New Communication Technologies Flashcards
What is media convergence?
“The Internet is the most powerful medium every created, because it can imitate all other media and they cannot imitate it.”
What does the Telecommunications Act of 1996 affect?
i. Telephone companies ii. Direct-to-home services Satellite tv iii. Wireless cable iv. Digital tv v. Interactive and other video services vi. Ownership and cross ownership rules vii. Broadcast license renewal
Why was Reno v. ACLU (1997) important?
i. Once sexually explicit material is posted, it’s available everywhere in the world ii. The internet is a “vast democartic fora.” iii. No intrusion, so FCC v. Pacifica doesn’t apply iv. Also distinguished 1. Ginsburg v. New York 2. Renton v. Playtime Theaters v. The CDA is a content-based regulation, so vagueness is important vi. O’Connor: CDA is unconstitutional, but Congress could create “adult zones” on the Internet
How has the Supreme Court interacted with New Communication Technologies (the Internet)
i. CDA 1996 indecent material restricted, Reno v. ACLU (1997): Unconstitutional ii. CPPA 1996 images of kiddie porn restricted, Ashcroft v. Free speech coalition (2002): Unconstitutional iii. COPA (1998) harmful material from commercial providers restricted, Ashcroft v. ACLU (2002), Unconstitutional, remanded. iv. CIPA 2002 public computers mut be filtered US v. American Library Association (2003), constitutional v. COPA 2004, harmful material for commercial providers restricted Ashcroft v. ACLU II (2004), law likely unconstitutional; remanded for more info on filtering software vi. PROTECT 2003, advertising of kiddie porn is illegal, US v. Williams (2008), constitutional
What are some issues with the internet and privacy?
i. Inappropriate use of the Internet ii. Privacy iii. Spam
What is the Traditional Rule in regards to privacy?
If it occurs in public, it cannot be private.
What did FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler say about the internet? What did he propose?
FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler says the Internet must be regulated and proposes rules for net neutrality.
What did Branzburg v. Hayes do for privacy? But….. And….
Newsgathering is protected But… i. Journalists don’t have rights other citizens don’t also have ii. Journalists have no rights to interview prisoners Pell v. Procunier iii. Nor do they have any rights to access to jails or prisons Saxbe v. Washington Post, Houchins v. KQED And… i. Access to military bases and battlefields has been limited by the Supreme Court ii. Trespassing laws apply to journalists just as they do to non-journalists iii. Law-enforcement officers cannot give journalists special access rights
What are restrictions on the government?
- If journalists have info that they receive but have no broken law to get info, once they publish they can’t be punished by government for the publication 2. Can still be sued for libel or invasion of privacy, but not by government 3. Landmark Communications v. Virginia a. Once the press has information, it can publish without fear of punishment. 4. Howard v. Des Moines Register a. The press cannot be punished for publishing the name of a rape victim 5. California passes a new anti-paparazzi law in 2010
What are some examples of the repercussions for silence?
i. John C. Wilson criticizes the Bush Administration ii. Robert Novak identifies Wilson’s wife – Valerie Plame – as a CIA agent iii. Judith Miller of the NY Times and Matthew Cooper of Time magazine receive info on Plame iv. Miller and Cooper refuse to identify their sources v. Novak discusses his testimony vi. Miller and Cooper are held in contempt of court vii. The Supreme Court denies cert. viii. Miller still won’t talk and is sent to jail. ix. Cooper’s source gives him permission to talk. x. Karl Rove is source. xi. Pierre Thomas – Justice Reporter for ABC, previously CBS 1. One of several journalists involved in case with Wen Ho Lee 2. Wen Ho Lee sues the federal government for privacy invasion a. Reporters said he was a leader of espionage 3. Five reporters refuse to reveal their sources and are held in contempt of court 4. The case is appealed 5. Five major news organizations pay $750,000 to settle. 6. Jane Kirtley: “blood money.” xii. Toni Locy wrote a series of articles on the government’s investigation of Army scientist Steven Hatfill related to 2001 anthrax attacks 1. She refused to name her sources and was fined $5,000 a day until she did (she was ordered to pay the fines herself) 2. Order vacated when Hatfill settled with the Justice Department
What is a pro and con argument for the protection of the press?
- Pro. The press is the eyes and ears of the public and must be free to gather info in order to inform public 2. Con. The press has right to gather news and keep sources confidential but must give up info essential to protect the rights of others
What did the WDBJ fine for $325,000 worth of indecency?
WDBJ fined for broadcasting about 3 seconds of explicit material visible on some tv sets
What happened in Branzburg v. Hayes?
a. Do journalists have a First Amend. Right to withhold the identities of news sources from grand juries or other enforcement agencies? i. Pappas and Black Panther Party ii. Branzbug and drug trafficking iii. Caldwell writing stories about Black Panther Party called to testify, refused to go to grand jury iv. Justice White: No you do not have right to withhold, societal interests in law enforcement outweigh; but media harassment will not be tolderated v. Powell concurs: the holding is limited vi. Douglas: the right exists vii. Stewart: a privilege exists, a four-part test must be met by the government
What is the Stewart Test?
- The government can require testimony from a journalist only if: a. It can show probably cause that the journalist has info clearly relevant to a specific violation of the law b. It can show the info is available nowhere else c. It can demonstrate a compelling and overriding interest in the info.
What is the proposed Federal Shield Laws?
i. HR 985 Free Flow of Information Act 1. Any person who regularly gathers, prepares, writes, edits, reports or publishes