Non-Fatal Offences Against the Person Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

The Non-Fatal Offences Against the Person:

A
  • Wounding/ Causing GBH
  • Malicious wounding/ inflicting GBH
  • Assault occasioning Actual Bodily Harm (ABH)
  • Battery
  • Technical/ Common Assault
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Key statutes for wounding or inflicting GBH:

A
  • Offences Against the Person Act 1861

- Criminal Justice Act 1988

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Actus Reus for wounding or inflicting GBH:

A
  • Unlawfully wounding/ infliction of GBH

- Main elements: Unlawful/Wound or GBH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Wound:

A

Breaking both layers of skin. Moriarty v Brooks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Unlawful:

A

Not in Self-defence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What counts as GBH?

A

Really serious harm. DPP v Smith

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Who determines whether harm is ‘really serious’?

A

Jury. They judge defendant against ‘contemporary social standards’. Golding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does the case of Meachen have to say about GBH?

A

Injuries may be regarded as really serious even if they don’t cause V great pain.
Meachen 2009

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Mens Rea for Maliciously Wounding or inflicting GBH?

A

Maliciously means with intention or Cunningham (1957) Recklessness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Lord Diplock’s view:

A

Enough that D foresaw some physical harm, albeit minor.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Direct intention:

A

Was Ds main aim/purpose to inflict some harm.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Oblique intention:

A
  • Was harm virtually certain as result of Ds actions?
  • Did D appreciate this was the case?
    Woolin
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Cunningham 1957 recklessness:

A
  • Was D aware that there was a risk his conduct would cause some harm?
  • Was risk an unreasonable one for D to take, based on circumstances known to D?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Legislation for wounding or causing GBH with intent?

A

Offences Against the Person Act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Four offences wounding or causing GBH creates?

A
  1. Wounding with intent to do GBH.
  2. Causing GBH with intent to do GBH
  3. Maliciously wounding with intent to prevent lawful apprehension of any person.
  4. Maliciously causing GBH with intent to prevent lawful apprehension of any person.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Actus Reus for wounding or causing GBH with intent?

A
  • Wound/ GBH

- Substantial cause

17
Q

Mens Rea for wounding or causing GBH with intent?

A
  • D intended to cause GBH OR

- D intended to resist/ prevent lawful apprehension of another..

18
Q

What about consent?

A

Only if it is in the public interest.

R v Browm