NML Evaluation A02 (strengths and weaknesses)

Question 1

Strengths of NML

Answer 1

• Universal Rules:
  Provides common rules everyone can follow, regardless of culture or time.
• Clear and Logical:
• Easy to follow because it is based on reason and natural human thinking.
• Clear distinctions between actions that are intrinsically good or evil.
• Human-Centered:
  Rooted in human nature, focusing on happiness and purpose (telos). Offers a positive view of humanity’s potential.
• Faith and Reason:
  Aquinas unites Christian teachings with logical reasoning, accessible to both believers and non-believers.
• Promotes Virtues:
  Encourages developing good character through cardinal virtues and theological virtues.

Question 2

Weaknesses of NML

Answer 2

• Outdated Views:
  Condemns acts like homosexuality and contraception, which are widely accepted today.
• Rigid and Legalistic:
  Strict rules can result in unloving outcomes, contrary to Christian compassion.
• Absurd Outcomes:
  Precepts can lead to illogical conclusions (e.g., infertile couples should not have sex).
• Unrealistic View of Human Nature:
  Assumes people always aim for good but misunderstand it (apparent goods).
  Critics argue some actions, like rape, are not misguided attempts at good.

Question 3

Overall view on NML - Conclusion idea

Answer 3

Natural Moral Law claims to offer universal truth and moral clarity, but beneath its timeless facade lies a system too rigid to handle the complexities of human life. Its insistence on absolute rules ignores cultural diversity, and evolving moral standards. While it promises order, it delivers inflexibility leading to absurd conclusions and unloving outcomes. Morality isn’t found in outdated rulebooks or abstract ideals; it’s found in real lives, real choices, and real consequences. NML’s failure to adapt isn’t a strength it’s its downfall. Ethics demands relevance, not relics.