NRMs and NAMs Flashcards
Wallis
Categorises NRMs into world-accepting, world-accommodating and world-rejecting based on their interaction with society
World-affirming NRMs
Accept the world as it is and therefore promise their followers help to achieve mainstream goals. They are non-exclusive and are tolerant of other religions e.g. Scientology
World-accommodating NRMs
Neither accept nor reject the world, as they believe that spiritual matters are more important than worldly matters. These are breakaways from Churches and therefore have most in common with denominations e.g. Neo-Pentecostalism
World-rejecting NRMs
These are highly critical of the outside world and seek radical societal change. Members break from society to live communally and follow conservative codes. They are millenarian - they expect intervention to change the world e.g. the Moonies and Jim Jones’ People’s Temple
Weber
Those who are marginalised turn to world rejecting NRMs as they offer a “theodicy of disprivilege” whereby the NRM offers an explanation and solution to oppression
Stark and Bainbridge
The W/C join world rejecting NRMs for compensation in their next life and to feel part of something bigger than themselves; M/C join world affirming NRMs due to focus on career/material goals (Relative deprivation)
Wilson
Sects offer a solution to the uncertainty of social change - e.g. during the period of industrialisation Methodism emerged
What other two motives do individuals have for joining an NRM?
Pragmatism and the spiritual void
Niebuhr
Sects tend to be short-lived or compromise and become a denomination for three reasons: a death of a leader, the Protestant ethic effect or the second generation effect
Stark and Bainbridge
The Sectarian cycle:
1: A sect forms after a breakaway from a Church.
2: Initial fervour due to a charismatic leader that creates tension between the sect and society.
3: Denominationalism (Protestant ethic)
4: Establishment - sect becomes world accepting.
5: Further schism as less privileged members break away and form new sects.
Drane
The growth of NAMs is evidence of postmodernism and the failure of science
Bruce
Sees the focus on individualism as late modern
Heelas and Woodhead
Found there was a rise in the holistic milieu whereby females particularly were engaging in new forms of religiosity (NAMs). Features of NAMs include self-spirituality and the value being placed on experience