Mens Rea Flashcards

1
Q

What does mens rea mean?

A

Means guilty mind. Refers to the mental element of a crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the 2 types of intention?

A

1) Direct Intention
2) Oblique (indirect) intention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What does direct intention in mens rea mean?

A

D has a clear aim or purpose to bring about a specific result

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What does oblique intention in mens rea means?

A

D’s primary aim may not be the result, but the outcome is a virtual certainty of their actions, and D foresees this as such

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

When is a defendant reckless?

A

When they foresee a risk and proceed despite it (and taking that risk is unreasonable)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the two types of recklessness and their definitions?

A
  1. Subjective Recklessness = What was in D’s mind. D must foresee the risk to be convicted
  2. Objective Recklessness = What would’ve been in the mind of a reasonable person
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are case examples for the two types of recklessness?

A
  • Subjective = R v Cunningham (1957)
  • Objective = R v Caldwell (1981)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the old law on dishonesty, who was this established by?

A

R v Ghosh (1982) established a two-part test:
1.(Objective test) = Was D’s conduct dishonest by the standards of reasonable people?

2.(Subjective test) = Did D realise their conduct was dishonest by those standards?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the 2 main criticisms of Ghosh?

A
  • Allowed defendants with skewed moral views to escape liability
  • Created uncertainty by relying on jury interpretation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the new law on dishonesty and who was it established by?

A

Ivey v Genting Casinos (2017)
1. What was D’s actual knowledge or belief about the facts (according to the court, not D)?

  1. Was D’s conduct dishonest by the standards of ordinary, decent people?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is negligence in Mens Rea?

A

Failure to meet the standard of care expected of a reasonable person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What cases is negligence usually seen in?

A

Cases of gross negligence manslaughter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the key case for negligence?

A

Adomako (1995)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the two main “exceptions” to Mens Rea?

A
  1. Strict Liability
  2. Ulterior Mens Rea
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is strict liability?

A

Some offences do not require proof of mens rea for at least one element of the actus reus

  • Guilt can be established by conduct/omission regardless of mindset
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is an example of strict liability?

A

Sexual Offences Act 2003, s.5– Sexual activity with a child under 13 is an offence regardless of D’s knowledge or belief about the victim’s age

17
Q

What is ulterior Mens Rea and what is an example of it?

A

The Mens Rea element extends beyond the corresponding Actus Reus

  • Example:Burglaryrequires proof of entry into a buildingwith intent to steal, even if no theft occurs
18
Q

What happened in the Winzar v Chief Constable of Kent
(1983) case?

A

The defendant was charged with being drunk in a public
place even though his presence on the highway was
involuntary
- this did not exempt him from liability

19
Q

What was the key issue in the Woollin (1998) case?

A

Whether Woollin intended the
death or serious harm of his baby

20
Q

What is the significance of the term “culpable state of
mind”?

A

A culpable state of mind signifies that a person acted
with intention, knowledge, recklessness, or negligence, which is necessary for establishing criminal liability