Non-fatal Offences against the person 1+2 Flashcards

1
Q

How are non-fatal offences structured in terms of severity?

A

They are arranged as a “ladder of harm,” progressing from least to most serious in terms of harm caused and corresponding penalties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Are assault and battery statutory or common law offences?

A

They are common law offences but are chargeable under s39 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Where are assault and battery tried, and what is the maximum penalty?

A

They are summary-only offences, tried in the Magistrates’ Court, with a maximum sentence of six months’ imprisonment or a fine

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the key legal distinction between assault and battery?

A
  • Assault: Causing someone to apprehend imminent unlawful force.
  • Battery: The actual infliction of unlawful force.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Is physical contact necessary for assault?

A

No, it is based on apprehension of force rather than actual contact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Name a key case that established words alone can constitute assault.

A

Ireland; Burstow [1998] – Silent phone calls caused psychological harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the mens rea for assault?

A

Intention or recklessness as to causing the victim to apprehend imminent unlawful force (Venna [1975])

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Must the force in battery be violent or harmful?

A

No, even minimal or indirect force suffices

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Name a case where touching someone’s clothing was held to be battery.

A

Thomas [1985] – Touching a person’s clothing was enough for battery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Can an omission constitute battery?

A

Yes, if there is a duty to act (DPP v Santana Bermudez [2003])

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is meant by “actual bodily harm”?

A

Harm that is more than trivial but need not be serious (Chan-Fook [1994])

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Can psychological harm amount to ABH?

A

Yes, if it is a recognized medical condition (Ireland; Burstow [1998])

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the two ways to commit an offence under s20 OAPA 1861?

A
  1. Malicious wounding, OR

2, Malicious infliction of grievous bodily harm (GBH)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is meant by “wounding” under s20?

A

A break in the skin, including internal injuries (Moriarty v Brookes [1834])

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the definition of GBH?

A

Really serious harm (DPP v Smith [1961])

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What makes s18 OAPA 1861 more serious than s20?

A

It requires specific intent to cause really serious harm

17
Q

What is the mens rea of s18 GBH?

A

Intention to cause GBH or resist lawful arrest

18
Q

What is the maximum sentence for s18 OAPA 1861?

A

Life imprisonment

19
Q

What are the 3 key principles of consent as a defence

A

1) Actual consent negates unlawfulness

2) Belief in consent (even if mistaken) may suffice

3) Consent must be express or implied and effective

20
Q

When is consent not valid?

A

If the victim lacks capacity or is unaware of critical facts

21
Q

Give an example of ineffective consent due to lack of capacity.

A

Burrell v Harmer [1967] – Minors could not give valid consent to tattoos

22
Q

When does fraud vitiate consent?

A

When it relates to the nature or purpose of the act, not just identity (Tabassum [2000])

23
Q

In what situations is consent to serious harm allowed?

A
  1. Rough horseplay (Jones [1986])
  2. Contact sports (Barnes [2004])
  3. Body modifications (Wilson [1996])
24
Q

Can consent be a defence in sadomasochistic activities?

A

Generally, no, unless the harm is minor (Brown [1993])