NFIB v. Sibelius Flashcards
Two Principles of American Health Care
Fee for service
•Very expensive: 17.6% of GDP
•Does not keep Americans very healthy, despite our wealth
No denial of Service
•You show up at an ER, you will be treated, even if everyone knows you can’t pay
•Causes hospitals to charge higher rates to insurance companies
•Insurance companies raise costs on their customers
How American Finance Health Care (4 ways)
- Out of pocket (no insurance)
- Employer-financed insurance plans
- Medicaid, government insurance for poor
Medicare, government insurance for elderly
Insurance problems
Young
•Most likely to be unemployed = lack employer-financed plan•
Won’t purchase their own plan because unlikely to need extensive coverage
Employer-financed plans can’t keep up with rising costs
•Offer bare-bones coverage
Affordable Care Act/Obama care-mandates
Individual mandate
•Must purchase health insurance or pay a penalty to the IRS
•Tax credits offered to make insurance affordable for people who aren’t poor enough to get Medicaid
Employer mandate –not challenged
•Employers must provide insurance covering essential services
Affordable Care Act (ObamaCare) -Medicaid Expansion
Medicaid Expansion
•States asked to pass law allowing people below 138% of the poverty line to enroll
•Federal government will cover 100% of the new costs for a while
•Eventually, federal government and state will share this cost
If states do not expand, they lose all Medicaid funding
Affordable Care Act (ObamaCare) -Misc. (stay on parents insurance)
(Not challenged)
•Stay on parents insurance until age 26
•All plans must cover pre-existing conditions
•Websites allow consumers to comparison shop for plans
Issues (3)
- Whether the individual mandate is within Congress’ power under the Commerce Clause.
- If not, whether the individual mandate is within Congress’ power under the Taxing and Spending Clause.•Congress need only win one
- Separately, whether Medicaid expansion is within Congress power under the Taxing and Spending Clause.
Individual Mandates/Dispersion in Judges opinions
1.Five justices find a Commerce Clause violation
•Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Alito
Four justices disagree
•Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan
2.Five justices find no Taxing and Spending violation
•Roberts, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan
Four justices disagree
•Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Alito
Medicaid Expansion- Dispersion of Judges stances
Seven justices found a Taxing and Spending violation
•Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Breyer, Alito, Kagan
Two justices disagree
•Ginsburg and Sotomayor
Roberts: Limits of Commerce Clause
•“The Constitution grants Congress the power to ‘regulateCommerce.’ The power to regulate commerce presupposes the existence of commercial activity to be regulated.”
“As expansive as our cases construing the scope of the commerce power have been, they all have one thing in common: They uniformly describe the power as reaching ‘activity.’”
Does this rule fit the facts? –> Responses to Limits of commerce clause arguments (COMPELL) V. rational basis
Roberts says yes
•“The individual mandate…does not regulate existing commercial activity. It instead compels individuals to become active in commerce by purchasing a product…”
Ginsburg says no
Congress had a rational basis for concluding that the uninsured, as a class, substantially affect interstate commerce.”•People “without insurance consume billions of dollars of health-care products and services each year.”
Roberts: Legacy of Wickard
•“The farmer in Wickard was at least actively engaged in the production of wheat, and the Government could regulate that activity because of its effect on commerce. The Government’s theory here would effectively override that limitation.”
Ginsburg: Legacy of Wickard
•“It is well established by decisions of this Court that the power to regulate commerce includes the power to regulate the prices at which commodities in that commerce are dealt in and practices affecting such prices.”
“[F]orcing some farmers into the market to buy what they could provide for themselves” was, the Court held, a valid means of regulating commerce….
•Langauge from Wickard v. Filburn
Roberts: Necessary and Proper Clause (does not license + powers)
•Clause “does not license the exercise of any ‘great substantive and independent power[s]’ beyond those specifically enumerated.
Does not create new power for congress
allows Congress to exercise existing powers using the strategy it wants
Roberts: Legacy of Raich
•Angel Raich was not engaged in economic activity, but was punished. Isn’t this case the same?
Yes. Raich “concerned only the constitutionality of ‘individual applications of a concededly valid statutory scheme.’”
•Are most people who possess pot like Angel Raich? No –they bought their pot or they’re going to sell it.
If Congress can regulate drug sales as commerce
•It can regulate possession from non-economic activity with the Necessary and Proper Clause