Non fatal offences Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Fagan 1969

A
  • Intentionally or recklessly causing the V to apprehend immediate unlawful force is the MR for assault and battery
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Savage and Parmenter 1991

A
  • Approved what was said in Fagan about the MR for assault and battery
  • The prosecution have to prove only that D intended or foresaw the risk of SOME physical harmW
  • In parmenter the jury could convict under S20 only if S foresaw that some physical harm even though it may be of minor character might result
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the AR of battery?

A
  • application of unlawful force
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is Section 47?

A
  • An assault or battery that has caused ABH
  • An injury that is more than transient and trifling that has caused injury
  • ABH is charged when the max sentence for assault or battery of 6 months is not seen as enough
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the MR of Section 47?

A
  • The same as the assault or battery as D did not need to prove they intended the ABH
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the definition of Section 20?

A
  • Whosoever shall unlawfully and maliciously wound or inflict GBH upon any other person either with or without any weapon or instrument shall be guilty.
  • So basically to wound or cause GBH
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Ireland and Burstow

A
  • Showed there was no difference in the words cause and inflict as they both meant the same thing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Moriarty v Brooks 1832

A
  • Defined a wound as the cutting of both layers of skin

- It doesn’t have to be serious, a scratch could count

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

R v Smith 1961

A
  • GBH meant really serious harm
  • injury resulting in permanent disability
  • Appropriate expert evidence is essential to the prove the extent of the injury
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Cunningham 1957

A
  • Set out the definition of maliciously ‘intention to do the harm or recklessness to the fact the harm would occur’
  • Takes a subjective meaning as in Cunningham he subjectivity did not know what he was doing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Mowatt 1968

A
  • The meaning of maliciously as defined in Cunningham was applied
  • Showing the subjective element worked
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the definition of Section 18?

A
  • Unlawfully and maliciously would or cause GBH with intent to do GBH with intent to resist or prevent law
  • MAX life imprisonment
  • Not simply GBH with intent
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly