Non-Experimental Methods Flashcards
What is an observation?
when a researcher does not manipulate a variable to see what effect this has on another variable, instead, they simply record what happens
What is a naturalistic observation?
an observational study conducted in the environment where behaviour would normally occur e.g. work, school, public streets
What are the strengths of using a naturalistic observation?
- Participants in natural environment, likely they are doing what they would normally be doing - high ecological validity
- Often participants do now know they are being observed so behaviour unaffected by demand characteristics or evaluation apprehension
- Used in situations where other techniques unethical/impractical (e.g. studying children who do not respond well to experiments)
- Depending on the type of observation, detail may be richer and more detailed than in many experiments
What are limitations of using naturalistic observations?
- Since no variables are manipulated, there is no control over extraneous variables, cause and effect relationships cannot be found
- May be possible observer bias influences results
- Replication can be difficult - hard to check reliability
- Ethical concerns due to privacy
- Also, confidentiality
How can observer bias be reduced?
Using inter-observer reliability
What is a controlled observation?
an observation study where the researcher controls some variables - often takes place in a lab setting
What are strengths of using a controlled observation?
- Less risk of unwanted extraneous variables influencing behaviour than with naturalistic observations which increases researcher’s ability to interpret the findings
- Easier to replicate due to element of control to check findings for reliability
- Participants would have agreed to come in to be observed, less of an issue with consent
What are the limitations of using a controlled observation?
- Participants will know they’re being observed - may affect behaviour due to demand characteristics or evaluation apprehension, may reduce the internal validity of the research
- Observer bias, may influence the results to fit their theory
- Being in a controlled environment may affect how participants behave, especially if that environment is artificial which may reduce the ecological validity
What is a covert observation?
When the participant is not aware they’re being observed
What are strengths of using a covert observation?
- Removes the problem of participants’ knowledge that they’re being observed - increases the internal validity
What are limitations of using a covert observation?
- Ethical issues - cannot give consent
What is an overt observation?
participants are informed that they are being observed
What are strengths of using overt observation?
- Removes problems with consent
What are the limitations of using overt observations?
- As they know they’re being observed, may change their behaviour which will obviously affect the internal validity of the research
What are participant observations?
an observation study where the researcher actually joins in with the group or takes part in the situation they are observing
What are the strengths of participant observations?
- some groups hard to research without joining them e.g. religious cults, and participant observations offer a way to study these kinds of groups
- the direct involvement of the researchers in the group being studied means they can develop a deep understanding of the motives and behaviour of those being observed
- additional source of information
What are the limitations of participant observations?
- objective information becomes more difficult as de to subjectivity, there may be bias as they are part of the group and make the group appear more positively
- may be difficult to record observations at same time as taking part, may have to record these later which may be unreliable
- ethical issue - participants may disclose information to researcher who is part of the group that they would not disclose to someone they thought was separate to that group
What is a non-participant observation?
when the researcher does no become part of the group being observed
What are the strengths of a non-participant observation?
- as researcher is not part of the group, presence in less likely to affect behaviour of the group members, particularly if it is covert - internal validity higher
- observer is able to be more objective if they are not part of the group - they are not biased to portray the group in a positive light
- observations can be recorded at the time, reducing concerns about unreliability of the observer’s memory affecting the data recorded
- no ethical issue of betrayal of trust
What are limitations of using a non-participants observation?
- as the observer is not part of the group, they lack access to the objective experience of group membership
- not being in the group makes it harder for the researcher to gain a deep understanding of the meaning of the behaviour being observed
- difficult to make observations over a long period of time without being part of the group
What is an unstructured observation?
when the researcher simply records all of the relevant behaviour
What are strengths of unstructured observations?
- allows for rich, detailed descriptions of the behaviour produced
What are limitations of using unstructured observations?
- may be too much to record
- open to observer bias as they only record behaviours that are interesting to them personally
What are behavioural categories?
key behaviours, or, collections of behaviour, that the researcher conducting the observation will pay attention to and record - involve coding, or rating behaviour, rather than trying to describe it