue” so high in reliability for studying obedience

Standardised prompts with stern manner to say if ppt wanted to leave.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

At which voltage level did Mr Wallace ‘fall silent’?

A

At 300 volts he stopped pounding on wall and shouting

At 315 Volts he fell silent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was the procedure of Milgram’s study?

A

40 men responded to newspaper ad. Paid $4.50. at Yale uni. Did a fixed draw to decide teacher and learner with ppt always being teacher

Mr Wallace gave pre-determined responses to word pairs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How were the participants protected from harm by Milgram?

A

At the end of the study he debreifed the ppt about what the test was really about and showed them Mr Wallace alive and well. Interview to check up on ppts months after to see if they were okay too.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What signs of moral strain did some of the ppts show in Milgrams study of obedience?

A

Sweating, trembling, stuttering, digging fingers into flesh,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What were the results of Milgrams study of obedience?

A

100% up to 300V, 65% carried on to the maximum of 450V whilst 35% didn’t and were defiant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was the aim of Milgrams Telephonic Instrutions experiment 7?

A

To see if how close the experimenter is to the ppt affects their obedience to authority.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What was the procedure of the telephonic Instructions study?

A

He gave the orders over the phone after giving the instructions face to face. at start the experimenter left the room and then he gave instructions and prods over phone.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What were the results of the Telephonic Instructions study?

A

Obedience levels dropped to 22.5% and 9/40 were wiling to give the 450V compared to 65% in original study. Ppt also lied about going up in voltage but stayed at the same level.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What was the aim of Milgrams run down office block experiment 10?

A

See if the change to a run down office block rather than Yale uni would affect obedience levels.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What was the procedure of the Milgram run down office block experiment?

A

He used sparsely furnished office in Bridgeport, 40 males selected by mail and were paid less than the original study. Everything else was same as original study.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What were the results of the Milgram run down office experiment?

A

Obedience levels dropped 47.5% compared to 65% in original study. Ppts showed doubt and called study “heartless”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What was the aim of Milgrams ordinary man gives orders experiment 13?

A

The aim was to see if obedience would change if an ordinary man was giving orders.

20
Q

What was the aim of burgers 2009 study into obedience?

A

See if Milgrams results could be replicated today, if people base behaviour of others on how to behave, and if there was any gender/personality diff in obedience.

21
Q

What is social impact theory?

A

It suggests the obedience of people are based on a number of factors due to the presence and actions of others.

22
Q

What is some supporting evidence of Social Impact theory?

A

Sedikides and Jackson found that ppts complied with Zoo keeper 58% above baseline compared to non uniformed person who was 35% above baseline. Legitimacy of authority is important when obeying.

23
Q

What is a Criticism of Social Impact Theory?

A

Hofling found 95% nurses took instructions over phone to admitted drug over maximum dose to patient. Shows people don’t need immediacy when obeying authority.

24
Q

How does the targets (people who are being influenced) affect obedience according to SIT?

A

If the people being targeted by obedience have a more authoritarian personality for example they may resist whatever is being told to them.

25
Q

How does the number of sources affect obedience according to SIT?

A

The more sources saying the same thing=more likely to influence the targets and make them be obedient.

26
Q

How does the strength of the source affect obedience according to SIT?

A

If the source is more legitimate authority figure who has status and knowledge they will have more affect on target.

27
Q

How does the Immediacy of the source affect obedience according to SIT?

A

If the source is a known figure (Parent or police etc) or is in close proximity to the target then they will have more affect.

28
Q

How does the Multipication effect of the source affect obedience according to SIT?

A

Increasing the number, strength and immediacy of the source increases social influence and makes targets more likely to obey.

uses formula f(SIN)

29
Q

How does the Divisional effect of the source affect obedience according to SIT?

A

Obedience levels will reduce if there are more targets than the source or if there is more than 3 sources.

30
Q

How could personality affect obedience?

A

Adorno’s authoritarian personality theory says ppl with this personality blindly obey ppl of higher status.

31
Q

How does culture affect obedience?

A

individualistic cultures less likely to obey than collectivist.
Miranda found 90% of students in Spain obey in Milgram’s study than 50% of UK ppts

32
Q

How was the shock generator used in Milgrams study used?

A

Sample shock of 45V given out to ppt

Generator with switches from 15-450 volts. If Wallace got answers wrong had to be shocked in intervals of 15V.

33
Q

What Qualitive data was collected in Milgram study about the participants?

A

Signs of moral strain like sweating or stuttering

34
Q

What was the procedure of Milgram’s ‘ordinary man gives orders’ study?

A

1 real person 2 confederates. Rigged draw. Experimenter told ppt to give unspecified level of shocks then confederate in normal clothes told ppt to increase shcosk by 15V.

35
Q

What was the results of Milgram’s ‘ordinary man gives orders’ study?

A

Obedience dropped from 65% in OG study to 20% suggesting orders given by ordinary man less effective as less legitimate

36
Q

What was the procedure of Burgers study?

A

Ad in newspaper paid $50, 140 applied. Could not taken 2 or more psych classes or had past abuse. Then had to do clinical interview.

70 ppts: 29 men 41 women.

37
Q

What are two strengths of Milgrams original study?

A

Used standardised prods like “you must go on” makes study more replicable and consistent

Quantative data like “65% of participants went up to 450 volts” so more objective and scientific

38
Q

What are two weaknesses of Milgrams original study?

A

Sample only used males in USA so can’t generalise results on obedience to women or other countries

There was protection from harm issues as people thought it was real- swearing and seizures- hurts psychology credibility

39
Q

What is locus of control?

A

Aspect of personal ti that explains who we assign responsibility/blame for cause of events

People with internal locus of control blame themselves so more likely to be resistant to obedience and those with external blame other so obey more

40
Q

What are 3 powers according the situational factors of obedience

A

Legitimate power: if authority is legitimate eg milgram lab coat

Reward power; held by those with certain recounts eg Milgrams paying $4.50 for research

Coercive power: threatening ppl with punishment if don’t obey like in milgram “you must go on”

41
Q

What happened in the base condition of burgers study?

A

Participants told it was about learning and memory and may be taped

Did a fixed draw so ppt was always teacher and was given test schock and shown shock generator from 15v to 150v

Learner said they had heart condition but researcher said the shocks are painful but no dangerous

At 150V teacher yelled and asked to get out and researcher used prompts to encourage ppts

42
Q

What happened in the model refusal condition of burgers stufy?

A

Followed same procedure of base condition but involved 2 confederates real ppt always teacher 2 and confederate teacher 1

The teacher began with no signs of distress until 70V and hesitateted and then refused at 90V and real ppt asked to continue

Experiment ended when ppt refused to confine or they pressed 150V and read then next word then they were debriefed and introduce to confederates

43
Q

What were the results and conclusion of burgers study?

A

Base condition 70% obedience up to 150V compared 65% in milgram

In model condition 63.3%

Little difference begeeen men (6% diff) in base control

Personality did not have significant affect on obedience levels with only those with high desire for control being less likely to obey in base donation

Concluded people obey similar level today and obidnved between genders no significant differences and seeing someone else refusing to follow instructions had no impact on obedience

44
Q

What did the experimenter wear and act like in Milgrams study?

A

Wore grey lab coat and maintained a stern manner

45
Q

What was the conclusion of Milgrams study

A

Obedience was product of situation someone’s in rather than personal characteristics as in presence of authority figure will go into agentic state even if experience moral strain