Neighbour Law Flashcards

1
Q

Corrie v Craig

A
  • Action for payment based on UE refused.

- Neighbour had built fence using far more expensive materials than original.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Newton v Godfrey

A
  • Necessary repairs – gain court permission to do work

- Can bill other owner for cost

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Thom v Herrington

A

Impairment must measurable, not merely negligable. Action refused as fence did not jeapordise support of wall.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Duke of Buccleugh v Magistrates of Edinburgh

A
  • Assembly Rooms.
  • Pillars encroached neighbours land.
  • Objection to encroachment: 30 years deemed too late to raise.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Anderson v Brattisanni’s

A
  • Signpost/object affixed to building – encroachment
  • However, predecessor consent may be considered
  • Removal refused: no practical to move and essential
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Halkerston v Wedderburn

A

Overhanging branches – encroachment, can be ordered to remove.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Pollock v Drogo Development

A

Pipes – encroachment. As such ordered to remove.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Strathclyde Regional Council v Permsimmon Homes

A

Access to new estate partly over council land. Grant of permission did not give council consent as land owner. Priv/public law distinction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Mclellan v J&D Pierce

A

Court ordered removal of encroachment. Previously been told to stop.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Dryburgh v Fife

A

Where support is withdrawn, no need for proof of negligence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Buchan v Andrew

A
  • Vary title deeds of support.

- Exclusion of right to damages in removing support may impliedly include no duty to support

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Dunlop v Robertson

A
  • increasing height of wall successful defended for privacy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

More v Boyle

A

Spiteful act – closing off water which would normally percolate complainer’s property.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly