No Road ☆ Flashcards

1
Q

What is No Road about?

A
  • Ending of a relationship that the speaker is trying to make sense of their life, without their partner. Confusion/uncertainty/doubt.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the significance of the title No Road?

A

Extended metaphor of road = absence of relationship and a place (the future of the couple).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

‘Since we agreed to let the road between us
Fall to disuse’

A
  • Extended metaphor of the road = absence/end of their relationship. - Enjambment emphasises this separation.
  • Passivity/neglection in allowing the relationship to become like this.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

‘bricked our gates up, planted trees to screen us, And turned all times eroding agents lose’

A
  • Tricolon/Listing actively measures the conscious efforts made to form barriers.
  • Time has forced the separation, personified as a slowly destructive and undeniable force.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

‘Silence, and space, and strangers - our neglect’

A
  • Polysyndeton - suggesting their choice to isolate, reflects stages of disintegration of relationship.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

‘Leaves drift unswept, perhaps; grass creeps unmown’

A
  • Repeated prefix ‘un’ - relationship defined by sense of stasis - nothing has happened. ‘Perhaps’ - lacks certainty in why relationship has ended and must forge future without her.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

‘So clear it stands, so little overgrown’

A
  • Intensifier/anaphoric repetition - surprised by how little has changed, their connection remains. Sense of hope for relationship if an active choice was made.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

‘A little longer, And time would be the stronger’

A
  • Faith in time to force a change. Repeated personification of time, has the ability to disintegrate their remaining connection.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

‘Drafting a world where no such road will run from you to me’

A
  • Separation becomes more distinct, as change to singular pronouns from ‘we’ to ‘you’ ‘me’ . Attempts to make sense of this new identity.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

‘like a cold sun’

A
  • Oxymoronic simile. Separation is unnatural, strange, bleak and fundamentally devoid of something essential to his life.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

‘Rewarding others is my liberty.
Not to prevent it is my will’s fulfillment.
Willing it my ailment’ ☆

A
  • Syntax becomes confusing and shifts - ending feels muddled/complex with the language.
  • Trying to grapple with why relationship ended and can come to no conclusion. Time is evidently more powerful than human action.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

‘Willing it, my ailment’

A

His desire - his ailment/burden - is that he prefers solitude, concludes that being alone is much less complex.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Rhythm and Rhyme of No Road:

A
  • Ends on a rhyming couplet emphasising inner conflict the speaker feels about ending of relationship.
  • Sestets (6) - regularity - inevitability of time and steady disintegration of relationship.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

A03: What did Larkin compare to Wordsworth?

A

‘Deprivation is to me what daffodils were to Wordsworth’ : Inspired by a lack of.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

A03: No Road was written in 1951. Who did Larkin break off an engagement to then?

A

Ruth Bowman

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

A03: Larkin was loosely associated with the Movement writers. What was their writing like?

A

Unsentimental, honest and rooted in everyday experience, rational, pragmatic.