Key Cases Flashcards
Woolmington v DPP
Burden of proof on prosecution to prove defendants guilt beyond reasonable doubt
Cunningham
Test for recklessness:
Did D foresee a risk and then go on to take it? (Subjective)
R v Woollin
Test for indirect intent:
Was consequence virtually certain to occur?
If yes, did D foresee consequence as virtually certain to occur?
R v Ireland
ABH may include psychiatric harm if a recognised condition
R v Burstow
Victim need only fear that force could occur immediately
Maxwell v DPP Northern Ireland
If D has range of defences within contemplation, he is liable as accomplice for whichever one is committed
NCB v Gamble
2 elements of MR for accomplice:
Intention to do the act that aided principal
Knowledge of circumstances
R v Jogee
Authority for requirement to have intention to assist or encourage crime
Foresight is evidence of intent but no more
DPP v Gomez
Consent of owner is irrelevant as to appropriation
R v Atakpu
Cannot steak property more than once but appropriation can be continuous
R v Adomaku
5 elements of AR for gross negligence manslaughter
Duty of are owed by D to V
Breach of duty
Risk that Ds conduct could cause death (objective)
Evidence that breach DID cause death
Jury’s conclusion that D fell so far below standard of reasonable person in that situation