Non-Military key moments Flashcards
Antebellum: Missouri Compromise, 1820
2 Million square miles West of Mississippi River is split at latitude of 36/30
Slavery is not permitted North of that line
Missouri is an exception to that rule
Antebellum: Opposition to Congressional interference in slavery
Senator John C. Calhoun, Feb 1847, introduces resolutions saying congress doesn’t have the right to exclude slavery from any territory
Antebellum: Nat Turner’s Rebellion
August 22, 1831
Slave rebellion that took place in Southampton County, Virginia
Indiscriminate killing of White people, slaves freed
Approx. 65 killed
Approx. 200 Whites killed in retaliations
Sparks fears of slave dissent across whole South
Antebellum: The Liberty Party
- Founded 1839, abolitionist
- 1844 election, had only secured 3% of the vote
Anti-Slavery views:
radicals: legal grounds for complete abolition of slavery in the states
moderates: coalition with Whigs/Democrats. Aim first to keep slavery out of the territories, then think about the whole.
John P. Hale is nominated
Anti-Slave democrats and Whigs align with disillusioned members of Liberty Party –> Free Soil Party.
–> Free Soilers nominated Martin Van Buren, Hale backs Van Buren
“Free Soilers made slavery the campaign’s central issue”
Antebellum: Slave states admitted to Republic by 1846
Louisiana, Missouri, Arkansas, Florida, Texas
Only Iowa, admitted 1646, was not a slave state
Antebellum: The Annexation of Texas
1845
Added major slave state to the Republic
Antebellum: The Wilmot Proviso, 1850
- Resolution by Northern Congressmen to prohibit slavery in territories acquired in the Mexican-American War of 1846-8
- Believed by Polk and supporters that slavery was not an issue of the Mexican conflict as the land wasn’t fertile enough to plant
- David Wilmot proposes that acquisition of territory is conditional upon there never being slavery in those territories
- Also political tensions being settled. Old grievance of Van Buren being denied the nomination for refusing to endorse annexation of Texas.
Antebellum: America - Mexico Conflict
Began May 1846
Different notions of progress: Democrats wanted extended space, Whigs wanted improvement with time
Main aim (of Polk, Democrat) was to acquire more territory for the republic (49)
New Mexico, California, Mexico City
Some desire to conquer the whole of mexico! –> Triumph of ‘manifest destiny’ doctrine
Ended Feb 1848
Antebellum: Why did Ralph Waldo Emerson comment that ‘Mexico will poison us’
Large acquisition of territories caused polarization of opinion, as Northerners feared that this would become a slave empire
Antebellum: Compromise of 1850
Background:
- John C. Calhourn writes ‘Address’ on instances of Northern aggression, opposing the admission of California as a free state
- onlt 2/48 whigs signed, as didn’t want to undermine Z. Taylor (new President, Whig)
- Taylor wanted to Admit new states and started proceedings to see them become fully fledged states
- Taylor also openly anti-slavery and saw no need for its “extension” (1849)
Tensions:
- South threatens secession if its rights are not protected
- A. Stevens: “necessary preparations of men and money, arms and munition, ect., to meet the emergency” are required
- Southerners and Northerners have fights in the House, fail to elect speaker
- Plans for convention of Southern slave states to discuss the Northern question
Compromise:
- Jan 1850, eight resolutions:
- Admit california, organise Mexican cession with no discussion of slavery
- Confirms boundary of Texas in favour of New Mexico. Prevents further extension of slavery into New Mexico but compensates Texas with finances
- Abolish slave trade in Columbia but guarantee slaving itself
- Last two resolutions: prevent congressional interference over inter-state slave trade, and provide strong Fugitive Slave Law
Antebellum: which three factors helped to increase anti-slavery sentiment in the North
- Second Great Awakening
- Fugitive slave law
- -> Incompatible visions of Christian love and re-capturing and punishing someone running for their freedom
-Harriet Beecher Stowe publishes ‘Uncle Tom’s Cabin’ published as one volume (originally publishes serially in an anti-slavery newspaper) in 1852. Sold out 300 000 copies in one year
‘it is not possible to measure precisely the political influence of Uncle Tom’s Cabin…Yet few contemporaries doubted its power’
Antebellum: How did the South react to Uncle Tom’s Cabin?
‘uncle Tom’s Cabin struck a raw nerve in the South’
New Orleans Crescent: ‘there never before was anything so detestable’
Counter-texts published such as Uncle Ronin in His Cabin in Virginia and Tom Without One in Boston
Antebellum: Kansas Nebraska Act
Background:
- Settlers and land developers eyeing upe Kansas
- Wanted a railroad to California, but that would require cessions from Indians and for land to be made territory
- Southerners not in a hurry to make it a territory, it lay North of the 36 30 line
- Stephen A. Douglas wanted to reorganise Nebraska territory to include that North of the line included in the Louisiana Purchase
- Bill of 1853 shut down by Southern senators, who feared the slaveholding rights of Missouri (which would be surrounded by free territory would be encroached on)
- If Douglas wanted Nebraska, would have to repeal ban on slavery there
Nebraska Bill, early 1854
- Explicit repeal of Missouri compromise
- Settlers entitled to decide whether or not territories will have slavery
- F. Street mess (Southern opposition), Douglas, go to President with ultimatum in Jan: repeal or lose South
- -> Bill passed
Charles Sumner’s ‘Crime Against Kansas’ speech, May 19-20 1856
- laments that Kansas has been ‘compell[ed] to the hateful embrace of slavery’
- Later, Preston brooks beats him with a tipped cane
- Causes accusations of the collapse of Free speech in the South in the New York Evening Post
Antebellum: Dred Scott
Background
- Dred Scott, slave, marries in a free territory
- Sues widow of owner for his freedom on the grounds that he’s long been a resident in a free territory
- Loses suit, re-trial agreed in 1850, loses appeal in 1852
- Suggests Missouri courts under pressure from pro-slave forces
- 1856, case is heard at the supreme court; Southern majority, seen by pro-slavers as a way to end constitutional dispute in their favour
Supreme Court case:
Questions,
1) does he have the right to sue, as a citizen?
2) Has living in a free territory made him free?
3) Was the territory free (did Congress have the right to ban slavery in Louisiana Purchase North of line?
Ruling, March 6th 1657
- Dred Scott was not a citizen of the United States and did not have a right to sue in the federal courts
- NOT an ‘orbiter dictum’ (not before the courts, no legal force)
- Living in ‘free’ territory did not make him free when he returned to Missouri
- Ban on slavery in Missouri deemed unconstitutional as it was a ban on property (contradicts clause five)
Consequence
- By federal authority, it is deemed unconstitutional to ban slavery in any state
Antebellum: John Brown
Plans for a raid:
- Wanted to rent farm across Potomac River from Harper’s Ferry
- Would seize U.S. Armoury, arm slaves, take territory
- Several, including Frederick Douglas, refuse to show
- Resolves to proceed in mid-october
Raid
- 16th Oct, 16 men raid Harpers Ferry after dark
- Capture armoury, send men out to arm slaves
- Mid morning, Oct 17th, armoury under Sniper attack
- 11 killed that afternoon
- Marines enter fire-engine building where Brown makes last stand, hostages rescued and raid ends.
Impact
- 11 raiders, inc. Brown, Hung.
- Illustrates that Southerners simultaneously feared slave insurrection and insisted they were treated well
- Fears of South-wide uprisings
Antebellum: Election of Abraham Lincoln, 1860
Why was he a good candidate?
- Abolitionist ex-Whig
- Honest Abe’
- Embodied American Dream
- Won support ‘partly on the basis of his speeches’
Nominated at Chicago convention
United as didn’t want to identify with principles that may lead to disunion. Therefore will only identify with the constitution
General Interest
Abraham Lincoln is elected the 16th president of the United States over a deeply divided Democratic Party, becoming the first Republican to win the presidency. Lincoln received only 40 percent of the popular vote but handily defeated the three other candidates: Southern Democrat John C. Breckinridge, Constitutional Union candidate John Bell, and Northern Democrat Stephen Douglas, a U.S. senator for Illinois.
inauguration on March 4, 1861
Antebellum: Founding of the Confederate States of America, Feb- March 1861
Feb 14th 1861, Montgomery
- Seven slave states represented
- Upper Southern states such as Missouri did not initially join the CSA, why? Slave pop.
(i) 47% of population was slaves, but only 20% of upper South - Temporary constitution drafted in six days along with provisional P and VP
- Permanent constitution 1 month later
- Moderate in nature, ‘fire-eaters’ took the ‘back seat’
- Verbatim of original document, to give legitimacy ?
- Limited executive, Presidents get one 6 year term
- Possible to impeach state senators
Antebellum: The Crittenden Compromise. Dec 18th 1860
- Named after John J. Crittenden
- Drafted by the senate’s ‘Committee of Thirteen’
- Would prevent the abolition of slavery by any further amendment to the constitution, and would allow for extension of slavery
lincoln: “The tug has to come, and better now, than any time hereafter”
Antebellum: Lincoln’s first inaugural address, March 4th 1861
‘a sign of future policy’
- Address was crucial and could affect secession
- Multiple drafts, 2 months of preparation
- Theme was the preservation of the Union
- Aggressive line of attack was to pledge to use all resources at his disposal to save the union. Moderated in initial drafts
- More moderate line was to pledge not to interfere with the already existing institution of slavery
- Wanted to appeal to Southern patriotism
- Ambiguous language is intentional, doesn’t speak about ‘reclaiming’ federal property, but collecting ‘duties and imports’ – How could that be done if it was under Confed control? War?
- Stresses that North and South are not enemies, but friends, and must be united “by the better angels of our nature”
War: Why was the fate of the Upper South so important?
- States of the Upper South contained valuable resources and much of the population
- 3/4 of industrial capacity
- 1/2 of horses
- 3/5ths of livestock/crops
- Key commanders such as Lee/Jackson
War: Secession after Sumter
- April 13th, celebration in Richmond on the fall of Sumter
- Confed flag replaces US national flag
- -> SECESSION: VIRGINIA, ARKANSAS, N. CAROLINA, TENNESSEE
- April 15th, Lincoln issues military requisition
- Kentucky, Missouri, Tennessee all reject, citing loyalty to Southern brothers and unconstitutional/illegal nature of Lincoln’s summons
- Seen as ‘unconstitutional coercion of sovreign states’
VIRGINIA
- April 17th, Virginia seceedes by convention vote of 88:55
- ‘Virginia brought crucial resources to the Confederacy’
- Population, industrial capacity equal to all previous Confederate States combined, and R. E. Lee.
ARKANSAS
- May 6th, 65:5
NORTH CAROLINA
- May 20th, unanimous vote for secession
TENNESSEE
- June 8th, 104,913: 47, 238
- Mountainous east- Tennessee cast 70% agains - pro localism
NOTE: After Virginia, ‘snowball effect’ saw conventions reflect increasing enthusiasm for secession