NEGLIGENCE Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

negligence described…

A
  • in Blyth v Birmingham Waterworks Co (1856)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

under the case of

A
  • Robinson v Chief Constable of WY
  • pre-existing duty between policeman and public
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

driver/other road user

A

nettleship v weston

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

doctor/patient

A
  • whitehouse v jordan
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

employer/employee

A
  • walker v northumberland cc
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

lawyer/patient

A

hall v simons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

novel situation

A
  • caparo v dickman
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

CAPARO
1.

A
  • harm/injury reasonably foreseeable
  • kent v griffiths
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

CAPARO
2.

A
  • proximity between C and D
  • time, space, or relationship (bourhill v young)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

CAPARO
3.

A
  • fair, just, and reasonable to impose a duty
  • mulachy v MOD
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

BREACH OF DUTY
reasonable man test

A
  • ordinary and competent person act the same as D/ did not do
  • BLYTH V BIRMINGHAM WATERWORKS CO
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

BREACH OF DUTY
ordinary person

A
  • WELLS V COOPER
  • judged to the standard of an ordinary person performing the task
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

BREACH OF DUTY
professional

A
  • judged by the standard of the profession as a whole
  • BOLAM V FRIERN HOSPITAL
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

BREACH OF DUTY
child

A
  • judged to the standard of the reasonable person of D’s age at the time of the incident
  • MULLINS V RICHARDS
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

BREACH OF DUTY
learner

A
  • judged to the standard of a competent and more experienced person
  • NETTLESHIP V WESTON
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

RISK FACTORS
has claimant

A
  • any special characteristics
  • PARIS V STEPNEY
17
Q

RISK FACTORS
likelihood

A
  • of harm/size of risk
  • BOLTON V STONE
18
Q

RISK FACTORS
appropriate

A
  • precautions been made
  • LATIMER V AEC
19
Q

RISK FACTORS
social utility

A
  • in an emergency, greater risks can be taken
  • WATTS V HERTS CC
20
Q

DAMAGE - FACTUAL CAUSATION
1.

A
  • act of c
  • MCKEW V HOLLAND
21
Q

DAMAGE - FACTUAL CAUSATION
2.

A
  • act of nature
  • CARSLOGIE STEAMSHIP V RNG
22
Q

DAMAGE - FACTUAL CAUSATION
3.

A
  • act of a 3rd party
  • KNIGHTLY V JOHNS
23
Q

DAMAGE - LEGAL CAUSATION
define

A
  • damage is reasonably foreseeable and not too remote
24
Q

DAMAGE - LEGAL CAUSATION
1.

A
  • type of damage caused
  • BRADFORD V ROBINSON RENTALS
25
Q

DAMAGE - LEGAL CAUSATION
2.

A
  • sequence of events
  • HUGHES V LORD ADVOCATE
26
Q

DAMAGE - LEGAL CAUSATION
3.

A

egg-shell skull rule
SMITH V LEECH BRAINS

27
Q

DEFENCES
consent

A
  • consent volti
  • c knows there is a risk of d acting negligently and freely consents
  • MORRIS V MURRAY
28
Q

REMEDIES
general damages

A
  • pecuniary loss - future loss of earnings/ medical expenses
  • non-pecuniary loss - pain and suffering, loss of amenity, bereavement
29
Q
A