njnj Flashcards

1
Q

what is freedom?

A

is an integral part of more than one component of ourselves. It is integral to our humanity, it is integral to our current living conditions, and it is integral to our character.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is choice

A

the presence of valid options

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is will?

A

the capacity to make a choice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is free will?

A

the state of one’s will to be free from external constraint

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is agency?

A

the capacity to act on one’s will

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is political freedom?

A

pertains to the institutional constraints and rights that society has formalized. This is the type of freedom that is more, for lack of a better phrase, “down to earth.” It explores the justification, the balance, and the consistency for laws in the constitution, religion, and communities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

pertains to the institutional constraints and rights that society has formalized. This is the type of freedom that is more, for lack of a better phrase, “down to earth.” It explores the justification, the balance, and the consistency for laws in the constitution, religion, and communities.

A

political freedom

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

the capacity to act on one’s will

A

agency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

the state of one’s will to be free from external constraint

A

free will

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

the capacity to make a choice

A

will

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

the presence of valid options

A

choice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

is an integral part of more than one component of ourselves. It is integral to our humanity, it is integral to our current living conditions, and it is integral to our character.

A

freedom

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is Metaphysical Freedom

A

It pertains to a more abstract understanding of freedom, one that is fundamental to the relationship of human consciousness to existence. A great deal of argument centers on whether human agency and will are within personal control, or subject, completely or partially, to external forces.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

It pertains to a more abstract understanding of freedom, one that is fundamental to the relationship of human consciousness to existence. A great deal of argument centers on whether human agency and will are within personal control, or subject, completely or partially, to external forces.

A

Metaphysical Freedom

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what are the four circumstances?

A

Mitigating
Aggravating
exempting
justifying

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

These are factors which lessens the criminal liability of an individual on account that his will has been unduly compromised or inhibited prior to committing a crime. The argument stands that in the event where the individual is uncompromised, then the action would not have taken place or would not have been as grave.

A

mitigating circumstances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

mitigating circumstances

A

These are factors which lessens the criminal liability of an individual on account that his will has been unduly compromised or inhibited prior to committing a crime. The argument stands that in the event where the individual is uncompromised, then the action would not have taken place or would not have been as grave.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

what circumstance does this belong to?
Article 13 of the Revised Penal Code

That the offender had no intention to commit so grave a wrong as that committed.

That sufficient provocation or threat on the part of the offended party immediately preceded the act.

That the act was committed in the immediate vindication of a grave offense to the one committing the felony his spouse, ascendants, descendants, legitimate, natural or adopted brothers or sisters or relatives by affinity within the same degrees

That of having acted upon an impulse so powerful as naturally to have produced passion or obfuscation.

A

Mitigating circumstances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

what is aggravating circumstances?

A

These are factors which increase the criminal liability of an individual on account that he has exercised maximum will before, in, or after committing the crime. The argument states that the intent of the individual heightens its severity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

These are factors which increase the criminal liability of an individual on account that he has exercised maximum will before, in, or after committing the crime. The argument states that the intent of the individual heightens its severity.

A

aggravating circumstances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

what circumstance does this belong to?

Examples: Article 14 of the Revised Penal Code

  1. That the crime be committed in contempt of or with insult to the public authorities.
  2. That the crime be committed in the palace of the Chief Executive, or in his presence, or where public authorities are engaged in the discharge of their duties, or in a place dedicated to religious worship.
  3. That the crime be committed in the nighttime, or in an uninhabited place, or by a band, whenever such circumstances may facilitate the commission of the offense. Whenever more than three armed malefactors shall have acted together in the commission of an offense, it shall be deemed to have been committed by a band.
A

Aggravating circumstances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

These are factors which altogether grants the individual pardon on account of a severely compromised will to the point of little to no agency on the matter.

A

Exempting Circumstances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Exempting Circumstances

A

These are factors which altogether grants the individual pardon on account of a severely compromised will to the point of little to no agency on the matter.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Examples: Article 12 of the Revised Penal Code

An imbecile or an insane person, unless the latter has acted during a lucid interval.

Any person who, while performing a lawful act with due care, causes an injury by mere accident without fault or intention causing it.

Any person who acts under the compulsion of irresistible force
ELEMENTS:
That the compulsion is by means of physical force
That the physical force must be irresistible
That the physical force must come from a third person.

A

Exempting circumstances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Justifying

A

These are factors which absolves the individual of criminal liability when the act is done due to a necessity or lack of choice. In these cases, no criminal action is recorded or held against the individual.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

These are factors which absolves the individual of criminal liability when the act is done due to a necessity or lack of choice. In these cases, no criminal action is recorded or held against the individual.

A

Justifying circumstances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Examples: Article 11 of the Revised Penal Code

Self-defense
Defense of relatives
Defense of strangers
Avoidance of greater evil or injury
Fulfillment of duty or lawful exercise of right or office
Obedience to an order issued for some lawful purpose

A

justifying circumstances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

To put it simply, to have a right to something means to be able to do this action without expressed permission from others. It does not necessarily imply whether the action you take is moral or immoral as far as ethics is concerned.

A

Rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Rights

A

To put it simply, to have a right to something means to be able to do this action without expressed permission from others. It does not necessarily imply whether the action you take is moral or immoral as far as ethics is concerned.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

To put it simply, to have a right to something means to be able to do this action without expressed permission from others. It does not necessarily imply whether the action you take is moral or immoral as far as ethics is concerned.

A

Rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Prohibitions

A

are any law by the government that restricts action

are any law by the government that restricts action.

32
Q

are any law by the government that restricts action.

are any law by the government that restricts action.

A

Prohibitions

33
Q

Conflict

A

arises through the existence of governing agencies, whichare institutions in a country which holds the monopoly on legitimate force as sanctioned by the citizens; that rights become inversely related to prohibitions.

34
Q

arises through the existence of governing agencies, whichare institutions in a country which holds the monopoly on legitimate force as sanctioned by the citizens; that rights become inversely related to prohibitions.

A

Conflict

35
Q

Metaphysical Freedom

A

pertains to the debate between free will vs determinism.

36
Q

pertains to the debate between free will vs determinism.

A

Metaphysical Freedom

37
Q

This suggests that the individual has complete independent and autonomous control of his consciousness, free from external influence.

A

free will

38
Q

free will

A

This suggests that the individual has complete independent and autonomous control of his consciousness, free from external influence.

39
Q

suggests that the individual has no complete control pertaining to his consciousness

A

determinism

40
Q

determinism

A

suggests that the individual has no complete control pertaining to his consciousness (it is already determined)

41
Q

presupposes the existence of either an omniscient or an omnipotent deity, or usually both.

A

theological determinism

42
Q

theological determinism

A

presupposes the existence of either an omniscient or an omnipotent deity, or usually both.

43
Q

Hard determinism

A

You have no control on what’s going to happen

44
Q

You have no control on what’s going to happen

A

Hard determinism

45
Q

soft determinism

A

although something is determined, you still have the chance to have a free will

46
Q

although something is determined, you still have the chance to have a free will

A

soft determinism

47
Q

what are the 4 types of determinism?

A

hard
soft
theological
physical

48
Q

what are the 2 types of arguments of theological determinism?

A

argument from Omniscience
argument from Omnipotence

49
Q

argument from Omniscience

A

suggests a linear timeline of past, present, and future, in which the deity or god, knows the future of humanity’s present. In the eyes of such an entity, the future has already happened and implies that we at the present are inevitably living through the passage of time.

50
Q

suggests a linear timeline of past, present, and future, in which the deity or god, knows the future of humanity’s present. In the eyes of such an entity, the future has already happened and implies that we at the present are inevitably living through the passage of time.

A

argument from Omniscience

51
Q

argument from Omnipotent

A

also known as the “Divine Plan” Argument or Preordination, suggests that an omnipotent deity set in motion consciously set in motion every event that occurred since the creation of the universe.

52
Q

also known as the “Divine Plan” Argument or Preordination, suggests that an omnipotent deity set in motion consciously set in motion every event that occurred since the creation of the universe.

A

argument from Omnipotence

53
Q

Physical Determinism

A

is also known as Nomological Determinism and Scientific Determinism. It has been theorized by the materialist since the pre-Socratics but gains more and more traction with succeeding scientific discoveries.

A theory for this can be better explained by the thought experiment Laplace’s Demon, by Pierre-Simon Laplace. Suppose that there exists an observer (i.e. the demon) outside the universe which can calculate the position and momentum of every particle of any one given instance with infinite precision, then that entity would be able to accurately predict the next instance.

54
Q

is also known as Nomological Determinism and Scientific Determinism. It has been theorized by the materialist since the pre-Socratics but gains more and more traction with succeeding scientific discoveries.

A

Physical Determinism

55
Q

A theory for this can be better explained by the thought experiment Laplace’s Demon, by Pierre-Simon Laplace. Suppose that there exists an observer (i.e. the demon) outside the universe which can calculate the position and momentum of every particle of any one given instance with infinite precision, then that entity would be able to accurately predict the next instance.

A

Physical determinism

56
Q

the central idea of scientific determinism

A

laplace’ demon by Pierre - Simmon Laplace

57
Q

who theorized Laplace’s demon?

A

Pierre - Simmon Laplace

58
Q

concern’s the idea of determinism, namely the belief that the past can completely determines the future

states that, in this world, everything would pre-determined, no chance, no choice, and no uncertainty

A

Laplace’s Demon

59
Q

Laplace’s Demon

A

concern’s the idea of determinism, namely the belief that the past can completely determines the future

states that, in this world, everything would pre-determined, no chance, no choice, and no uncertainty

60
Q

pertains to the worth of one’s humanity, not it’s value. The difference is that value changes from individual perception to another

A

dignity

61
Q

is a socially constructed concept that has man at its very center. The foundations and basis may differ across time and countries, but the general ideas remain the same: that there exists an intrinsic worth to humanity.

A

dignity

62
Q

dignity

A

is a socially constructed concept that has man at its very center. The foundations and basis may differ across time and countries, but the general ideas remain the same: that there exists an intrinsic worth to humanity.

pertains to the worth of one’s humanity, not it’s value. The difference is that value changes from individual perception to another

63
Q

Pride

A

refers to the value one ascribes to his/her notion of self-worth, and oftentimes this is subjective. Some people have more pride than others, but every human’s dignity remains constant across different demographics or time.

64
Q

refers to the value one ascribes to his/her notion of self-worth, and oftentimes this is subjective. Some people have more pride than others, but every human’s dignity remains constant across different demographics or time.

A

Pride

65
Q

Humiliation

A

pertains to a state of diminished pride in the social context.

66
Q

pertains to a state of diminished pride in the social context.

A

Humiliation

67
Q

degradation

A

pertains to a state of diminished dignity, regardless whether the context is social or not

68
Q

pertains to a state of diminished dignity, regardless whether the context is social or not

A

degradation

69
Q

Dignity in Law

A

Albeit that dignity is an abstract concept, the application of this to our daily lives is very concrete and very real. It is one of the few concepts which is constitutionally enshrined in the Philippines as seen in Article II, Section 11 of the 1987 Constitution.

70
Q

Albeit that dignity is an abstract concept, the application of this to our daily lives is very concrete and very real. It is one of the few concepts which is constitutionally enshrined in the Philippines as seen in Article II, Section 11 of the 1987 Constitution.

A

Dignity in Law

71
Q

Sources of Dignity

A

. Theological Source
2. Ontological Source

72
Q

Theological Source

A

This feature of dignity elevates man’s status and makes him unique and justifies an anthropocentric view of the universe. Man’s dignity is of the same nature as God’s dignity, which makes it not subject even to one’s own character and moral stature.
This makes dignity, from this foundation, exclusive to humans.

73
Q

This feature of dignity elevates man’s status and makes him unique and justifies an anthropocentric view of the universe. Man’s dignity is of the same nature as God’s dignity, which makes it not subject even to one’s own character and moral stature.
This makes dignity, from this foundation, exclusive to humans.

A

Theological Source

74
Q

Ontological Source

A

This means that if an animal for instance, would develop consciousness to a degree that it qualifies as sentience, then that would be given the same level of dignity that man has. The same argument can be applied in the fictional, but not entirely improbable, event of extraterrestrial contact which displays intelligence.
Unlike the theological source, this means that dignity is not exclusive to homo sapiens.

75
Q

This means that if an animal for instance, would develop consciousness to a degree that it qualifies as sentience, then that would be given the same level of dignity that man has. The same argument can be applied in the fictional, but not entirely improbable, event of extraterrestrial contact which displays intelligence.
Unlike the theological source, this means that dignity is not exclusive to homo sapiens.

A

Ontological Source

76
Q

legal ramification

A

is implementation of laws which secures the concept of dignity regardless of individual consent as this is an act of dehumanization of one’s self.

77
Q

is implementation of laws which secures the concept of dignity regardless of individual consent as this is an act of dehumanization of one’s self.

A

legal ramification