Non-fatal offences against the person Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Different non-fatal offences against the person

A

s. 18 (OAPA 1861)
s. 20 (OAPA 1861)
s. 47 (OAPA 1861)
s. 39 (Criminal Justice Act 1988)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

s. 18 OAPA 1861 (GBH)

[life sentence]

A

AR:
Wound or inflict GBH

MR:

  • wound with intent to commit GBH; or
  • GBH with intent to commit GBH; or
  • wound/GBH with intent to resist or prevent arrest/detention
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Bruising/internal bleeding is NOT wounding

A

Eisenhower

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

wound = breaking of both layers of the skin/drawing of blood

A

Moriarty v Brookes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

GBH = ‘really serious harm’

A

DPP v Smith

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

GBH can include really serious psychiatric harm, if a recognised condition

A

R v Burstow

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

s. 20 OAPA 1861 (GBH)

[5 yr sentence]

A

AR:
wound or inflict GBH

MR:
‘maliciously’
- intention or recklessness as to ABH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

s. 47 OAPA 1861 (ABH)

[5 yr sentence]

A

AR:
Simple/physical assault
causing ABH

MR:
intention or recklessness as to the infliction of unlawful personal force ie. physical assault

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

ABH = any hurt/injury calculated to interfere with the health and comfort of the victim

A

R v Miller

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

ABH may include psychiatric harm if a recognised condition

A

R v Ireland

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

D only need to have intended or been reckless to physical assault in order to establish MR

A

R v Savage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

s. 39 CJA 1988 (physical assault)

strict liability

A

AR:
Infliction of unlawful personal force upon the victim
(no injury required)

MR:
Intention or recklessness as to the infliction of unlawful force

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Infliction (of unlawful personal force) may be direct

ie. setting a dog on the victim

A

Haystead

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

s. 39 CJA 1988 (simple assault)

no force necessary

A

AR:
Acts or words that cause victim to apprehend immediate and unlawful personal force

MR:
Intention or recklessness as to the victim apprehending such force

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

‘acts or words’ (for simple assault) can include silence

A

R v Ireland

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Authority for AR of simple assault

A

Fagan v Metropolitan Police Commission

17
Q

Victim need only fear that force COULD occur immediately (for simple assault)

A

R v Burstow

18
Q

Authority for MR of simple assault

A

R v Venna

19
Q

Key cases for non-fatal offences against the person

A

Eisenhower (bruising/internal bleeding is not wounding)
Moriarty v Brookes (wound = breaking of both layers of skin)
DPP v Smith (GBH = really serious harm)
R v Burstow (GBH can include really serious psychiatric harm; victim need only fear that force COULD occur immediately)
R v Miller (ABH = any hurt calculated to interfere with health and comfort of victim)
R v Ireland (ABH may include psychiatric harm; act could include silence)
Haystead (infliction may be indirect)