NMR 4 Flashcards

1
Q

How do you determine structure by NMR

A
  1. Multiple repeats of calculation where using list of structural restraints
  2. Each time starting from random coil version of polypeptide
  3. Compare resulting structures by overlaying them
  4. Highly flexible regions of proteins can access multiple conformations of too short duration to produce structural restraints:
  5. their conformation therefore differs in each member of the ensemble.
  6. Such regions are usually excluded from the rmsd calculation.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are Limitations of NMR

A
  1. Limitations largely relate to resolution and sensitivity
  2. Low sensitivity due to small DE – hence small population difference between energy levels
  3. Bigger molecule – more nuclei – more peaks/signals
  4. Bigger molecule – peaks/signals become broader
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Use of NMR to study protein interactions

A
  1. mapping of binding site(s)
  2. binding-induced folding
  3. drug discovery
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Types of complexes that can be studied by NMR

A
  1. Protein-protein
  2. Protein-DNA/RNA
  3. Protein-ligand (e.g. -drug), protein-carbohydrate, protein-lipid
  4. DNA-drug and RNA-drug
  5. Cellular machines/assemblies (e.g. chaperones, proteasomes)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

When is NMR preferred over XRC

A
  1. Some complexes may not crystallise, or not crystallise in a biologically relevant conformation e.g. when interactions are weak due to the cell’s need for transient, reversible binding
  2. Crystal packing forces may distort molecular interactions
  3. NMR is very well suited to, but not limited to, studying complexes involving weak interactions (Kd up to 10-2 M)
  4. Ideal: combine techniques
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

NMR methods to study interactions

A
  1. Differential isotope labelling: for example, only one component of a bimolecular complex is labelled with 15N.
  2. Combine differential isotope labelling with one or more of approaches like:
  3. Intermolecular NOEs: NMR peaks that result from two molecules being close together. Using both intramolecular and intermolecular NOEs, plus other restraints, detailed 3D structure of a complex can be determined.
  4. Chemical shift changes: usually indicate direct involvement of nuclei in binding and can be used to map interface between two molecules.
  5. Caveat: structure (and therefore chemical shifts) may change beyond the immediate vicinity of the binding site – reflects cooperative nature of proteins (groups of amino acids acting as networks).
  6. Measurements of motion: measure motional changes upon interaction.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Differential isotope labelling

A
  1. The two (or more) components of a complex are prepared separately.
  2. One component uniformly isotope labelled (e.g. 15N);
  3. other component contains natural abundance isotopes (e.g. 99.6% 14N / 0.4% 15N).
  4. The labelled and unlabelled components are mixed.
  5. In an NMR experiment that depends on scalar coupling between 15N and 1H, only the component with 15N nuclei (the “labelled” component) will produce signals in the NMR spectrum. The 0.4% 15N in the “unlabelled” component is too low to detect – the “unlabelled” component is “NMR silent”.
  6. Could equally use carbon, for example replace 12C by 13C in one component.
  7. If desired, it is also possible to “filter” or “edit” out the isotope labelled component and detect only the unlabelled component.
  8. Ligand is NMR silent
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Chemical shift perturbation mapping

A
  1. Monitor 1H-15N HSQC when unlabelled/differently labelled molecule added
  2. 1H-15N HSQC: every residue type (except Pro) contains a highly sensitive probe to changes in local environment
  3. 1H-13C HSQC: information on sidechain-mediated interactions, but signal overlap is an issue in proteins > 25 kDa
  4. Binding of ligand/macromolecule changes environment of nuclei at molecular interface – hence chemical shifts change (and/or peaks get weaker)
  5. Effect may propagate beyond binding site as proteins are “cooperative” materials
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Linked fragment approach to drug discovery

A
  1. Fragments (MW < 300 Da, high ligand efficiency) that bind to proximal sites on protein are linked to form one compound with enhanced affinity
  2. High ligand efficiency- good binding
  3. Theoretical binding energy of a linked molecule, DG(AB), composed of two components A and B, is represented by
  4. DG(AB) = DG(A) + DG(B) + DG(L)
  5. DG(A) and DG(B) = binding energies of the unlinked components
  6. DG(L) includes contributions to binding energy due to linking
  7. LE = ligand efficiency (deltaGbinding per heavy atom)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is advantage of NMR to discover fragment hits

A
  1. Chemical shift (or intensity) perturbation to discover fragment hits
  2. Advantage: NMR can detect very weak interactions (Kd up to 10-2 M)
  3. Hence, NMR can detect weak binding fragments (initial lead compounds
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Chemical shift perturbation mapping: -compound cocktails

A
  1. Reduce peaks as only specific amino acids are labeled

2. Looks to see if any of these compounds are involved in interaction with protein

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are some other fragment screening methods

A
  1. Thermal shift: increase in melting temperature of protein if fragment binds.
  2. Mass spectrometry (MS): detect a protein:fragment complex directly.
  3. NMR (WaterLOGSY): unbound ligand signals (green spectrum) and inversion in the presence of target (red).
  4. Surface plasmon resonance (SPR): sensorgrams as function of concentration - binding kinetics.
  5. X-ray crystallography (XRC): unambiguous determination of fragment binding mode, essential for fragment development.
  6. In silico (docking): ensemble of ranked, docked conformations.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly